BenReadingFC Penalty??? Hard to tell from this angle
Had no doubts at the time - will need to see MOTD
by bcubed » 09 Feb 2013 22:54
BenReadingFC Penalty??? Hard to tell from this angle
by Arch » 09 Feb 2013 23:17
by windermere_royal » 09 Feb 2013 23:43
by Ian Royal » 09 Feb 2013 23:44
by VOR » 09 Feb 2013 23:49
windermere_royal Shearer and Larwo both say its a pen,Rooney at OT given 7 times out of 10 , looked clumsy, in the outfield its a foul, inside the area???
by windermere_royal » 09 Feb 2013 23:54
VORwindermere_royal Shearer and Larwo both say its a pen,Rooney at OT given 7 times out of 10 , looked clumsy, in the outfield its a foul, inside the area???
What the f*** are you talking about? A penalty is a foul commited inside the penalty area. Defender kicked Alfie , it's a pen, no brainer. Which part of 'foul' and 'penalty area' don't you understand?
Usual Stoke - 90% hoof and thuggery, 10% stuff like Jerome's goal. What drugs was the ref on not to send off Whelan for his assault on Ledge?
by Arch » 10 Feb 2013 01:48
by Big Ern » 10 Feb 2013 03:41
by Millsy » 10 Feb 2013 03:47
Mr.T10 Are people forgetting earlier on results with the very open 4-4-2? Jesus christ imagine if McDermott didn't change the system (Wish he did it a lot sooner), I can tell you we will look a lot worse to QPR.
4-4-2 doesn't work from starting and people say 4-5-1 doesn't work but judging by results it does... Yes we change to 4-4-2 at the end to go more offensive at the end but that is just because its a lot easier to attack a defence with fitness levels low and normally we need to chase the game. 4-5-1 gets the thumbs up.
This season is all about survival and getting points on the board if that means we have to do it ugly and rescuing games late on then so be it.
Some people will never be happy.
Back to the game: We lost to a team who has only lost to Chelsea in nearly 20 games or so at home, we move on.
by loyalroyal4life » 10 Feb 2013 06:33
by SHORT AND CURLY » 10 Feb 2013 07:04
loyalroyal4life Anyone else think we are missing Guthrie in the centre?
by PistolPete » 10 Feb 2013 08:46
loyalroyal4life Anyone else think we are missing Guthrie in the centre?
by Stuka » 10 Feb 2013 09:40
by RoyalBlue » 10 Feb 2013 09:58
Ian Royal So that's Lawrenson, Shearer and Nicholas who all thought it was a penalty. Not exactly the best advocates, but the only neutral views I've seen.
Arch If that had been given against us with 20 seconds to go in injury time, we'd be livid. It was standard issue defending.
by glass half full » 10 Feb 2013 10:07
Stuka Stoke itself is a massive shithole. Even the oatcake shop was closed. The whole city should be levelled under the auspices of RAF Bomber Command
by Stuka » 10 Feb 2013 10:09
glass half fullStuka Stoke itself is a massive shithole. Even the oatcake shop was closed. The whole city should be levelled under the auspices of RAF Bomber Command
Did you break your Wedgwood crockery or something?
by VOR » 10 Feb 2013 12:12
Arch If that had been given against us with 20 seconds to go in injury time, we'd be livid. It was standard issue defending.
by Ian Royal » 10 Feb 2013 12:26
SHORT AND CURLYloyalroyal4life Anyone else think we are missing Guthrie in the centre?
No
by Cureton's Volley » 10 Feb 2013 12:47
RoyalBlue That challenge would have been penalised had it occurred outside the area, therefore the ref was completely wrong not to have awarded a penalty - in essence he bottled it - possibly because of the time it happened?
by Royal Lady » 10 Feb 2013 13:52
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Horsham Royal, st george, Sutekh and 515 guests