time for mooney?

[RoyalBlue]

How many times do you need to be told - THERE'S NO EFFIN' MOONEY!

I was just looking through the FAQ to see if I could find grounds to get the Sack the Board thread removed, sadly I found there is no sanity clause.

And rightly so, given that many might question the sanity of some of the other Board's actions.

[howser]

He has been unfortunate not to get a chance here, although if he was totally useless he would still be too good for this shower of shit that is Reading Fc nowadays.

[facaldaqui]

He's been doing OK for Charlton, from what I can see on highlights--and they are probably a better team than us at the moment.

[Southbank Old Boy]

I saw enough to realise he just aint good enough to make a difference for us

Get him off the wage bill, and bring in a bit of a transfer fee if at all possible

But he was good enough for Norwich, where he banged in the goals. Though they got relegated, he still made a difference to their team in the same situation as us, this time last year.

And any striker worth their salt will put decent oppertunities away, its the rest of the team who has to create them. Is Church / Rasiak / Long guilty of missing gilt edge chances? Could Mooney do better? Well he won't if he's not playing.

What he said.

Mooney scored a few for Norwich yes, but Church has score a few for us, Rasiak has scored at a good enough rate too, Long has scored at a decent rate in the past (I dont expect him to repeat that btw) that doesnt mean they are good enough to turn our season round

From what I saw of Mooney he isnt better than what we have, scoring a few for Norwich doesnt change that

Mooney would also need to play instead of Rasiak if you ask me, both need someone alongside them to add a bit of running and strength. I cant Mooney being better than Rasiak, the one forward who is capable of scoring goals at this level, and I dont even think he offers enough to be on the bench because we need players BETTER than the ones we have, not worse

[Ian Royal]

Mooney certainly isn't going to be better than Rasiak or Church, but when we only had Rasiak available and had a couple of games in quick succession, he should have been brought back.

It must surely be hard to argue that one striker on the pitch and none on the bench is a better option than bringing Mooney back if only for a couple of games.

[YateleyRoyal]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 08,00.html

Parky reveals that Mooney can stay til the end of the season....fail for us

[Royalee]

Two goals in eleven appearances is pretty poor at that level considering there are some clamouring for us to recall him.

[readingbedding]

Good luck to him I say.

[UpNorth]

Confirmation of what the club have been saying recently. When he is fit again he can return to Charlton.

[Terminal Boardom]

The best of luck to him wherever he goes cos he has never been given a chance to show the supporters what he can do.

[Wycombe Royal]

The best of luck to him wherever he goes cos he has never been given a chance to show the supporters what he can do.

No, but he's shown the supporters of other clubs what he can do and that hasnt amounted to too much......

[Royalee]

The best of luck to him wherever he goes cos he has never been given a chance to show the supporters what he can do.

No, but he's shown the supporters of other clubs what he can do and that hasnt amounted to too much......

Indeed.

[FiNeRaIn]

The best of luck to him wherever he goes cos he has never been given a chance to show the supporters what he can do.

No, but he's shown the supporters of other clubs what he can do and that hasnt amounted to too much......

+1

[Ian Royal]

Two goals in eleven appearances is pretty poor at that level considering there are some clamouring for us to recall him.

Doesn't matter how bad he was, he would have been better than nothing when we were down to using Rasiak twice in a couple of days, on his own with no bench back up.

[leon]

Two goals in eleven appearances is pretty poor at that level considering there are some clamouring for us to recall him.

Doesn't matter how bad he was, he would have been better than nothing when we were down to using Rasiak twice in a couple of days, on his own with no bench back up.

LLoyd Owusu wasn't great but did a job up front, for a time

[Norfolk Royal]

Two goals in eleven appearances is pretty poor at that level considering there are some clamouring for us to recall him.

Doesn't matter how bad he was, he would have been better than nothing when we were down to using Rasiak twice in a couple of days, on his own with no bench back up.

LLoyd Owusu wasn't great but did a job up front, for a time

Yes, I remember that match when the ball accidentally hit him as well.

[leon]

LLoyd Owusu wasn't great but did a job up front, for a time

Yes, I remember that match when the ball accidentally hit him as well.

His lumbering around up front did at least distract the opposition defence for a bit.

[Ian Royal]

Two goals in eleven appearances is pretty poor at that level considering there are some clamouring for us to recall him.

Doesn't matter how bad he was, he would have been better than nothing when we were down to using Rasiak twice in a couple of days, on his own with no bench back up.

LLoyd Owusu wasn't great but did a job up front, for a time

Awful footballer for this level, but still scored a few goals for us and kept us ticking over as a side until we could bring in better.

[leon]

Doesn't matter how bad he was, he would have been better than nothing when we were down to using Rasiak twice in a couple of days, on his own with no bench back up.

LLoyd Owusu wasn't great but did a job up front, for a time

Awful footballer for this level, but still scored a few goals for us and kept us ticking over as a side until we could bring in better.

Exactly - the lumbering around helped us. And that goal against Ipswich. Needs must.

[Ian Royal]

I think we're agreeing, which is pretty unusual for HNA?