No Fixed Abode Nope. Nope. There is definitely no media bias towards Liverpool.
Kes what point are you actually trying to make?
No Fixed Abode Nope. Nope. There is definitely no media bias towards Liverpool.
by tmesis » 01 Jun 2017 21:52
Sutekhgenome RIP David Bobin
Recall David covering Reading when he was with TVS/Meridian in the early 90s. RIP.
double dNo Fixed Abode Nope. Nope. There is definitely no media bias towards Liverpool.
Kes what point are you actually trying to make?
by genome » 02 Jun 2017 09:43
genome Thought Tottenham's number would be higher. Seemed like they were on every week.
by 6ft Kerplunk » 02 Jun 2017 12:40
No Fixed Abode Liverpool were on TV more than anyone else.
by genome » 02 Jun 2017 13:52
by Sutekh » 02 Jun 2017 14:06
No Fixed Abodedouble dNo Fixed Abode Nope. Nope. There is definitely no media bias towards Liverpool.
Kes what point are you actually trying to make?
Liverpool were on TV more than anyone else.
genome Indeed. Liverpool have more fans = higher TV coverage. That's why Leeds always seem to be on way more than other Championship teams.
SutekhNo Fixed Abodedouble d
Kes what point are you actually trying to make?
Liverpool were on TV more than anyone else.
Only because their ineptitude against the "also rans" meant that their last game of the season happened to be the key game in the chase for 4th place
by BR0B0T » 02 Jun 2017 19:10
No Fixed AbodeSutekhNo Fixed Abode
Liverpool were on TV more than anyone else.
Only because their ineptitude against the "also rans" meant that their last game of the season happened to be the key game in the chase for 4th place
I was perplexed why they chose to show the Liv v Boro game on the last day. A clear home win, when Arsenal were at home to Everton. A game more neutrals would have preferred to watch.
by AthleticoSpizz » 02 Jun 2017 19:28
BR0B0TNo Fixed AbodeSutekh
Only because their ineptitude against the "also rans" meant that their last game of the season happened to be the key game in the chase for 4th place
I was perplexed why they chose to show the Liv v Boro game on the last day. A clear home win, when Arsenal were at home to Everton. A game more neutrals would have preferred to watch.
the only game with anything riding on it m9
by BR0B0T » 04 Jun 2017 17:55
No Fixed AbodeBR0B0TNo Fixed Abode
I was perplexed why they chose to show the Liv v Boro game on the last day. A clear home win, when Arsenal were at home to Everton. A game more neutrals would have preferred to watch.
the only game with anything riding on it m9
No - there was something riding on Arsenal v Everton too.
by Silver Fox » 05 Jun 2017 12:01
Silver Fox But the TV audiences are higher for their games than for Spurs games because they're better supported, as proven by the number of times you discover another Liverpool fan on here
by Victor Meldrew » 05 Jun 2017 12:21
No Fixed Abode But given a home win for Liverpool was a definite.......if it hadn't been a slightly higher calibre of team Liverpool were playing on the last day I would say fair enough.
I get that it's also about viewing figures. However, there needs to be a re-jigging of the prize money to negate someone getting more money through TV appearances. I don't think it's correct Spurs finishing 2nd yet getting less money than Liverpool and City.
Victor MeldrewNo Fixed Abode But given a home win for Liverpool was a definite.......if it hadn't been a slightly higher calibre of team Liverpool were playing on the last day I would say fair enough.
I get that it's also about viewing figures. However, there needs to be a re-jigging of the prize money to negate someone getting more money through TV appearances. I don't think it's correct Spurs finishing 2nd yet getting less money than Liverpool and City.
Bearing in mind Liverpool's dire record at home to the lesser sides it was far from being a definite-if they had won all of those "definites" they would have been champions rather than just the best when playing the best.
by Sutekh » 05 Jun 2017 14:25
No Fixed AbodeVictor MeldrewNo Fixed Abode But given a home win for Liverpool was a definite.......if it hadn't been a slightly higher calibre of team Liverpool were playing on the last day I would say fair enough.
I get that it's also about viewing figures. However, there needs to be a re-jigging of the prize money to negate someone getting more money through TV appearances. I don't think it's correct Spurs finishing 2nd yet getting less money than Liverpool and City.
Bearing in mind Liverpool's dire record at home to the lesser sides it was far from being a definite-if they had won all of those "definites" they would have been champions rather than just the best when playing the best.
IF
"Rather than just best when playing best" - well that's bias - but we know you're a LIverpool fan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests