BFG QPR

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: BFG QPR

by Zip » 31 Mar 2018 21:22

paultheroyal
Zip
paultheroyal
Never ever understand criticism of Gunter and it’s more a fans knowledge of the game is the problem. What do you want him to do... sit on him for 90 mins. Whilst the bloke is out on the wing without the balll he is doing no harm. This means Gunter can play inside and cover. As soon as the ball is played out wide Gunter legs it over there to block the run best he can. It’s not rocket science.



I quite like Gunter actually but he was a long way from the opposition player and it was obvious the ball was heading in that direction. It meant a guaranteed cross every time as Gunter was too far away to prevent the cross. That is not rocket science either.


Don’t recalll one occasion when ball comes over and he has whipped in across before he gets there. Cross comes in or does not when put under pressure by Gunter. HTH.



There were a number of crosses that went in during the second half because Gunter could not get across in time. HTH.

RegularRoyal
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 20:48

Re: BFG QPR

by RegularRoyal » 31 Mar 2018 21:26

Wow, what a difference. The effort from the whole team was such a contrast to the rest of the season, and the stadium was absolutely rocking at the end. Yes, there is still a huge amount of work to do, but there was more excitement in that game than most of the rest of the season put together.

It's interesting how we all watch the same game, but see it so differently.

E.g. Edwards... yes, he was shot before the end, and that contributed to him giving away the penalty, but I would argue that was his best game for Reading... didn't stop from start to finish, even when he was knackered. I'd love to see the player running stats for that game, and I'd be very surprised if he wasn't way ahead of everybody else on the pitch.

Easily Illori's best game in a Reading shirt. If he made any mistakes, I must have missed them.

Also, Aluko's best game for Reading. Apart from his goal, he put in a massive amount of work defensively... something we haven't seen before. I'm sure his running stats will be 2nd only to Edwards.

Blackett also deserves a huge amount of credit. After the stick he's taken recently, to put in a performance like he did (sliced clearance aside) showed a lot of character.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39764
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: BFG QPR

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Mar 2018 21:33

Zip Agreed Leon. Been saying for a while now that fitness levels have been a problem. The players looked out on their feet yesterday and I thought Clement took too long to replace Swift who should have come off ten minutes earlier.

Frankly pre season was a complete clusterfuck

Agree with the point that QPR really attacked Gunter’s flank by switching an additional player to that side in the second half. It was a problem because Gunter was outnumbered without the support from the player in front who I thought was Barrow rather than Aluko.

Definitely Aluko right, though they may have switched briefly. Barrow had bright orange / yellow boots on, at least that's the easiest way I could tell them apart given my terrible eyesight.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: BFG QPR

by Zip » 31 Mar 2018 21:35

Snowflake Royal
Zip Agreed Leon. Been saying for a while now that fitness levels have been a problem. The players looked out on their feet yesterday and I thought Clement took too long to replace Swift who should have come off ten minutes earlier.

Frankly pre season was a complete clusterfuck

Agree with the point that QPR really attacked Gunter’s flank by switching an additional player to that side in the second half. It was a problem because Gunter was outnumbered without the support from the player in front who I thought was Barrow rather than Aluko.

Definitely Aluko right, though they may have switched briefly.


Fair enough. He was slow to back up Gunter at times.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39764
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: BFG QPR

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Mar 2018 21:37

Zip
Snowflake Royal
Zip Agreed Leon. Been saying for a while now that fitness levels have been a problem. The players looked out on their feet yesterday and I thought Clement took too long to replace Swift who should have come off ten minutes earlier.

Frankly pre season was a complete clusterfuck

Agree with the point that QPR really attacked Gunter’s flank by switching an additional player to that side in the second half. It was a problem because Gunter was outnumbered without the support from the player in front who I thought was Barrow rather than Aluko.

Definitely Aluko right, though they may have switched briefly.


Fair enough. He was slow to back up Gunter at times.

He looked like he was wading through treacle at times even first half. Defence isnt his strong point


User avatar
Muskrat
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1254
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 13:38
Location: In my bunker

Re: BFG QPR

by Muskrat » 31 Mar 2018 23:25

More entertainment in one game than I've seen all season at home. Back to the Reading of old, blood and thunder never say die attitude. However it has to be said QPR were far better than us (apart from the first 20 minutes) and should have left with something. Biggest thing for me was our fitness levels. We were out on our feet after 75 minutes and survived after that on sheer adrenaline. Get the fitness levels up and should be ok.

User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: BFG QPR

by CountryRoyal » 31 Mar 2018 23:56

Any teams fitness will be pushed when you’re defending for most of the game.

I think our previous style has something to do with it, were so used to seeing a lot of the ball and not a lot of movement that I’m not surprised their fitness levels (stamina) may not be up to scratch. They’re mostly a young and athletic bunch though so I’d imagine with proper training they’ll be up there within no time.

User avatar
The Reverend
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 10:41

Re: BFG QPR

by The Reverend » 01 Apr 2018 00:12

Hound If we win two more


I see a flaw in your plan...

User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: BFG QPR

by CountryRoyal » 01 Apr 2018 14:43

Not sure if it’s been mentioned but whilst his overall performance was a bit lacklustre I thought Swift’s set ball delivery was very good, far better than Kelly of late.


User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7311
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: BFG QPR

by tidus_mi2 » 01 Apr 2018 16:00

CountryRoyal Not sure if it’s been mentioned but whilst his overall performance was a bit lacklustre I thought Swift’s set ball delivery was very good, far better than Kelly of late.

Absolutely agreed, there was one free kick that was just dying to be poked home that everyone missed.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24965
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: BFG QPR

by Hound » 01 Apr 2018 16:14

Yep did mention it. They were absolutely top class. Ht hard, with curl and accuracy. Impossible to defend. Shame we had so few of them

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39764
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: BFG QPR

by Snowflake Royal » 01 Apr 2018 16:59

I'm surprised so many people were impressed by QPR. Their finishing was awful. Genuinely terrible. Mannone barely had a save to make, they came closer to hitting the corner flag than the net a couple of times and that penalty was shockingly bad. Perfect height to save, not near the post and not hit particularly hard.

Yeah, as we tired and decided to defend the lead they ponced around tidily in midfield dominating the game. But if you can't crack our defence when we're down to 10 you're not going to get far.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7311
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: BFG QPR

by tidus_mi2 » 01 Apr 2018 17:13

Snowflake Royal I'm surprised so many people were impressed by QPR. Their finishing was awful. Genuinely terrible. Mannone barely had a save to make, they came closer to hitting the corner flag than the net a couple of times and that penalty was shockingly bad. Perfect height to save, not near the post and not hit particularly hard.

Yeah, as we tired and decided to defend the lead they ponced around tidily in midfield dominating the game. But if you can't crack our defence when we're down to 10 you're not going to get far.

Completely agree, QPR were nothing special, they certainly got through our defence far too easily but most teams seem to do that, despite that, we seemed to restrict them mostly to speculative long range efforts that were either blocked or went harmlessly wide, hence their 3 shots on target.

They were better no doubt but considering the confidence the team must be in after the run we've had, I'll take any win when it comes around, same teams but without a run of 1 win in 18, I reckon we'd dominate the match.


User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: BFG QPR

by CountryRoyal » 01 Apr 2018 18:45

Snowflake Royal I'm surprised so many people were impressed by QPR. Their finishing was awful. Genuinely terrible. Mannone barely had a save to make, they came closer to hitting the corner flag than the net a couple of times and that penalty was shockingly bad. Perfect height to save, not near the post and not hit particularly hard.

Yeah, as we tired and decided to defend the lead they ponced around tidily in midfield dominating the game. But if you can't crack our defence when we're down to 10 you're not going to get far.


Ian everyone has highlighted their finishing as a problem but *beyond that* they were a good side and played well, you’d have to be blind not to see it. We’ve also seen time and time again it’s not always easy to break a team down with 10 men, I think that’s testament to the willingness and effort we put into organisation and discipline. It’s unfair to insinuate that they were poor just because they couldn’t beat us and “we are shit”.

It’s a game of opinions fair enough but a lot of QPR fans reckon that performance wasn’t far behind their Fulham and Villa ones.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: BFG QPR

by Zip » 01 Apr 2018 18:56

CountryRoyal
Snowflake Royal I'm surprised so many people were impressed by QPR. Their finishing was awful. Genuinely terrible. Mannone barely had a save to make, they came closer to hitting the corner flag than the net a couple of times and that penalty was shockingly bad. Perfect height to save, not near the post and not hit particularly hard.

Yeah, as we tired and decided to defend the lead they ponced around tidily in midfield dominating the game. But if you can't crack our defence when we're down to 10 you're not going to get far.


Ian everyone has highlighted their finishing as a problem but *beyond that* they were a good side and played well, you’d have to be blind not to see it. We’ve also seen time and time again it’s not always easy to break a team down with 10 men, I think that’s testament to the willingness and effort we put into organisation and discipline. It’s unfair to insinuate that they were poor just because they couldn’t beat us and “we are shit”.

It’s a game of opinions fair enough but a lot of QPR fans reckon that performance wasn’t far behind their Fulham and Villa ones.



Agreed. It’s been a long time since a team dominated possession like that at the Mad Stad.
Yes their finishing was very poor but they created a number of very good chances. I’m just glad they messed up. We also created almost nothing in attack.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20725
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: BFG QPR

by Snowball » 01 Apr 2018 19:05

I'd swap their midfield for ours any day

biff
Member
Posts: 661
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 22:33

Re: BFG QPR

by biff » 01 Apr 2018 19:06

Really proud of the whole team's showing. Although JvDB still made it painfully obvious he's a league out of his depth. And gunter needs to sort himself out defensively, as he cant seem to... defend. Though he did throw a ball forward once. Fair play.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4923
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: BFG QPR

by Lower West » 01 Apr 2018 19:15

biff Although JvDB still made it painfully obvious he's a league out of his depth. And gunter needs to sort himself out defensively, as he cant seem to... defend.


Hopefully we set a team up to play to it's strengths. Rather than a formation which so obviously doesn;t suit some of the current squad. JVB can play a pivotal role. Just needs to accept his own limitations.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39764
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: BFG QPR

by Snowflake Royal » 01 Apr 2018 19:26

Personally, I thought that with a better ref and better conditions we could have won that comfortably. I counted six cynical pull backs to stop breaks, four in the first half that went uncarded where we could have really hurt them, plus another couple where poorly weighted passes (I remember one in particular from Aluko) also would have had us away.

QPR had so much possession because a) we moved the ball front to back quickly with no dicking around and b) second half we settled in to see it out and just punted it back to them. I also remember some horrendous crosses and crossfield balls.

Different opinions and all, but I thought they looked exactly what they are, mid-table.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24965
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: BFG QPR

by Hound » 01 Apr 2018 19:46

They were a lot better than their league position imo Ian. They way they zipped it about in midfield and carried it forward was exceptional. Agreed they weren’t able to then carve out good chances (I don’t think they had many at all Zip) because we defended brilliantly though, and maybe they lacked something in the final third.

Seen plenty of bang average teams dominate us this year (Sheff Utd, Brentford etc) but they were definitely better than the average side that’s come here

It reminded me of the Fulham PO home game last year actually

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Norfolk Royal, RFCMod and 159 guests

It is currently 16 Apr 2024 12:43