Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

tilehurstender
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 22:26

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by tilehurstender » 13 Aug 2017 15:28

As the sending off was practically at the start of the game there should have been plenty of time to change to a plan B . Oh no, sorry I forgot, we don't have one.
As for Stams dealing in the transfer market? Over a dozen players brought in and with the exception of Moore who probably won't be around for long, none have been much of an improvement on what was already here.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24971
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by Hound » 13 Aug 2017 15:37

tilehurstender As the sending off was practically at the start of the game there should have been plenty of time to change to a plan B . Oh no, sorry I forgot, we don't have one.
As for Stams dealing in the transfer market? Over a dozen players brought in and with the exception of Moore who probably won't be around for long, none have been much of an improvement on what was already here.


Yep you're right. We were better when we ended 19th with a team of loanees than the side we came third with last year

SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6372
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by SCIAG » 13 Aug 2017 15:49

tilehurstender As for Stams dealing in the transfer market? Over a dozen players brought in and with the exception of Moore who probably won't be around for long, none have been much of an improvement on what was already here.

Blackett, Swift, Ilori, and Beerens all clearly improved the quality of the squad. Harriott and Joey added much-needed depth too.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39819
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by Snowflake Royal » 13 Aug 2017 16:20

tilehurstender As the sending off was practically at the start of the game there should have been plenty of time to change to a plan B . Oh no, sorry I forgot, we don't have one.
As for Stams dealing in the transfer market? Over a dozen players brought in and with the exception of Moore who probably won't be around for long, none have been much of an improvement on what was already here.


You don't tend to need a plan B, when plan A was working fine.

tilehurstender
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 22:26

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by tilehurstender » 13 Aug 2017 17:42

And the attacking football that was promised?


tilehurstender
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 22:26

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by tilehurstender » 13 Aug 2017 17:46

Also,Stam has had more support from the board than any previous manager.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24971
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by Hound » 13 Aug 2017 18:03

tilehurstender Also,Stam has had more support from the board than any previous manager.


Based on what? Clarke had plenty of support for his expensive loan signings and messed it up. Stam I'm guessing is round about breaking even after selling Tish, Norwood and Cooper

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39819
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Matchwatch: Fulham (H)

by Snowflake Royal » 13 Aug 2017 22:48

tilehurstender And the attacking football that was promised?

We had 20 odd shots and most of the game was played in their half. All we did was attack.

Coppell, Pardew, Burns and Rodgers got plenty of support.

£2m on Matt oxf*rd MiLOLLOLs ffs. Plus £800k on McAnuff and £500k on Rasiak. Didn't he sign Brian Howard as well? All in one window.

Pards got Murrey and Goater for £800k a piece.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 438 guests

It is currently 19 Apr 2024 04:47