by windermereROYAL » 23 Aug 2017 09:12
by Nameless » 23 Aug 2017 09:19
by West Stand Man » 23 Aug 2017 09:30
by windermereROYAL » 23 Aug 2017 10:06
by Hound » 23 Aug 2017 13:56
by Platypuss » 23 Aug 2017 14:38
by surrounded by saints » 23 Aug 2017 16:10
by surrounded by saints » 23 Aug 2017 16:11
by surrounded by saints » 23 Aug 2017 16:12
by Lower West » 23 Aug 2017 17:16
windermereROYAL Reading have struggled to retain and recruit players and, as a result, only named six out of a possible seven substitutes on their opening day trip to Queens Park Rangers.
by Nameless » 23 Aug 2017 17:46
surrounded by saints I wouldnt be supprised to see Jaap walk away if he doesnt get his transfer targets.
by FiNeRaIn » 23 Aug 2017 18:54
Hound At least we've got some quality in this year and spent a few quid since the new owners came along
by Nameless » 24 Aug 2017 12:45
by Snowflake Royal » 25 Aug 2017 22:41
Nameless We've got 2 big central strikers, plenty of wingers and a number of players who play in attacking roles. If it wasn't for injuries we wouldn't be saying we are short of strikers. It's debateable whether spending £10 million on a striker as injury cover makes sense, although of course it would be lovely to do it.
By all accounts we've made a number of bids in the millions but for a variety of reasons they've not come off (yet).
As for 'not seeing the investment we expected' I think you have got rather out of touch. No one was expecting us to spend £20 million. We've spent probably £10 million under the Chinese already and the bids we've been making for strikers would push us up towards that £20 million net spend. If we bought the midfielder and defender we are reported to be after as well we might be pushing up towards £25 million given the prices we've been paying generally. How is that not a significant level of investment ?
by windermereROYAL » 25 Aug 2017 23:18
Nameless We've got 2 big central strikers, plenty of wingers and a number of players who play in attacking roles. If it wasn't for injuries we wouldn't be saying we are short of strikers. It's debateable whether spending £10 million on a striker as injury cover makes sense, although of course it would be lovely to do it.
By all accounts we've made a number of bids in the millions but for a variety of reasons they've not come off (yet).
As for 'not seeing the investment we expected' I think you have got rather out of touch. No one was expecting us to spend £20 million. We've spent probably £10 million under the Chinese already and the bids we've been making for strikers would push us up towards that £20 million net spend. If we bought the midfielder and defender we are reported to be after as well we might be pushing up towards £25 million given the prices we've been paying generally. How is that not a significant level of investment ?
by Nameless » 26 Aug 2017 11:57
by Hound » 26 Aug 2017 12:06
by maffff » 26 Aug 2017 12:25
FiNeRaInHound At least we've got some quality in this year and spent a few quid since the new owners came along
Thats the issue though, we haven't got enough. We are still lacking strikers and we keep buying wingers and midfielders. You can have 100 wingers but unless someone can score you 15-20 goals a season up front it doesn't matter.
Stam is entitled to whinge a bit. He was obviously promised financial backing for transfers when he signed his contract and its now a week before the deadline and he hasn't got the players he wants.
Are these Chinense people really billionaires, we really aren't seeing anywhere near the sort of investment we were expecting. No one is saying pull a wolves or a villa but we should be spending 8-12 million on firepower. That sort of fee could get top goalscorers in many foreign leagues to join with ease.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 519 guests