by Hound » 25 Jan 2019 16:23
by Hendo » 25 Jan 2019 17:22
by Nameless » 25 Jan 2019 17:36
Hendo I would say 99% of people wouldn't recognise him either.
Hendo I would say 99% of people wouldn't recognise him either.
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Jan 2019 07:16
by Hendo » 26 Jan 2019 08:31
Old Man AndrewsHendo I would say 99% of people wouldn't recognise him either.
That's not the point. He's clearly lying, he saw nothing.
From Despair To Where? Surely we could all identify someone we don't recognise when they're wearing a hoodie and sat in the back seat of a car adjacent to us in stationary traffic.
Granted the wifi excuses are a bit weak but this is getting beyond obsession territory, OMA.
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Jan 2019 10:53
From Despair To Where? Surely we could all identify someone we don't recognise when they're wearing a hoodie and sat in the back seat of a car adjacent to us in stationary traffic.
Granted the wifi excuses are a bit weak but this is getting beyond obsession territory, OMA.
by TiagoIlori » 26 Jan 2019 12:13
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Jan 2019 12:27
Old Man AndrewsFrom Despair To Where? Surely we could all identify someone we don't recognise when they're wearing a hoodie and sat in the back seat of a car adjacent to us in stationary traffic.
Granted the wifi excuses are a bit weak but this is getting beyond obsession territory, OMA.
It's a thread designed to discuss local journalists. What would you like me to do other than comment in the local journalists?
From Despair To Where?Old Man AndrewsFrom Despair To Where? Surely we could all identify someone we don't recognise when they're wearing a hoodie and sat in the back seat of a car adjacent to us in stationary traffic.
Granted the wifi excuses are a bit weak but this is getting beyond obsession territory, OMA.
It's a thread designed to discuss local journalists. What would you like me to do other than comment in the local journalists?
There's discussion and there's nitpicking. If you're going to criticise, don't go all in like he's fcuked your dog on every minor thing. Not having reliable WiFi or 4G is a problem, not recognising a relatively unknown Chelsea U23 player who was not previously on our radar and we hadn't been linked with, really isn't that big a deal and maybe acknowledge that the quality of his output is directly linked to the quality of resources at his disposal.
Maybe you can do any better but, to be honest, like our local journos, a lot of your content doesn't hold up to a great deal of scrutiny either.
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Jan 2019 13:02
Old Man AndrewsFrom Despair To Where?Old Man Andrews
It's a thread designed to discuss local journalists. What would you like me to do other than comment in the local journalists?
There's discussion and there's nitpicking. If you're going to criticise, don't go all in like he's fcuked your dog on every minor thing. Not having reliable WiFi or 4G is a problem, not recognising a relatively unknown Chelsea U23 player who was not previously on our radar and we hadn't been linked with, really isn't that big a deal and maybe acknowledge that the quality of his output is directly linked to the quality of resources at his disposal.
Maybe you can do any better but, to be honest, like our local journos, a lot of your content doesn't hold up to a great deal of scrutiny either.
You're missing the point entirely. It's not the fact he didn't recognise the player it's that I believe he has completely made it up in the first place. If you wish to believe him that's fine.
by Wimb » 27 Jan 2019 13:20
Old Man Andrews
I want change and I want better local journalists reporting on the club I support, nothing wrong with that.
by RG30 » 31 Jan 2019 22:11
RG30 This tweet reminded me of this thread. Always got an excuse.
https://twitter.com/smudgersport/status/1091091997941739521?s=21
by TiagoIlori » 01 Feb 2019 03:34
by Mid Sussex Royal » 02 Feb 2019 20:47
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 204 guests