Premiership strategy for growth?

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 09:58

(allegedly, and with apologies to Scott Adams)

Z-Head · by **Z-Head** » 23 Feb 2007 10:05

Correct me if im wrong. But just how is this team news?

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 10:07

Z-Head Correct me if im wrong. But just how is this team news?

The forum for discussion on the team, the management, and matches.

Z-Head · by **Z-Head** » 23 Feb 2007 10:13

Ok. my bad, I guess!

Just seams more like club politics, general football or anything else.

Or bollocks!

Stooper · by **Stooper** » 23 Feb 2007 10:17

Z-Head Ok. my bad, I guess!

Just seams more like club politics, general football or anything else.

Or bollocks!

Or Policies even

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 10:20

Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in

strap · by **strap** » 23 Feb 2007 10:48

PieEater Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in

Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?

Ian Royal · by **Ian Royal** » 23 Feb 2007 10:56

Oh woe is me my seat might get moved. At least you have a seat and can get to games you bastards. if you don't like it there are plenty of people who will happily take the problem off your hands.

zac naloen · by **zac naloen** » 23 Feb 2007 11:10

I can't understand how you've equated the moving of the seat you occupy for disabled seating too "I'm being kicked out of the east stand"... especially when they are adding a few thousand more seats

.

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 11:41

Different thread Zac, but I'm sure you can see the "big club" parallels.

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 11:48

strap
PieEater Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in

Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?

It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.

zac naloen · by **zac naloen** » 23 Feb 2007 12:02

PieEater Different thread Zac, but I'm sure you can see the "big club" parallels.

I can see the "Club is increasing capacity and therefore legally needs to increase the disabled and hospitality seating" parallels.

Platypuss · by **Platypuss** » 23 Feb 2007 13:11

PieEater
Z-Head Correct me if im wrong. But just how is this team news?

The forum for discussion on the team, the management, and matches.

Meaning Steve Coppell and the football management side.

This is clearly a club policy topic - in fact it is hard to think of a more club policy subject.

Royal Lady · by **Royal Lady** » 23 Feb 2007 13:17

PieEater
strap
PieEater Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in

Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?

It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.

Woah there! That includes our seats.

Mind you at least it will mean the moaners behind us will have to move as well and the chances of us having to sit near them again are marginal - hoorah!

Coppelled Streets · by **Coppelled Streets** » 23 Feb 2007 13:20

Royal Lady
PieEater
strap
PieEater Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in

Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?

It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.
Woah there! That includes our seats. Mind you at least it will mean the moaners behind us will have to move as well and the chances of us having to sit near them again are marginal - hoorah!

I'm sure you would get the pick of seats in the new upper east stand. You'd be maybe 6 rows back or something.

Royal Lady · by **Royal Lady** » 23 Feb 2007 13:22

I don't really want to go in the Upper stand bit - and surely the cost of seats there will be more expensive won't they, like the Upper West??

Royal Lady · by **Royal Lady** » 23 Feb 2007 13:50

Actually - having now remembered my alphabet - we're in Row W - the moaners are in X - so we can stay where we are and they'll be GONE!!!

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 14:39

Coppelled Streets I'm sure you would get the pick of seats in the new upper east stand. You'd be maybe 6 rows back or something.

I think 12-14 rows up will most likely shift.... (X/Y to LL), a cut and paste, it's 6 if everyone moves back (X/Y to EE), i.e a shuffle.

Coppelled Streets · by **Coppelled Streets** » 23 Feb 2007 14:44

Royal Lady surely the cost of seats there will be more expensive won't they, like the Upper West??

If the football club have to relocate season ticket holders because of the redevelopment, the fans wont be paying anything extra! There seat will cost the same as it would have done had they still been in the 'lower' east stand. That would only be the case for one season though I'm sure.

PieEater · by **PieEater** » 23 Feb 2007 14:47

It's all one stand, just two concourses. There is no split like the upper and lower west

Premiership strategy for growth?

Premiership strategy for growth?

Who is online