by Son of Len » 18 Jan 2008 16:01
by cmonurz » 18 Jan 2008 16:01
Platypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 18 Jan 2008 16:01
Can't see how signing Samaras does anything in that department.Platypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
by Platypuss » 18 Jan 2008 16:05
The Surgeon of CrowthorneCan't see how signing Samaras does anything in that department.Platypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
by Vision » 18 Jan 2008 16:07
PlatypussThe Surgeon of CrowthorneCan't see how signing Samaras does anything in that department.Platypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
Samaras & McFadden >>>>>>>> DJ Campbell & Cameron Jerome
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 18 Jan 2008 16:20
by papereyes » 18 Jan 2008 16:21
The Surgeon of Crowthorne I can't believe anyone here would seriously want us to sign Samaras.
by Hoop Blah » 18 Jan 2008 16:23
VisionPlatypussThe Surgeon of CrowthorneCan't see how signing Samaras does anything in that department.Platypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
Samaras & McFadden >>>>>>>> DJ Campbell & Cameron Jerome
Honestly I'd take Jerome like a shot.
by PieEater » 18 Jan 2008 16:24
by Son of Len » 18 Jan 2008 16:38
PieEater An interesting view of the signings process on the OS.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/pa ... 36,00.html
I'd be happier if they had less time to write things like this than actually working to sign someone though.
by PieEater » 18 Jan 2008 17:11
by RoyalBlue » 18 Jan 2008 17:54
by Southbank Old Boy » 18 Jan 2008 17:54
Son of LenPieEater An interesting view of the signings process on the OS.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/pa ... 36,00.html
I'd be happier if they had less time to write things like this than actually working to sign someone though.
Writing these things up is what interns are for. The people who actually put the contracts together and ensure work papers, etc. are in order are having a pint right now.
by Son of Len » 18 Jan 2008 18:12
Southbank Old BoySon of LenPieEater An interesting view of the signings process on the OS.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/pa ... 36,00.html
I'd be happier if they had less time to write things like this than actually working to sign someone though.
Writing these things up is what interns are for. The people who actually put the contracts together and ensure work papers, etc. are in order are having a pint right now.
We don't have interns thank you very much!
by RoyalBlue » 18 Jan 2008 18:37
Southbank Old BoySon of LenPieEater An interesting view of the signings process on the OS.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/pa ... 36,00.html
I'd be happier if they had less time to write things like this than actually working to sign someone though.
Writing these things up is what interns are for. The people who actually put the contracts together and ensure work papers, etc. are in order are having a pint right now.
We don't have interns thank you very much!
by ankeny » 18 Jan 2008 19:02
Archie's penalty I think it's a bit stupid simply comparing the bottom sides in the thread. In doing this you miss the whole picture. Everyone in the premier league is having problems signing players. It's not just us. Who have Blackburn bought perchance? Villa?
Of course it's important to compare the bottom sides but the whole prem is rushing for players. As Coppell says it's a meat market. Isn't it best to shop quietly at the grocers until the dust settles?
by Royal Rother » 19 Jan 2008 20:01
IdealcmonurzPlatypuss Birmingham have a pretty good defensive record out of the teams at the bottom, but have a problem with scoring goals. They are obviously seeking to address the problem.
Spot on, and the point Surgeon of Crowthorne missed. Birmingham have identified a weakness, and solved it, or at least, attempted to.
Just like Fulham are doing.
Why is it that we are not even trying?
by PieEater » 20 Jan 2008 09:24
Ideal I'm happy we played better than we have for quite some time, but the fact is that man u were coasting, they didn't have to go all out, ....
by The whole year inn » 20 Jan 2008 09:33
by Royal Rother » 20 Jan 2008 13:15
Ideal I think it's quite ridiculous that everyone is all excited after losing 0-2.
Sure, we did play better than we have for a while.
However, you have to consider who we were playing. It's easy to get motivated for United. All the teams raise their game for them.
Cissé did look more of a footballer than he has before, and had a good game.
Yet this still does not solve but one of our major problem-areas, there's still the lack of a right winger and a defensive midfielder.
Hunt tried his best, but when played out of position did not have as good a game as he might have on the left. Do you really think Doyle belongs out wide in midfield?!?
Matejovsky had a good ten minutes on the pitch, but do you realisticly think he will run about like that for 90 minutes?
I'm happy we played better than we have for quite some time, but the fact is that man u were coasting, they didn't have to go all out, and playing Hunt out of position is weakening us and hindering his performance, we should get someone in so that we can play Hunt where he is best.
If you feel like this match "solved all our problems", then I have to say you don't have a clue.
Users browsing this forum: Chameleon, LightwaterRoyal, Mid Sussex Royal, morganb, Royal Ginger and 496 guests