by OLLIE KEARNS » 28 Jan 2012 21:19
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 28 Jan 2012 21:20
Ian RoyalHarpers So Solid CrewIan Royal I'm surprised with some of the negativity seeing as we managed about 17 shots and most professional reports I've heard / seen say we missed some chances we really should have put away.
Obviously missing easier chances is not great, but still. Especially with two key players out injured, yet another new striker partnership and a right back at left back.
I think I will go with people that were actually there, seems all season we have been generally poor reading the back from the game threads, it is not always the same players picked out, but few have been outstanding all season in these threads. For someone that does not attend, and reading what those do say i would say that many players have decent games, but are not consistent, too many drift out of games, doesn't sound like they put in a full shift week in and week out.
Big difference to 2005/06.
Ian what do you consider a professional report? as most are all from the same person, or does Lawro count, who suggested we would lose every game in the Prem judging by his weekly predictions was back when. Or the Telegraph, who did not even report our takeover the day after it happened, or the Daily Mail who often dont bother reporting our games, unless we play WHU.
Dellor, Gooding, Williams, Nicholas, Papers. All taken with a pinch of salt of course.
Didn't say reports on here weren't accurate, just I'm surprised considering. And why would you bring 05/06 into? That season was 1 in a million.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 28 Jan 2012 21:22
West Stand Man I love the 'somehow we are in 4th'.
8 wins in 11 league games is pushing on for a 106 point season (if it was consistent). That is the somehow.
by robinsfriday » 28 Jan 2012 21:47
Harpers So Solid CrewWest Stand Man I love the 'somehow we are in 4th'.
8 wins in 11 league games is pushing on for a 106 point season (if it was consistent). That is the somehow.
100.36 points
by Jinx » 28 Jan 2012 21:49
by Avon Royal » 28 Jan 2012 21:58
by Ian Royal » 28 Jan 2012 22:24
robinsfridayIan Royalrobinsfriday I am extremely chilled 'pal'. But your post is pointless. You question those who were there, yet your judgement of the game is based on statistics shown on a website. You can have 55% of possession but it doesn't mean you deserve to win a game of football. It was poor, but by no means as poor as it was against Watford but nowhere near as good as we have shown against other teams this season. It was a 6/10 performance. I'm pleased because a) we won and got 3 points b) Roberts scored on his debut and shows good promise c) we are now 4th in the league and finally d) Anton is flying over for the home game against Coventry.
Winds me up when those who were not at the game (and rarely are) think they can defend a poor performance.
Get over yourself. It was an expression of surprise, not a defence of any performance. Not an disagreement with what's been posted. Although I know which posters to generally trust the opinions of from their views on the games I have seen.
Stop reading too much into it and getting your knickers in a twist.
Not wearing knickers mate. To me a 6/10 is a below average performance. We could debate all night what constitutes an average performance in regards to a marking system out of ten points but quite frankly I have better things to do. Personally, 6/10 is a poor mark. Sorry if you don't agree.
by dogzbollox » 28 Jan 2012 22:29
Snowball 9 James
8.5 The Bristol City side average
Thought they were good enough for top six and unlucky to lose. Better than Hull
8 Feds. Solid and kept us in game
8 Cummings.
8 Gorks. Had a lot of the game, good headers, calm on the ball. Must average 2 points per game more than Matt Mills
7 Pearce. Don't remember much wrong
8 Griffin. Loads of support work, seemed up for it.
8 Tabb . Worked hard, loads of tackles, headers won
7.5 Karacan Everwhere esp in last 30 mins
7.0 McAnuff Plenty of decent work but nothing "great"
7.5 Antonio Decent, and will improve a lot if he plays. Got better later
8 Hunt. Worked hard, played intelligently, partnered Roberts well
7.5 Roberts. A class apart. Only lower score because not fully fit, will soon get regular 9s IMO. Tried a bit too hard at times. Poor pen but great follow up. 2-3 superb thru balls
6 Church Ran, but the step-down from Roberts was svcary
8 CRXWZXYA (or whoever) Very little time but made one great ball from the RB position, one great "skin" of a defender, and made a penalty. V Promising
by PieEater » 28 Jan 2012 22:34
by Handsome Man » 28 Jan 2012 22:42
by Ian Royal » 28 Jan 2012 22:43
by TBM » 28 Jan 2012 22:45
by rhroyal » 28 Jan 2012 22:59
by Jackson Corner » 29 Jan 2012 01:39
by Winnershroyal » 29 Jan 2012 06:24
Jackson Corner I'm just glad we are not 4th from bottom! What a bunch of miserable f*****rs. Today wasn't great but I thought we were good value for the win against a decent Brizzle team who are much better than there league position. Roberts did more today than Les Fedinand did in his entire Reading career. Some decent solid performances with key players to come back. 3 points a clean sheet up to 4th and we are still not playing at our best! If your not happy with that then piss off down the pub and support Man City.
by Wizard » 29 Jan 2012 06:26
by SHORT AND CURLY » 29 Jan 2012 07:13
by Tilehurst End » 29 Jan 2012 07:56
by Maguire » 29 Jan 2012 08:26
by Royal Lady » 29 Jan 2012 08:42
Users browsing this forum: Keysfield, Snowflake Royal and 367 guests