by howser » 16 Jan 2016 22:50
by pwb » 16 Jan 2016 23:18
AthleticoSpizz lol......maybe they are.....that's why we are where we are
by AthleticoSpizz » 16 Jan 2016 23:20
by paddy20 » 16 Jan 2016 23:25
pwbAthleticoSpizz lol......maybe they are.....that's why we are where we are
Unfortunately they are not being allowed to! Open your eyes, why did it take so long to appoint McDermott, because that's how long it took for Sir John and his cronies to persuade them to bring him back. The Thais wanted their own man and ended up with another waste of space and more wasted money. It will all end in tears.
Cut the apron string Sir John before it's too late!
by Ian Royal » 16 Jan 2016 23:51
AthleticoSpizz .....which calls the question.....just what do we want?
Yes it'd be nice to be Leicester City right now......but they'll be tomorrow's Bolton.
Think we need to stick with a manager for more than a year or two regardless of league(s) position
by Ian Royal » 16 Jan 2016 23:59
Longhorn1970jojo1 considering we were 7th when jock strap went and now we are 12th i would have to with hold my judgment
Pretty much sums it up, I'll take 7th place, all this bullsh*t about BM inheriting someone else's team is rubbish. He knew who was here and what he had to work with, and on what budget (nil), he didn't have to take the job on those terms. Teams came here in Sep and October and said we were the best they had played, we weren't exactly doomed !
by AthleticoSpizz » 17 Jan 2016 00:08
by Royal Ginger » 17 Jan 2016 01:40
by Denver Royal » 17 Jan 2016 02:02
Ian Royal We should do what we usually do, which is stick by a manager who has a clear commitment to the club.
by Royal Ginger » 17 Jan 2016 02:07
by sandman » 17 Jan 2016 08:38
by Ian Royal » 17 Jan 2016 10:30
Denver RoyalIan Royal We should do what we usually do, which is stick by a manager who has a clear commitment to the club.
When we hired Atkins and Clarke, did they strike you as guys that would have a 'clear commitment to the club'?
by RoyalinBracknell » 17 Jan 2016 11:00
by Sutekh » 17 Jan 2016 11:18
by RoyalBlue » 17 Jan 2016 11:28
RoyalinBracknell Delighted to have him back. Feel a closer connection to the club since his return. Yesterday was the biggest disappointment so far but it will take time. If we give him three years I'm confident he'll get us promoted again.
by RoyalinBracknell » 17 Jan 2016 11:37
RoyalBlueRoyalinBracknell Delighted to have him back. Feel a closer connection to the club since his return. Yesterday was the biggest disappointment so far but it will take time. If we give him three years I'm confident he'll get us promoted again.
Unfortunately I think that promotion would be more likely to be from League 1. He's a one trick pony and when the 'togetherness' doesn't work, he is lost.
by RoyalX » 17 Jan 2016 11:40
RoyalBlueRoyalinBracknell Delighted to have him back. Feel a closer connection to the club since his return. Yesterday was the biggest disappointment so far but it will take time. If we give him three years I'm confident he'll get us promoted again.
Unfortunately I think that promotion would more likely be from League 1. He's a one trick pony and when the 'togetherness' doesn't work, he is lost.
by Extended-Phenotype » 17 Jan 2016 11:58
by leon » 17 Jan 2016 12:10
Extended-Phenotype You have to remember two managers previous failed to get the team to click over several seasons. Brian has had only a few games.
It's obviously a difficult job and tbf we have seen some improvement in performance.
My only beef with McD so far has been team selection but tbh I'm starting to think his hands have been tied with Vydra and that there is more to the story with Sa than we know about.
by Lower West » 17 Jan 2016 12:18
Extended-Phenotype My only beef with McD so far has been team selection but tbh I'm starting to think his hands have been tied with Vydra and that there is more to the story with Sa than we know about.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Bing [Bot], Royals and Racers and 484 guests