by andrew1957 » 24 Nov 2008 16:33
by papereyes » 24 Nov 2008 17:03
andrew1957 I was as gutted as anyone on Saturday but to be fair if in August I could have taken 33 points after the first 18 games of the season I would have grabbed it.
Yes the team were poor on Saturday but we still have a great chance of promotion. It was never going to be like 2005/6 again.
by SCIAG » 24 Nov 2008 20:22
Hoop BlahSCIAG Well, it's not. I'll have to type up the story. My nephew went to primary school (also secondary) with Stewart, and in their last year Stephen Hunt visited the school. We have a picture that was in the Post, and Stewart is in it, as is Hunt. Hunt signed autographs for every child in their year.
To be honest that really isn't the same as knowing him though is it?
How many kids do Reading players meet over a year?
It's a tragic loss, but the players have pretty much come out and said they didn't know him but it's still a reality check for all of them, and an obviously heart wrenching loss for his family and friends. To put it forward as a possible reason for the appalling performance is really clutching at straws.
by Ian Royal » 24 Nov 2008 21:00
by readingbedding » 24 Nov 2008 21:48
by londinium » 24 Nov 2008 21:48
Ian Royal I'm not arguing it's a major contributory factor either, but it can't be ruled out as having some influence. Lets not forget that this is likely to have effected the whole atmosphere at the club for many more than just the first teamers.
That atmosphere could have translated to them. You can't compare it to a relative of one player either. Thats something that only one person experiences, the whole squad is likely to rally round. But in this case it was someone involved in the club, therefore most at the club would have had some connection to the shock and distress. This would potentially leave less of culture of support, as everyone needed it to a certain greater or lesser degree.
It's a shock hearing that someone you have a connection to, no matter how small has died, especially at that age. Different people deal with this things differently and are affected to different degrees.
There will have been disruption.
by S09Royal » 24 Nov 2008 22:10
londiniumIan Royal I'm not arguing it's a major contributory factor either, but it can't be ruled out as having some influence. Lets not forget that this is likely to have effected the whole atmosphere at the club for many more than just the first teamers.
That atmosphere could have translated to them. You can't compare it to a relative of one player either. Thats something that only one person experiences, the whole squad is likely to rally round. But in this case it was someone involved in the club, therefore most at the club would have had some connection to the shock and distress. This would potentially leave less of culture of support, as everyone needed it to a certain greater or lesser degree.
It's a shock hearing that someone you have a connection to, no matter how small has died, especially at that age. Different people deal with this things differently and are affected to different degrees.
There will have been disruption.
I would say the Internatinal break was a bigger influence.
3 International breaks this season 3 defeats in games straight after the break!!!
by Gordons Cumming » 24 Nov 2008 22:42
by andrew1957 » 24 Nov 2008 23:18
papereyesandrew1957 I was as gutted as anyone on Saturday but to be fair if in August I could have taken 33 points after the first 18 games of the season I would have grabbed it.
Yes the team were poor on Saturday but we still have a great chance of promotion. It was never going to be like 2005/6 again.
According to you, it was going to be better.
by Mr Angry » 25 Nov 2008 08:47
andrew1957papereyesandrew1957 I was as gutted as anyone on Saturday but to be fair if in August I could have taken 33 points after the first 18 games of the season I would have grabbed it.
Yes the team were poor on Saturday but we still have a great chance of promotion. It was never going to be like 2005/6 again.
According to you, it was going to be better.
What I have said all along is consistent. I believe that 2005/6 was a fluke season in many ways. That season we narrowly won or drew many games and it was sheer momentum that kept us going. The few teams we beat comfortably were usually struggling ones. The current squad on the other hand at its best steamroller even other good teams (Wolves, Bristol City, Swansea etc) but if we go behind at present we look vulnerable. We seem to be having more problem beating lower ranked teams than top teams.
I still think this squad has the bed rock of players needed to survive in the PL for more than the 2 seasons we achieved last time round. Time will tell.
by Wimb » 25 Nov 2008 11:18
by Vision » 25 Nov 2008 11:40
Wimb I won't pretend I've seen every game this year, I'm stuck in Cornwall so my opinions are based on highlights, radio and reviews but this season reminds me of 00/01. At times Cureton and Butler are banging in goals for fun and looking like we own the division, only to come unstuck against far weaker sides (i.e Colchester twice, Northampton) and ultimatly just miss out on the top 2
In my eyes the side was far more entertaining that season then the following year when we went up, but the guys from 01 needed to learn how to gut it out at the top of the division first and that helped form the foundations success in 02.
Obviously this squad is totally different to Pards team that year in terms of what they are used too/where they have come from, but even so I can't help but think that this team will fall short because they don't have the recent experience of playing dogged and determined sides.
Still I don't think the time has come to panic and we'll still be in the thick of it come May, I'm just not sure where in the top 6 it'll be
by Ian Royal » 25 Nov 2008 12:22
by loyalroyal4life » 25 Nov 2008 13:09
Gordons Cumming Southampton game was just a hiccup. That's all.
Look out, Cardiff!!!
by floyd__streete » 26 Nov 2008 01:17
Ian Royal We're still suffering the mental scars of getting a kicking last season. Our confidence is very fragile. We know we're great, but the doubts set in if we don't score early or go behind. Then it's panic stations and trying too hard. When we relax and enjoy ourselves we're almost unbeatable.
Under pressure with tension we're rather shakey.
by Millsy » 26 Nov 2008 04:09
floyd__streete Well maybe that thrashing today will do us some favours in the long term. We're not Brazil - we were closer to being Barnet today - so we were never going to go through the long season unbeaten at home in such a competitive league. It might bring some amongst us down to earth too; three wins on the spin had already toasting promotion it seemed and some of the fanciful predictions on another thread belied Southampton's good away form and the fact that we simply aint nowehere near as good as some of you think we are.
Southampton were one of the few teams to come to Reading and try and pass the ball about, and just like against Doncaster and the second half against Swansea we truly struggled. Some of their movement, passing and little flicks were a joy to behold and they were a class above us all game. No complaints at all today - the referee performed well and Southampton played honestly and openly. My only reservations tonight are with the management; Harper on for 80 anonymous minutes? No half time changes having been played off the park in an ineffective opening 45 minutes? Long on for half an hour of the usual honest endeavour with negligible quality? The players can take a look at themselves too; Hahnemann inexplicably failing to come for the first cross for the opening goal for instance, Bikey's showboating bordering on sloppiness. And there is a complete absence of leaders on the pitch for Reading when things go badly wrong as they did today. Not good to watch, but a timely reminder that we aren't head and shoulders above this division like we were 3 years ago.
I fail to see why Jimmy Kebe is hyped up so much to be honest. From a winger you want end product and I cannot recall a single decent cross from him today. Sure, he's pacy but he runs himself down blind alleys and struggles to stay on his feet half the time; if you want to watch a pacy athlete go to Crystal Palace for the sprints, give me a footballer like Glenn Little every time. Luckily for Kebe, as long as Rosenior is playing he won't be the worst player on the pitch; England's right back was atrocious in every department again today, if only he could play football half as well as he talks to the media. Our right side today failed throughout ninety minutes with the exception of any unusually accurate finish at the end of some excellent work by the industrious Doyle who was a class above anything else we had today.
This season was always going to be one of transition and I comfortable and satisfied with where we are the moment. We will finish in the top six and we will win many more than we lose, which is a pretty decent effort. Our squad is a decent one at this level but would we cope in the Premier League? Absolutely not, this isn't remotely as good a side as the one we had three years ago - James Harper's performances, for instance, show what a good player Steve Sidwell was/is.
floyd__streete Wolves are pulling away and the difference between us and Birmingham is that when they are 2-1 down their impact sub is Kevin Phllips. And ours is Shane Long.
Users browsing this forum: Chameleon, LightwaterRoyal, Mid Sussex Royal, Royal Ginger and 508 guests