EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

5 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
3points
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2252
Joined: 27 Oct 2013 17:22

EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

by 3points » 25 Nov 2021 19:44

http://bit.ly/STAR-EFL-Decision

STAR’s analysis of the points deduction and what it all means for the club going forward

User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 17872
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

by Green » 25 Nov 2021 21:46

Was expecting something slightly more critical tbh.

How has it come to this? And are we really (in some small part) blaming the women's team?

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 14820
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

by Stranded » 26 Nov 2021 12:14

3points http://bit.ly/STAR-EFL-Decision

STAR’s analysis of the points deduction and what it all means for the club going forward


Interesting.

So if we sign Player from L1, we could pay a fee but also his wage wouldn't count to next season's wage budget if he has not played 3+ games at Champ Level? Or does he become a permitted player for next season as soon as he hits that milestone?

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7527
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

by Nameless » 28 Nov 2021 12:55

Green Was expecting something slightly more critical tbh.

How has it come to this? And are we really (in some small part) blaming the women's team?


No. It’s clear the reverse is the case. Our overspend is reduced by the amount that it costs to run the Women’s team. They are effectively neutral in this debate. Likewise the cost of running the Academy is off set against the headline loss.

User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 17872
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: EFL Agreed Decision - an assessment

by Green » 29 Nov 2021 21:27

Nameless
Green Was expecting something slightly more critical tbh.

How has it come to this? And are we really (in some small part) blaming the women's team?


No. It’s clear the reverse is the case. Our overspend is reduced by the amount that it costs to run the Women’s team. They are effectively neutral in this debate. Likewise the cost of running the Academy is off set against the headline loss.

It wasn't clear to me having read the link.

tbh still isn't, with a secondary glance over the article. "effectively neutral", why? And if it's not relevant to the overall P&L why mention it at all?


5 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

It is currently 30 Nov 2021 00:19