by Royal1988 »
10 Jun 2016 23:52
So as Jaap Stam is all but confirmed as our new manager, I now bring you part two of my analysis (don’t worry it is not as long as the first!) Well not so much of an analysis now, as it is more my thoughts, as we are now looking to the future.
This appointment raises the question that when it seems that everyone knew he would be our new manager two weeks ago, why has it taken this long to announce it? Is it just that they had to agree terms with him? Or is it another example of the owners having to get together, or were they just waiting for Nigel Howe to come back from holiday to formally announce it while everything behind the scenes has been going ahead for the last two weeks? If it has indeed taken two weeks to get anything done, then at least this lengthy process will not have had any impact this time, as everyone is on holiday, or busy at the Euros. I hope that the answer is the latter, and in the last 2 weeks, JS has been busy preparing for his new role. While the timing has been convenient this time for this lengthy period between appointment and announcement, it would be rather different if this happens again during the season, as then we could be needlessly without a manager for vital matches. I also hope that the decision to change now is so that we will not change mid season once again.
When I first heard Jaap Stam was the likely candidate, I was against it as he had no experience in senior management, let alone the Championship. After taking a step back however, I see that this may not necessarily be a bad thing. It means that he will not come with any pre-conceived ideas and may work with what he has rather than trying to turn the team into something that they are not. Plus, his experience with youth may be useful (and I and not saying that Brian McDermott would not have been good with the young players given time). However, I still worry that his inexperience will ultimately turn out to be a hindrance, not because of the man himself, but because gaining this experience will take time, and I fear that he will be judged on his results early on. If they are not very good, the owners could decide to get rid, and we will be back to square one. I have seen both one and two year contracts mentioned. A one year contract would suggest that they indeed do attend to go down this route.
I mentioned before that one of our biggest problems last season was our mental strength, from the Fulham game onward, often not being able to see out wins, or hold onto draws. While he undoubtedly has this mental strength, it is something that can’t really be coached, you either have it or you don’t, so while we have lost several players from last season, we do still have some and so JS may well have the same problem as our last two managers unless he is backed by the Thais and gets some new players to mix with the youngsters and the remaining players. Failure to do this may not help his cause, or our results.
You may have noticed a theme emerging here. It is of course, give him time. And this brings me back to my earlier point about togetherness. While I was not the biggest fan of getting Jaap Stam as manager, as long as there are no extenuating circumstances such as his training methods injuring a lot of our players (I’m not saying it will, but it happens). As long as he has the dressing room and can motivate the players while they still have something to play for, then I will get behind him, and support him, even if our results are not very good. I hope that we can all do the same, even those who wanted BM to stay, and not start calling for him to go after a run of a few bad results. Then hopefully, if we can all back the dutchman, especially when things are not going our way, it will help the team too, and maybe, just maybe it might help convince the owners to stick with a manger and bring some stability back to the club.