by JR » 05 Jan 2019 10:10
by Elm Park Kid » 05 Jan 2019 10:30
JR 33/1 at Bet 365 for Reading to win - surely ridiculous odds for a two horse race.
Also, remember it will be Man United B vs Rejuvinated Reading.
There is also the effect of the shackles of the league relegation battle being released meaning players will be less likely to cut-out the silly errors.
Finally, a new manager in place with an attacking style means our squad players will be eager to impress.
Clearly on the face of it with form, club history and league position then 33/1 doesn’t sound crazy - but quite possibly worth a flutter when you delve a bit deeper?!
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Jan 2019 10:59
by Royal Rother » 05 Jan 2019 11:07
by LUX » 05 Jan 2019 11:09
by windermereROYAL » 05 Jan 2019 11:16
by Dr_Hfuhruhurr » 05 Jan 2019 11:16
JR 33/1 at Bet 365 for Reading to win - surely ridiculous odds for a two horse race.
by LUX » 05 Jan 2019 11:18
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Jan 2019 12:00
Royal Rother There have been many examples of struggling Champ clubs turning over lofty opponents so to my mind 33/1 is very generous.
Can I see it happening?
Absolutely not.
by Jackson Corner » 05 Jan 2019 12:32
by Snowball » 05 Jan 2019 12:41
by JR » 05 Jan 2019 14:05
by BR0B0T » 05 Jan 2019 14:59
Jackson Corner 330/1 I still wouldn’t put a quid on.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Jan 2019 17:51
BR0B0TJackson Corner 330/1 I still wouldn’t put a quid on.
then you don't understand probability
by JR » 05 Jan 2019 18:06
Snowflake RoyalBR0B0TJackson Corner 330/1 I still wouldn’t put a quid on.
then you don't understand probability
He understands the difference between a bookmaker that covers every game protecting themselves systemically and the actual chances of us winning that game... which were basically zero, hence no bet on us winning having any value.
by BR0B0T » 05 Jan 2019 18:14
JRSnowflake RoyalBR0B0T
then you don't understand probability
He understands the difference between a bookmaker that covers every game protecting themselves systemically and the actual chances of us winning that game... which were basically zero, hence no bet on us winning having any value.
If that game was replayed 20 times we would win at least 1 of them imho - hence 20/1 would have been sensible odds
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Jan 2019 18:19
JRSnowflake RoyalBR0B0T
then you don't understand probability
He understands the difference between a bookmaker that covers every game protecting themselves systemically and the actual chances of us winning that game... which were basically zero, hence no bet on us winning having any value.
If that game was replayed 20 times we would win at least 1 of them imho - hence 20/1 would have been sensible odds
by BR0B0T » 05 Jan 2019 18:22
Snowflake RoyalJRSnowflake Royal He understands the difference between a bookmaker that covers every game protecting themselves systemically and the actual chances of us winning that game... which were basically zero, hence no bet on us winning having any value.
If that game was replayed 20 times we would win at least 1 of them imho - hence 20/1 would have been sensible odds
It's not though. It's played once and we were never winning it.
by Royal Rother » 05 Jan 2019 20:25
by Dr_Hfuhruhurr » 06 Jan 2019 10:54