Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by (.)Boobies(.) » 09 Nov 2009 18:46

This is only speculation, but we did have interest in Darren Ferguson before Brendan Rodgers took the Reading hot seat. I believe we even made an approach but were told in no uncertain terms to politely be on our way. Ferguson has today left P'boro, and with mounting speculation over Brendan Rodgers position at the club, will we reignite our interest?

User avatar
Arnie_Pie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 13:43
Location: Purple Turtle

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Arnie_Pie » 09 Nov 2009 19:29

I highly doubt it, though wish we did.

Dorset-Knob
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: 20 Jul 2009 17:57
Location: The Biscuit Tin

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Dorset-Knob » 09 Nov 2009 19:32

His father rates him, but what the feck does he know?

andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4441
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by andrew1957 » 09 Nov 2009 19:35

(.)Boobies(.) This is only speculation, but we did have interest in Darren Ferguson before Brendan Rodgers took the Reading hot seat. I believe we even made an approach but were told in no uncertain terms to politely be on our way. Ferguson has today left P'boro, and with mounting speculation over Brendan Rodgers position at the club, will we reignite our interest?


Is that the same Darren Ferguson who is currently managing a team in 24th place or a different Darren Ferguson. Just why we would he be an improvement as he is no more proven at this level than Brendan Rodgers - in fact less so when you take into account BR's time at Chelsea and Watford.

User avatar
Harpers So Solid Crew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5273
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 08:39
Location: enjoying the money

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Harpers So Solid Crew » 09 Nov 2009 20:06

We could do worse than try to get George Boyd away from Peterborough.


North Eaat royal
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 15:59
Location: Part of that defence that didn't turn up after 2.45 on Sunday

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by North Eaat royal » 09 Nov 2009 23:17

andrew1957
(.)Boobies(.) This is only speculation, but we did have interest in Darren Ferguson before Brendan Rodgers took the Reading hot seat. I believe we even made an approach but were told in no uncertain terms to politely be on our way. Ferguson has today left P'boro, and with mounting speculation over Brendan Rodgers position at the club, will we reignite our interest?


Is that the same Darren Ferguson who is currently managing a team in 24th place or a different Darren Ferguson. Just why we would he be an improvement as he is no more proven at this level than Brendan Rodgers - in fact less so when you take into account BR's time at Chelsea and Watford.


We have better players than p'boro do so he'd have something better to work with. Would like to see it, but can't see the Mad man doing anything

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Barry the bird boggler » 10 Nov 2009 08:04

Don't people believe in econmising?! This is the 4th thread I've seen on Ferguson going, grrr :twisted:

User avatar
bobby m's syrup
Member
Posts: 583
Joined: 30 May 2004 23:03
Location: Amanzimtoti

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by bobby m's syrup » 10 Nov 2009 09:54

DF has a great record in the 2 lower leagues so why not?

Ryn
Member
Posts: 672
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 17:36
Location: Reading

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Ryn » 10 Nov 2009 11:13

2 successive promotions is a better record than a handful of games with Watford, agreed.

The Posh have had money though, which he wouldn't get a Reading.


Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Sun Tzu » 10 Nov 2009 11:22

Can't see this as a starter even

1. No sign that Rodgers is under threat

2. SJM has never been one for knee jerk reactions

3. If Rodgers did move on I could only see us going for someone with lots of experience and a safe pair of hands. No way would we look at another relatively unproven young Turk.

4. Ferguson has a worse record AT THIS LEVEL than Rodgers, and given that he's got a team that has been built over time and with decent investment you'd have to question what that says

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7369
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Alan Partridge » 10 Nov 2009 14:24

Sun Tzu Can't see this as a starter even

1. No sign that Rodgers is under threat

2. SJM has never been one for knee jerk reactions

3. If Rodgers did move on I could only see us going for someone with lots of experience and a safe pair of hands. No way would we look at another relatively unproven young Turk.

4. Ferguson has a worse record AT THIS LEVEL than Rodgers, and given that he's got a team that has been built over time and with decent investment you'd have to question what that says


Absolutely nothing.

What with Peterborough having basically the same squad from League 2, and the lowest wage bill in the division. Their expectation should have been to try and finish 4th bottom. I think this is an off field issue, maybe having shown interest elsewhere he hasn't had the same impact? No idea.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 10 Nov 2009 14:46

Alan Partridge
Sun Tzu Can't see this as a starter even

1. No sign that Rodgers is under threat

2. SJM has never been one for knee jerk reactions

3. If Rodgers did move on I could only see us going for someone with lots of experience and a safe pair of hands. No way would we look at another relatively unproven young Turk.

4. Ferguson has a worse record AT THIS LEVEL than Rodgers, and given that he's got a team that has been built over time and with decent investment you'd have to question what that says


Absolutely nothing.

What with Peterborough having basically the same squad from League 2, and the lowest wage bill in the division. Their expectation should have been to try and finish 4th bottom. I think this is an off field issue, maybe having shown interest elsewhere he hasn't had the same impact? No idea.


Clearly been banging Mrs Fry....

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Thaumagurist* » 10 Nov 2009 14:47

Does anyone think that, if we do go for Ferguson, it will be very much the same scenario when we sacked Bullivant and went back to Burns?

EDIT: Actually, let me correct myself, Bullivant quit rather than was sacked. :oops:


biscuitman
Member
Posts: 968
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 23:27

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by biscuitman » 10 Nov 2009 15:53

He wasn't our first choice. We only wanted to speak to Darren Ferguson, not to offer him the actual job...

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Ian Royal » 10 Nov 2009 20:16

biscuitman He wasn't our first choice. We only wanted to speak to Darren Ferguson, not to offer him the actual job...


And that makes him not first choice how? We asked permission to talk to him, that shows an interest. You can't offer someone a job until you've spoken to them about it.

I think he'll get a job elsewhere before our post becomes vacant. Unless we get battered in the next couple of games.

runrunrunrungilksey
Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 13:44

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by runrunrunrungilksey » 10 Nov 2009 21:30

Before the season started the RFC managers job proposed a fight for promotion, not a cost cutting excersise that is now well apparent and a main contributing factor to our current plight. I doubt he would even come near Reading!

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Ian Royal » 10 Nov 2009 21:35

runrunrunrungilksey Before the season started the RFC managers job proposed a fight for promotion, not a cost cutting excersise that is now well apparent and a main contributing factor to our current plight. I doubt he would even come near Reading!


No it didn't, it proposed a rebuilding job to be challenging for promotion within three years.

In fact I seem to recall SJM actually saying that he didn't expect Brendan to get us up this season and Brendan saying that whilst promotion was unlikely it was what he would be aiming for.

Looks like someone pulled the trigger before drawing and aiming doesn't it Brendan...

BR2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2138
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 13:53
Location: Bournemouth & Ringwood

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by BR2 » 11 Nov 2009 10:20

Sun Tzu Can't see this as a starter even

1. No sign that Rodgers is under threat

2. SJM has never been one for knee jerk reactions

3. If Rodgers did move on I could only see us going for someone with lots of experience and a safe pair of hands. No way would we look at another relatively unproven young Turk.

4. Ferguson has a worse record AT THIS LEVEL than Rodgers, and given that he's got a team that has been built over time and with decent investment you'd have to question what that says


Re(3)when Burns left didn't the club go for the inexperienced big mouth who is now at Southampton?
Re(4)the Peterboro team has been built by acquiring cheap non-league players whereas Rodgers spent £2 million on one player.
I always liked Ferguson as a player but I tend to agree that we do need an experienced man at the helm-interestingly that man (by virtue of being experienced) would have been sacked at some time by another club.

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by (.)Boobies(.) » 11 Nov 2009 10:54

BR2
Sun Tzu Can't see this as a starter even

1. No sign that Rodgers is under threat

2. SJM has never been one for knee jerk reactions

3. If Rodgers did move on I could only see us going for someone with lots of experience and a safe pair of hands. No way would we look at another relatively unproven young Turk.

4. Ferguson has a worse record AT THIS LEVEL than Rodgers, and given that he's got a team that has been built over time and with decent investment you'd have to question what that says


Re(3)when Burns left didn't the club go for the inexperienced big mouth who is now at Southampton?
Re(4)the Peterboro team has been built by acquiring cheap non-league players whereas Rodgers spent £2 million on one player.
I always liked Ferguson as a player but I tend to agree that we do need an experienced man at the helm-interestingly that man (by virtue of being experienced) would have been sacked at some time by another club.


Interestingly, although many say P'boro have spent a lot, they really haven't over the last few years. Indeed many of their current playing staff are from L1, L2, non-league (Fisher Athletic, Dag & Red, Hampton & Richmond. Ebbsfleet, Weymouth - just five of the many non league clubs that have produced players that have, according to theposh, been a revelation) and in one case, an almost unknown Scottish club called Cove Island ["Who are they?" "Exactly"]. There's also a fair few youngsters that have made the step up. They also have a few players loaned in from L2 and non-league.

Players purchased for a fee - source http://www.theposh.com

Joe Lewis GK - £400,000
George Boyd ST - £250,000
Tommy Rowe MF - Undisclosed (from Stockport County)
Toumani Diagourage MF - Undisclosed (from Hereford United)
Sergio Torres W - £200,000

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Speculation only: Darren Ferguson

by Deathy » 11 Nov 2009 17:10

Fry alledges Ferguson was tapped up, and Sky think he's on his way to Hull.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests

It is currently 17 Aug 2025 18:48