by Brum Royal » 05 Aug 2014 09:53
by Horsham Royal » 05 Aug 2014 10:33
The Rougehandbags_harris I'd like to know how the qubits in the Rougeometer are entangled. This absolutelt must be a quantum computer that he has...
The qubit entanglement was rather straightforward, it was the silicon chip development that was a stumbling block. Typically, making a chip involves creating a stencil of the circuit, etching it onto a silicon wafer and putting the components on it layer by layer, but beyond 14nm this is very, very hard and we needed time to develop that. We needed to regulate the temperature in the cellar as well, as it needs to be regulated at below 13 degrees.
by floyd__streete » 05 Aug 2014 13:11
Zammofloyd__streete WASP > Rougeometer.
Fcuking WASP. Mrs Zammo reckons my new catchphrase is "will you stop going on about WASP". It defo won't be used next cricket season.
by Horsham Royal » 05 Aug 2014 13:17
floyd__streeteZammofloyd__streete WASP > Rougeometer.
Fcuking WASP. Mrs Zammo reckons my new catchphrase is "will you stop going on about WASP". It defo won't be used next cricket season.
WASP had Hants as 21% chance of winning at the start of their T20 innings on Sunday. They won with ease
LOL @ 'scientific research' into sporting outcomes.
by Sutekh » 05 Aug 2014 17:16
by The Rouge » 05 Aug 2014 17:58
by SydenhamRoyal » 07 Aug 2014 22:38
BraisingsteakRoyalWycombe Royal There is more chance of being 22nd-24th than there is of being 1st or 2nd.
Questioning the Rougeometer at this early stage - bold.
by NewCorkSeth » 08 Aug 2014 12:54
by Davezk » 08 Aug 2014 13:13
by Libertine » 16 Aug 2014 17:51
by blueroyals » 30 Aug 2014 20:03
by blueroyals » 15 Sep 2014 13:47
by Z175 » 15 Sep 2014 14:09
NewCorkSeth Reading f.c. "mentioned" in f365's article on the coming championship season
http://www.football365.com/f365-feature ... /Champo365
Careful! If you blink you might miss it.
by Ian Royal » 15 Sep 2014 14:13
Ian Royalmaffff Seems about right to me. Perhaps a little positive, but who am I to dismiss the almighty Rougeometer?
+1 to maffff
Hopefully it'll be more reliable than the last couple of seasons when it broke down after about two weeks. I can't believe it was the almighty Rougeometer at fault though. I expect it was user error from Rouge.
by The Rouge » 15 Sep 2014 14:53
by Ian Royal » 15 Sep 2014 14:59
by Gordons Cumming » 15 Sep 2014 15:13
by SydenhamRoyal » 15 Sep 2014 19:32
by Horsham Royal » 15 Sep 2014 22:18
SydenhamRoyal so 38.6% chance of top 6
surely a further refinement would be chances of promotion?
by Winchester Royal » 15 Sep 2014 22:24
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus and 406 guests