by Alexander Litvinenko »
08 Sep 2012 12:20
Royal Lady Anyway, fact of the matter is, STAR don't like HNA and give HNA members no credence when it comes to things RFC - so that's the end of it, really.
It's a shame making generalisations isn't an Olympic event - that'd be another gold medal in the bag for sure!
"STAR" is individuals, not a single entity that has a single set of views. Opinions of HNA vary amongst individuals, I'm sure.
The experience some have had is that they get abused by anonymous people here - how do they know who is a WUM and who is genuine, without spending half their lives here to know the individuals concerned? How do they know what is a serious issue and what is petty/trivial/untrue/a wind-up?
Taking something to the club when they can't be sure it actually happened or they don't know who it actually happened to is just asking for trouble, so I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask someone to actually identify themselves (in confidence) before taking an issue forward.
And if someone can't be bothered to send one simple email to STAR about an issue, surely that means that the issue isn't of that much importance to them?