by sandman » 10 Feb 2014 20:30
by Loyal royal 247 » 10 Feb 2014 20:35
sandman Dislike:
Man United - I think anyone who grew up in Berkshire with their "fans" throughout the 90's know why, the Liverpool of our generation .
Liverpool - Victim complex, with no sense of humour and to top it all off Rodgers is their manager.
Bolton - Does anyone really need to ask why?
Walsall - See above.
Swansea - See above.
Wolves - You get the idea.
Burnley - Again, you get the idea.
Like:
Crewe - Good club who have done a very good job producing their own talent.
Wigan - Chairman can be a bit of a knob sometimes but then so can ours.
West Brom - Used the Parachute payments well to keep building the club steadily.
Man City - Unlike some fans of certain clubs close to them and other clubs who play in blue and have come into money they don't appear to have changed a lot because of it. Despite what they've spent you rarely see their players in the papers for anything other than football (certainly since getting rid of Mad Mario).
Brentford - Play at one of the last proper grounds in the country. Feel a bit sorry for them after we beat them on the last day.
by sandman » 10 Feb 2014 21:02
Loyal royal 247sandman Dislike:
Man United - I think anyone who grew up in Berkshire with their "fans" throughout the 90's know why, the Liverpool of our generation .
Liverpool - Victim complex, with no sense of humour and to top it all off Rodgers is their manager.
Bolton - Does anyone really need to ask why?
Walsall - See above.
Swansea - See above.
Wolves - You get the idea.
Burnley - Again, you get the idea.
Like:
Crewe - Good club who have done a very good job producing their own talent.
Wigan - Chairman can be a bit of a knob sometimes but then so can ours.
West Brom - Used the Parachute payments well to keep building the club steadily.
Man City - Unlike some fans of certain clubs close to them and other clubs who play in blue and have come into money they don't appear to have changed a lot because of it. Despite what they've spent you rarely see their players in the papers for anything other than football (certainly since getting rid of Mad Mario).
Brentford - Play at one of the last proper grounds in the country. Feel a bit sorry for them after we beat them on the last day.
What about west ham.
by watfordroyal » 10 Feb 2014 21:39
by Green » 10 Feb 2014 21:42
by watfordroyal » 10 Feb 2014 22:07
Green I always thought it was "auld firm". But 'greed, I'm more of a Jags fan myself.
What's the Aberdeen connection, watford?
by sputnik » 10 Feb 2014 22:26
Victor Meldrew BTW Lol @ those posters thinking that other fans are pikeys and inbreds-have a good look around fellas when you next go to the Mad Stad and remember where the ground is situated.
by From Despair To Where? » 10 Feb 2014 22:44
sputnikVictor Meldrew BTW Lol @ those posters thinking that other fans are pikeys and inbreds-have a good look around fellas when you next go to the Mad Stad and remember where the ground is situated.
I was wondering myself why pompey fans keep get referred to as pikeys. What's the origin of this? Is Portsmouth one giant traveller site?
by leon » 11 Feb 2014 00:10
sputnikVictor Meldrew BTW Lol @ those posters thinking that other fans are pikeys and inbreds-have a good look around fellas when you next go to the Mad Stad and remember where the ground is situated.
I was wondering myself why pompey fans keep get referred to as pikeys. What's the origin of this? Is Portsmouth one giant traveller site?
by 6 Million Dollar Man » 11 Feb 2014 08:15
by 6 Million Dollar Man » 11 Feb 2014 08:21
by Will95 » 11 Feb 2014 08:48
No Fixed Abode Quite ironic that many of you hate Chelsea due to Romans millions. Many of you said he would walk, sooner rather than later. Reading fans hated the concept of a free spending foreign owner 'buying' success.
Fast forward 10 years and TSI want to buy Reading FC. A 'rich' Russian owner with 'money' to spend. Rings a bell doesn't it? Suddenly Reading fans are excited at the prospect of competing with the big boys, buying top players. The irony is there for all to see.
Meanwhile, 11 years and many many trophies later, Roman is still at Chelsea whilst Anton Zingarevich had his 5 minutes of fame and left Reading quicker than Brendan Rodgers.
So for the time being, the 'Reading way' is back and the rich clubs are a scourge on our game. The only question is, will you have the opportunity to move the goalposts again?
by under the tin » 11 Feb 2014 08:51
by NewCorkSeth » 11 Feb 2014 08:56
Will95No Fixed Abode Quite ironic that many of you hate Chelsea due to Romans millions. Many of you said he would walk, sooner rather than later. Reading fans hated the concept of a free spending foreign owner 'buying' success.
Fast forward 10 years and TSI want to buy Reading FC. A 'rich' Russian owner with 'money' to spend. Rings a bell doesn't it? Suddenly Reading fans are excited at the prospect of competing with the big boys, buying top players. The irony is there for all to see.
Meanwhile, 11 years and many many trophies later, Roman is still at Chelsea whilst Anton Zingarevich had his 5 minutes of fame and left Reading quicker than Brendan Rodgers.
So for the time being, the 'Reading way' is back and the rich clubs are a scourge on our game. The only question is, will you have the opportunity to move the goalposts again?
I hate Chelsea 'cos all the glory hunting oxf*rd around here support them. So .
by soggy biscuit » 11 Feb 2014 09:06
No Fixed Abode Quite ironic that many of you hate Chelsea due to Romans millions. Many of you said he would walk, sooner rather than later. Reading fans hated the concept of a free spending foreign owner 'buying' success.
Fast forward 10 years and TSI want to buy Reading FC. A 'rich' Russian owner with 'money' to spend. Rings a bell doesn't it? Suddenly Reading fans are excited at the prospect of competing with the big boys, buying top players. The irony is there for all to see.
Meanwhile, 11 years and many many trophies later, Roman is still at Chelsea whilst Anton Zingarevich had his 5 minutes of fame and left Reading quicker than Brendan Rodgers.
So for the time being, the 'Reading way' is back and the rich clubs are a scourge on our game. The only question is, will you have the opportunity to move the goalposts again?
by WAZZOCK » 11 Feb 2014 09:24
No Fixed Abode Quite ironic that many of you hate Chelsea due to Romans millions. Many of you said he would walk, sooner rather than later. Reading fans hated the concept of a free spending foreign owner 'buying' success.
Fast forward 10 years and TSI want to buy Reading FC. A 'rich' Russian owner with 'money' to spend. Rings a bell doesn't it? Suddenly Reading fans are excited at the prospect of competing with the big boys, buying top players. The irony is there for all to see.
Meanwhile, 11 years and many many trophies later, Roman is still at Chelsea whilst Anton Zingarevich had his 5 minutes of fame and left Reading quicker than Brendan Rodgers.
So for the time being, the 'Reading way' is back and the rich clubs are a scourge on our game. The only question is, will you have the opportunity to move the goalposts again?
by AkpansBFF » 11 Feb 2014 10:14
by From Despair To Where? » 11 Feb 2014 10:16
by Tony Le Mesmer » 11 Feb 2014 11:24
NewCorkSeth Dislike - Tottenham, Aston Villa, West Ham, Man Utd, Crystal Palace, Cardiff, Wigan, Blackburn, Bolton. All irrational hatred. Except for Aston Villa, I know why I hate them.
Like - West Brom, Huddersfield, Arsenal
Users browsing this forum: BarryWhiteRFC, Google Adsense [Bot], Snowball and 422 guests