by PATRIQT » 12 Jun 2022 17:02
by South Coast Royal » 12 Jun 2022 17:02
Pepe the HorsemanSouth Coast Royal I guess Warnock would have had him at QPR and at Middlesboro and played him.
Regardless of any views on Warnock and his behaviour I would think that he is not a bad judge of a player so , on that basis, I wouldn't be against this move.
He didn't make his QPR debut until 2016. Warnock left in 2012.
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Jun 2022 17:43
by Snowflake Royal » 12 Jun 2022 19:21
AthleticoSpizz Worth a punt in the non-league circles?
Sam Johnson (FC Halfax), Danny Lewis (Brackley Town) and Ben Dudzinski (oxf*rd City) all got rave revues and awards last season.
It”s just a question….it might be my misconception but….if a keeper is a decent keeper…(his game is a limited participation) then he could be good at almost any level??
by Snowflake Royal » 12 Jun 2022 19:34
NathStPaulSnowflake Royal Much as I hate to agree with OMA after that, he has a point.
Three of Reading's four keepers last season were in the top ten keepers by number of saves made a game. Lumley was 53rd with less than 2 a game.
Boro conceded less than 10 shots a game to our 14+, we were at opposite ends of the table in that and other respects.
Put Lumley into last year's Reading side and the chances of him keeping anywhere near that many clean sheets are slim to say the least.
Certainly not reason to write him off, but he also won’t do just because Boro had a good defence and midfield protecting him
After what?
by NathStPaul » 12 Jun 2022 19:35
Snowflake RoyalNathStPaulSnowflake Royal Much as I hate to agree with OMA after that, he has a point.
Three of Reading's four keepers last season were in the top ten keepers by number of saves made a game. Lumley was 53rd with less than 2 a game.
Boro conceded less than 10 shots a game to our 14+, we were at opposite ends of the table in that and other respects.
Put Lumley into last year's Reading side and the chances of him keeping anywhere near that many clean sheets are slim to say the least.
Certainly not reason to write him off, but he also won’t do just because Boro had a good defence and midfield protecting him
After what?
For some reason, I read it as unnecessarily snarky. Reading it again, it isn’t. Maybe its because stranded is just so damn nice. Probably just me being stoopid
Anyhoo apologies.,
by Snowflake Royal » 12 Jun 2022 19:36
NathStPaulSnowflake RoyalNathStPaul After what?
For some reason, I read it as unnecessarily snarky. Reading it again, it isn’t. Maybe its because stranded is just so damn nice. Probably just me being stoopid
Anyhoo apologies.,
No not at all but due to my history of snarkiness it's understandable.
by Orion1871 » 12 Jun 2022 19:37
PATRIQT Rather we had Joanna Lumley in goal. He gives me the Simon Sheppard's!
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jun 2022 19:41
Snowflake RoyalNathStPaulSnowflake Royal For some reason, I read it as unnecessarily snarky. Reading it again, it isn’t. Maybe its because stranded is just so damn nice. Probably just me being stoopid
Anyhoo apologies.,
No not at all but due to my history of snarkiness it's understandable.
I may have been projecting. Also, it was what I was thinking but blunter.
by NathStPaul » 12 Jun 2022 19:43
Pepe the HorsemanSnowflake RoyalNathStPaul No not at all but due to my history of snarkiness it's understandable.
I may have been projecting. Also, it was what I was thinking but blunter.
So nice to see you guys getting along x
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Jun 2022 19:51
hell…has finally frozen overSnowflake RoyalNathStPaulSnowflake Royal Much as I hate to agree with OMA after that, he has a point.
Three of Reading's four keepers last season were in the top ten keepers by number of saves made a game. Lumley was 53rd with less than 2 a game.
Boro conceded less than 10 shots a game to our 14+, we were at opposite ends of the table in that and other respects.
Put Lumley into last year's Reading side and the chances of him keeping anywhere near that many clean sheets are slim to say the least.
Certainly not reason to write him off, but he also won’t do just because Boro had a good defence and midfield protecting him
After what?
For some reason, I read it as unnecessarily snarky. Reading it again, it isn’t. Maybe its because stranded is just so damn nice. Probably just me being stoopid
Anyhoo apologies.,
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jun 2022 20:17
NathStPaulPepe the HorsemanSnowflake Royal I may have been projecting. Also, it was what I was thinking but blunter.
So nice to see you guys getting along x
I'll always love you more x
Until you leave me. They always leave me....
by Hound » 12 Jun 2022 20:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Jun 2022 20:43
by Stranded » 12 Jun 2022 21:14
NathStPaulStranded Lumley kept 13 clean sheets last year. He'll do.
Because clean sheets are always down to the goalkeeper?
by NathStPaul » 12 Jun 2022 21:23
StrandedNathStPaulStranded Lumley kept 13 clean sheets last year. He'll do.
Because clean sheets are always down to the goalkeeper?
Of course not but shows he is part if a unit that can keep them regularly. He's nowhere near as bad as people want to make out he is.
We have a decent record at bringing in unheralded keepers and them doing alright.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 12 Jun 2022 21:41
by PATRIQT » 12 Jun 2022 23:25
YorkshireRoyal99 Lumley is ok.
by Snowflake Royal » 13 Jun 2022 08:13
AthleticoSpizzhell…has finally frozen overSnowflake RoyalNathStPaul After what?
For some reason, I read it as unnecessarily snarky. Reading it again, it isn’t. Maybe its because stranded is just so damn nice. Probably just me being stoopid
Anyhoo apologies.,
Ian, are you ok
by Snowflake Royal » 13 Jun 2022 08:17
YorkshireRoyal99 Lumley is ok, not outstanding, but got a good amount of experience at this level, although I admit he wouldn't look out of place (in a good way) in League One sides fighting for promotion. I'd rather him than Southwood, although he's not a major upgrade on him.
I don't think he will lose us more than points than he wins us, but I would back him to earn us more points than what either Southwood or Nyland would have done as well. I don't think he would be the difference to us staying up or going down, individually, either way.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 178 guests