by CountryRoyal » 27 Sep 2017 07:12
by Snowflake Royal » 27 Sep 2017 08:50
by Snowball » 28 Sep 2017 06:29
by Snowball » 30 Sep 2017 19:27
by Snowball » 16 Oct 2017 19:17
by Snowball » 16 Oct 2017 19:18
by Hound » 17 Oct 2017 12:37
by CountryRoyal » 17 Oct 2017 12:55
by John Smith » 17 Oct 2017 13:09
by Snowball » 18 Oct 2017 11:02
by CountryRoyal » 19 Oct 2017 09:27
Snowball It's not my job to scour the internet for comments, FFS
As it is we get scores with RFC first when away (and the reverse)
Sometimes I can only work out the winning team from scorers given etc
Without checking I thought correct scorer only counted if the score was also correct
by Snowball » 19 Oct 2017 09:39
by CountryRoyal » 19 Oct 2017 11:22
Snowball I checked the rules which state
3 points for correct result
5 points for correct result with first scorer
Happy to change if people ask for it
PS That means Hound got 6 not 7
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Oct 2017 17:22
by Snowball » 19 Oct 2017 18:44
by Snowball » 19 Oct 2017 18:44
by Snowball » 19 Oct 2017 18:45
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Oct 2017 23:33
Snowball Snowflake, I have been opening the last few predictions threads with the post saying "same rules as last time"
I added HT SCORE/RESULT FOR EXTRA INTEREST, especially as (then) we hadn't scored in the first half
I clarified first scorer as first READING scorer because I don't give a flying monkey's fart who scores against us
I also added extra points for multiple scorers, if they are in the right order
Frankly if someone predicts
Reading 1-0 HT
Reading 3-1 FT
Aluko, Bod, Swift (for example) and gets everything right, they DESERVE a shedload of points.
No-one is forced to play and anyone can take over and run the comp and apply whatever rules they so desire
I think I might start deducting points for moaning
I figure you are currently -268 points
by Snowball » 20 Oct 2017 03:45
by Snowball » 21 Oct 2017 19:41
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], hobbitx007, rabidbee, Vicky Pollard and 342 guests