by Hound » 06 Nov 2018 18:09
by maffff » 06 Nov 2018 18:26
by Snowflake Royal » 06 Nov 2018 20:13
by Ascotexgunner » 06 Nov 2018 21:13
by glass half full » 06 Nov 2018 21:20
Ascotexgunner I quite liked the idea but I think he would be a gamble. This squad is poor and low on confidence, and needs a much stronger personality. I'm not sure he has impressed me enough during Fulham's woes.
by Ascotexgunner » 06 Nov 2018 21:25
glass half fullAscotexgunner I quite liked the idea but I think he would be a gamble. This squad is poor and low on confidence, and needs a much stronger personality. I'm not sure he has impressed me enough during Fulham's woes.
He could bring Sessegnon with him....
by Eaststandman » 06 Nov 2018 21:27
by Brain Traysers » 06 Nov 2018 23:27
by Brain Traysers » 07 Nov 2018 00:05
Kulshaw72RFC We are 2nd highest scorers in the league ?!
Brain TraysersKulshaw72RFC We are 2nd highest scorers in the league ?!
oh - no not at all it seems... Fake news on my part, apols. We rank 10th overall... (not sure where I got 2nd from)
FWIW only 3 teams (WBA, Preston and Sheff Weds) have had higher scoring games than the 3.1 goals we average.
Either way, on a xG basis we are 21st - we have been surprisingly efficient in front of goal
by windermereROYAL » 07 Nov 2018 08:54
Kulshaw72RFCBrain TraysersKulshaw72RFC We are 2nd highest scorers in the league ?!
oh - no not at all it seems... Fake news on my part, apols. We rank 10th overall... (not sure where I got 2nd from)
FWIW only 3 teams (WBA, Preston and Sheff Weds) have had higher scoring games than the 3.1 goals we average.
Either way, on a xG basis we are 21st - we have been surprisingly efficient in front of goal
We are 10th highest scorers in the league ?!
by Hendo » 08 Nov 2018 10:05
Kulshaw72RFCBrain TraysersKulshaw72RFC We are 2nd highest scorers in the league ?!
oh - no not at all it seems... Fake news on my part, apols. We rank 10th overall... (not sure where I got 2nd from)
FWIW only 3 teams (WBA, Preston and Sheff Weds) have had higher scoring games than the 3.1 goals we average.
Either way, on a xG basis we are 21st - we have been surprisingly efficient in front of goal
We are 10th highest scorers in the league ?!
by John Smith » 08 Nov 2018 12:19
Hendo
Not really that surprising, don't think we have struggled in front of goal at all this year. It is letting them in at the other end which is an issue.
We have only failed to score in 4 league games this season (5 if you include Watford).
by Hound » 08 Nov 2018 13:23
by muirinho » 08 Nov 2018 15:03
Hound saw Something on Sky saying we were bottom of the table in XG goal difference over the season.
Don't think Fulham really spent that much tbh, and they were useless when he took over
Over the last five years Fulham have bought players for £101 million and generated sales of £63 million.
by John Smith » 08 Nov 2018 15:20
muirinho Also worth considering is that in the season when Jakonovic was appointed, they were 12th when Kit Symons was sacked, but ended up in 20th place. so they were middle of the road when he took over, and he made them considerably worse, before they got better.
By that reckoning, Jakonovic would relegate us for sure, and I certainly can't see him hanging around to get us promoted.
thanks, but no thanks.
by Stranded » 09 Nov 2018 09:49
Hound saw Something on Sky saying we were bottom of the table in XG goal difference over the season.
Don't think Fulham really spent that much tbh, and they were useless when he took over
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Nov 2018 09:24
StrandedHound saw Something on Sky saying we were bottom of the table in XG goal difference over the season.
Don't think Fulham really spent that much tbh, and they were useless when he took over
We are down there but all that really means is when we give up a chance it is a bloody good one (or letting teams have a lot of shots) but we are taking a larger percentage of the chances we are making.
by sandman » 10 Nov 2018 12:18
Snowflake RoyalStrandedHound saw Something on Sky saying we were bottom of the table in XG goal difference over the season.
Don't think Fulham really spent that much tbh, and they were useless when he took over
We are down there but all that really means is when we give up a chance it is a bloody good one (or letting teams have a lot of shots) but we are taking a larger percentage of the chances we are making.
I'm always rather suspicious about expected goals. It seems a bit too faddy and unable to take account of quite important variables.
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry and 156 guests