by Lighthouse » 19 Jun 2025 07:24
by Crusader Royal » 19 Jun 2025 08:53
by Sutekh » 19 Jun 2025 08:55
by Crusader Royal » 19 Jun 2025 09:03
Sutekh Actually we’re placed at 613th but equal 609th.
https://theanalyst.com/articles/who-are ... r-rankings
Luton (probably unsurprisingly) are the best of the current L1 sides at 238th (equal 236th). Stockport are best of the current L1 sides (374th, equal 373rd) that played at that level last season.
by Mr Angry » 19 Jun 2025 09:08
Crusader Royal I believe Auckland, who lost 10-0 to Michael Olise’s Bayern Munich at the World Apathy Cup recently are ranked somewhere in the 5,000s.
by Brogue » 19 Jun 2025 09:16
by Armadillo Roadkill » 19 Jun 2025 10:44
Brogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
by parky » 19 Jun 2025 10:54
by Pepe the Horseman » 19 Jun 2025 13:18
Brogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
by Hendo » 19 Jun 2025 14:32
Pepe the HorsemanBrogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
by parky » 19 Jun 2025 14:43
Pepe the HorsemanBrogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
by Pepe the Horseman » 19 Jun 2025 15:32
HendoPepe the HorsemanBrogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
We'd still be drawn away to Huddersfield in the first round.
by Pepe the Horseman » 19 Jun 2025 15:32
parkyPepe the HorsemanBrogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
I actually really like this idea. Make the CWC a straight knockout tournament. The top 1024 teams based on those rankings qualify and it's a random draw right the way to the final. The higher ranked team always gets to play at home. Would only need 10 weeks to play it.
by Armadillo Roadkill » 19 Jun 2025 15:32
by Sutekh » 19 Jun 2025 16:23
Pepe the HorsemanparkyPepe the Horseman This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
I actually really like this idea. Make the CWC a straight knockout tournament. The top 1024 teams based on those rankings qualify and it's a random draw right the way to the final. The higher ranked team always gets to play at home. Would only need 10 weeks to play it.
I don't like it.
I LOVE IT!
by Crusader Royal » 19 Jun 2025 16:39
by tmesis » 19 Jun 2025 18:04
parkyPepe the HorsemanBrogue I don’t think there are 600 odd better teams than us in the world.
This is why the Club World Cup should include everyone.
I actually really like this idea. Make the CWC a straight knockout tournament. The top 1024 teams based on those rankings qualify and it's a random draw right the way to the final. The higher ranked team always gets to play at home. Would only need 10 weeks to play it.
by Carnabyswhiskers » 19 Jun 2025 23:42
Armadillo Roadkill At first I thought the title of the thread was a question.
The answer to which would be Brazil's World Cup squad of 1982.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests