by pwb » 21 Jun 2017 13:04
by Top Flight » 21 Jun 2017 13:19
by Forbury Lion » 21 Jun 2017 13:34
by Nameless » 21 Jun 2017 14:02
by Top Flight » 21 Jun 2017 14:07
by Y21 » 21 Jun 2017 15:06
by Ascotexgunner » 21 Jun 2017 15:45
Nameless I judge Redknapp on the basis that few fans of club's he has managed seem to speak highly of him . My impression is he is a wheeler dealer rather than a manager. Spends money he doesn't have then quits to let others sort out the mess. I also prefer a manager who coaches as well. Harry is well known for being office based.
Slightly bizarre to see the Fulham love in continue. Does the best manager in the league scrape a playoff place at the last minute then abjectly fail at the first hurdle ? Stam certainly performed way better than him when it mattered in the semi.
by tee peg » 21 Jun 2017 15:51
Y21 Let them continue underestimating us. It's served us well in the past.
by pwb » 21 Jun 2017 16:24
Nameless I judge Redknapp on the basis that few fans of club's he has managed seem to speak highly of him . My impression is he is a wheeler dealer rather than a manager. Spends money he doesn't have then quits to let others sort out the mess. I also prefer a manager who coaches as well. Harry is well known for being office based.
Slightly bizarre to see the Fulham love in continue. Does the best manager in the league scrape a playoff place at the last minute then abjectly fail at the first hurdle ? Stam certainly performed way better than him when it mattered in the semi.
by Nameless » 21 Jun 2017 16:43
pwbNameless I judge Redknapp on the basis that few fans of club's he has managed seem to speak highly of him . My impression is he is a wheeler dealer rather than a manager. Spends money he doesn't have then quits to let others sort out the mess. I also prefer a manager who coaches as well. Harry is well known for being office based.
Slightly bizarre to see the Fulham love in continue. Does the best manager in the league scrape a playoff place at the last minute then abjectly fail at the first hurdle ? Stam certainly performed way better than him when it mattered in the semi.
Sound like the Labour party
by NewCorkSeth » 21 Jun 2017 18:37
by pwb » 21 Jun 2017 19:44
NamelesspwbNameless I judge Redknapp on the basis that few fans of club's he has managed seem to speak highly of him . My impression is he is a wheeler dealer rather than a manager. Spends money he doesn't have then quits to let others sort out the mess. I also prefer a manager who coaches as well. Harry is well known for being office based.
Slightly bizarre to see the Fulham love in continue. Does the best manager in the league scrape a playoff place at the last minute then abjectly fail at the first hurdle ? Stam certainly performed way better than him when it mattered in the semi.
Sound like the Labour party
You sound like a Daily Mail reader.....
by Jagermesiter1871 » 21 Jun 2017 21:36
by Sutekh » 22 Jun 2017 09:08
Jagermesiter1871 "Reading underachieved compared to what was expected and played boring football" - but the Dutchman merits a place in the top 10 on the evidence to hand.
does that even make sense?
by Hound » 22 Jun 2017 09:50
by SCIAG » 22 Jun 2017 10:38
by From Despair To Where? » 22 Jun 2017 11:10
by Woodcote Royal » 22 Jun 2017 11:20
NewCorkSeth If Fulham ( according to this article) have the best team and the best manager why did they not win the league? Seems a bit of a logical fallacy there.
Sure the awful team that reading apparently are have the best manager as he squeezed a false third finish out of us.
by NewCorkSeth » 22 Jun 2017 12:00
SCIAG It's a very bizarre list.
Personally I think Bruce should be at #1 with Redknapp being the only other person you could justify being that high. They're managers who have made significant achievements at the highest level and have been seriously linked to the England job.
The Fulham manager got Watford promoted and then got sacked for no reason so I think putting him at third is fair enough.
I think Rowett's mostly just rated because Zola did a very bad job at Birmingham but he's a reasonable pick for a top 5 spot.
I have no idea what Gary Monk's done to earn a place on the list.
by glass half full » 22 Jun 2017 12:33
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 439 guests