CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

191 posts
Double d v2
Member
Posts: 498
Joined: 16 Dec 2017 16:07

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Double d v2 » 24 May 2018 10:44

Hound wrote:
Hendo wrote:
Platypuss wrote:
Yep. Gone.


Lol. Some people just never learn.


Am I alone in having a little giggle at that DD response?


Yeah I do not see the problem in that. All I did was give to Ian as good as he gave to me.

Platypuss is just being harsh because of my previous convictions. He should ban Ian aswell for saying things before to me which were like that to me, yet he does not ban anybody else apart from me for doing what? Saying something that was a bit mean to some loser on a website.

Who is the real loser here?

User avatar
Hendo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3192
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 20:53

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Hendo » 24 May 2018 11:09

Double d v2 wrote:
Hound wrote:
Hendo wrote:
Lol. Some people just never learn.


Am I alone in having a little giggle at that DD response?


Yeah I do not see the problem in that. All I did was give to Ian as good as he gave to me.

Platypuss is just being harsh because of my previous convictions. He should ban Ian aswell for saying things before to me which were like that to me, yet he does not ban anybody else apart from me for doing what? Saying something that was a bit mean to some loser on a website.

Who is the real loser here?


Tbf, if you're looking to survive another banning, I would stop calling the mods losers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIyr5TXqe8Y

Watch this video....

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 12576
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: Doesn't really matter how, just so long as it's now. 

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Platypuss » 24 May 2018 11:26

Double d v2 wrote:
Hound wrote:
Hendo wrote:
Lol. Some people just never learn.


Am I alone in having a little giggle at that DD response?


Yeah I do not see the problem in that. All I did was give to Ian as good as he gave to me.

Platypuss is just being harsh because of my previous convictions.


You were finally suspended (following plenty of warnings) for your attitude to others and unacceptable behaviour on the board.

You came back under another username but patently haven't changed that behaviour.

I see nothing "harsh" about that.

Double d v2 wrote:Who is the real loser here?


Still you, while you display an inability to learn.

We're done here.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2021
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by tee peg » 24 May 2018 12:07

Has he gone yet ? (Edwards)

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10337
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: With grace we will suffer, with grace we shall recover

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by From Despair To Where? » 24 May 2018 12:09

Double d v2 wrote:
I have changed my behaviour, it is clearly obvious to see that and this was a one off thing done one time, it was witty banter with somebody who gave as good as they have gotten to be honest. If you actually were a proper Mod you would see that.




That's the funniest thing you've posted all year. If you've changed your behaviour, why did I post this on May 1st?

From Despair To Where? wrote:I'm confused. Doesn't v2 usually mean an upgrade?


And it's not a one off, it's why you got canned last time. I'd suggest winding your neck in and laying low.


Anyway, Dave Edwards. Nice bloke, coming off a shit season, not the future of RFC.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3784
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Snowflake Royal » 24 May 2018 14:48

I don't think I've ever implicitly or explicitly threatened violence to another nobber, and I believe that was the final straw for the last ban. There's some pretty clear escalation to a slightly shitty side comment there. Not that it bothered me at all, it's just dd's usual hot air with no self control. "Banter" it's not though, that requires some wit and both parties being in on it being a joke.

Soz everyone, shouldn't have taken the swipe.
Last edited by Snowflake Royal on 24 May 2018 14:49, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Man Andrews
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3278
Joined: 02 Oct 2017 13:06

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Old Man Andrews » 25 Jun 2018 12:48

Just seen an interview with Edwards at the training ground on the teams first day of pre season training,

Was kinda hoping the club would just get all the players to hide and switch all the lights off in the hope he'd go away.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 2400
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Feeding the leccy meter at the County Ground

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Lower West » 28 Jun 2018 22:16

Old Man Andrews wrote:Just seen an interview with Edwards at the training ground on the teams first day of pre season training,

Was kinda hoping the club would just get all the players to hide and switch all the lights off in the hope he'd go away.


Edwards wasn't the only player to underperform last season. Clean slate for everyone. Different team. Different style. Pre season will determine what works and what doesn't.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 17631
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by leon » 29 Jun 2018 01:18

Tbf I’m still reeling from Platypus banning DD for saying what everyone’s been thinking about Ian Royal for 10 years?

I’d have thought he actually could use that post in mitigation.


User avatar
Old Man Andrews
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3278
Joined: 02 Oct 2017 13:06

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Old Man Andrews » 29 Jun 2018 08:05

leon wrote:Tbf I’m still reeling from Platypus banning DD for saying what everyone’s been thinking about Ian Royal for 10 years?

I’d have thought he actually could use that post in mitigation.


It has been way more harmonious without him here though, we are all brothers now.

Tilehurstsouthbank
Member
Posts: 927
Joined: 25 Mar 2013 15:13

Re: CONFIMRED - Dave Edwards

by Tilehurstsouthbank » 29 Jun 2018 12:44

Old Man Andrews wrote:
leon wrote:Tbf I’m still reeling from Platypus banning DD for saying what everyone’s been thinking about Ian Royal for 10 years?

I’d have thought he actually could use that post in mitigation.


It has been way more harmonious without him here though, we are all brothers now.


Agreed he was a Twat. His point is valid though. :lol:

191 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], maffff and 47 guests

It is currently 24 Sep 2018 00:04