How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

495 posts
urzmikep
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 16:37

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by urzmikep » 31 Jan 2008 23:41

Yet another transfer window slamming shut and activity at all the other Premiership clubs (especially those around us). Players having medicals all over the place and what about Reading, lights went out couple of hours ago once the Simon Cox deal was done! Hope this isn't a reflection of the lights going out on our time in the Premiership, just one exciting signing would have been nice, instead just anger at one of our young talents being shown the door!! Generally Academy players tend to show more passion than some of our current 1st teamers that aren't performing on the pitch(especially local lads that have been through the system and know what supporting your local teams all about).
I'll be there as normal on Saturday cheering the team on, but I personally think (& hope I'm wrong) that unless the 1st teamers start getting their act together Mr C and Mr M may have just blown our chances of remaining in the top flight, if so forget the ground expansion and Mr M's plans of selling the club (less attractive players in the Championship - look at Southampton!!)

:evil: :evil: :evil: :idea:

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 31 Jan 2008 23:44

Upper West?!?
But I would hazard a guess that Matejovsky will prove to be better than Sidwell. Therefore, we have improved. Maybe the results from this point onwards will start to have more resemblance to last seasons results.


:lol: Matejovsky has played 30 minutes in two matches. His market value doesn't say he's better than Sidwell.

Nobody paid £1.5 million for Sidwell.

The fact is he has looked promising. Whether he'll be better than Sidwell remains to be seem, but I'm very confident he's a big upgrade on anyone else we have in the middle.

:roll: The Kebe signing is a joke. French second division - be still my heart.
yeah, he must be shit. We should have signed a reserve player from a premier league team instead, as he'd much better.

the fact is until we see him play (or see him suspiciously never seem to play) we don't know how good he is. Loads said Doyle would be rubbish, and was a joke signing showing our lack of ambition.

Remember the gnashing of teeth 18 months ago when pundit after pundit tipped us to go down as we only had "championship standard players" in our squad, mainly because they'd never heard of them, and assumed anyone playing in the championship was rubbish? That's exactly the attitude shown by a huge number of posters this month, convinced that only players they know are any good.

Now it could turn out that Kebe is the next Bas Savage and our scouting network needs a large reminder that we aren't currently in the championship, but it would be nice to actually see him play before deciding that he is absolute shit.

After all, there's a thread on here about signings you got excited about, and it does kind of show that whether a signing leads you to spunk your boxers with excitement or leaves you filled with inertia often has little bearing on how the player turns out.

It isn't clear why Reading can't do the business in the transfer market, but they need to figure it out. If Reading is fortunate enough to stay up, they will have to improve in the summer. Coppell's Championship team needs a refresh.

I think they were over-loyal to Bryn in the summer as they wanted to give him a chance to step into Sidwell's shoes after doing so well as sub on many occasions (and he did - people shouldn't forget that).

I think our problem is scouting, as our scouts don't seem able to identify players who'll come in and make an impact. We shouldn't be spending £2.5 million of players who need to adapt, and if we'd been watching Halford, for example, for a year or two and couldn't tell he was woefully inadequate, then we need to employ better scouts. I mean, setanta covered a couple of Sunderland's pre-season games, and after that limited showing, Paul Parker was openly questioning what assets he had as a player other than "a long throw".

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Platypuss » 31 Jan 2008 23:52

Alves finally joins Boro.

Royal Spangle
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 31 Aug 2006 18:32

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Royal Spangle » 01 Feb 2008 00:21

I don't know why we should be suprised at the in-activity in the transfer market , typical RFC style ! Build us up with stories of the team needs strengthening and the scouting network has been busy for months and then ......... NOTHING
We needed a big name , someone to calm the nerves and lead us up the table , someone with prem experience ............. etc.
Boy am I fed up with RFC at the moment. It's a bit like comming down x-mas morning for your pressies and finding out that all you have got is SLIPPERS.... F*cking SLIPPERS.
I can't remember feeling so low about the club we love :cry: ( before you all start saying about the bad old days in div 3 etc ive been watching since 1985 so I have seen some dross :| )
:cry:

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Platypuss » 01 Feb 2008 00:31

Interesting to see the massive amount of loans in to prem teams from both other prem teams and also from overseas. It's something that appears to be becoming more and more prevalent, but we appear to not be in that kind of market. Does anyone know if it's something we have a policy against, or is there nothing really to be read into it?


Royal Spangle
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 31 Aug 2006 18:32

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Royal Spangle » 01 Feb 2008 00:37

SSC has said on record that he does not think that Prem clubs should be able to take players on loan.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Platypuss » 01 Feb 2008 00:41

Royal Spangle SSC has said on record that he does not think that Prem clubs should be able to take players on loan.


Yes, I seem to remember something like that - which Is why I mentioned a potential policy.

Hmm.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7369
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Alan Partridge » 01 Feb 2008 00:53

Royal Spangle SSC has said on record that he does not think that Prem clubs should be able to take players on loan.


Coppell doesn't like a rule...doesn't like the transfer window either..or the timing of the ANC...or the red card rule...or offisde rule

Makes no difference. These are ther rules and regulations. Make the most of them, everyone else does.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11953
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by RoyalBlue » 01 Feb 2008 08:20

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
:roll: The Kebe signing is a joke. French second division - be still my heart.
yeah, he must be shit. We should have signed a reserve player from a premier league team instead, as he'd much better.

the fact is until we see him play (or see him suspiciously never seem to play) we don't know how good he is. Loads said Doyle would be rubbish, and was a joke signing showing our lack of ambition.


But Kebe hardly comes with glowing references does he. A player who is prepared to go on strike to get what he wants, speaks little or no English, won't be up to speed at the top level in the French game let alone the English game and best of all he's carrying an injury and can't play at the moment. When we said we wanted a replacement for Little, we didn't mean in the sodding treatment room!

Big difference between him and Doyle is that IIRC Coppell saw Doyle play a few times before we signed him.


User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6708
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by PieEater » 01 Feb 2008 08:29

A bit of a LOL at Sunderland signing Andy Reid for £4m, that must rate Hunt at around £6m.

I'm a bit disappointed Bolton got Raziak in time for tomorrow.

User avatar
Blue and White Toucan
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: 11 Jul 2005 10:38
Location: Near to Ozymandias, boy he can drink !!!!!!

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Blue and White Toucan » 01 Feb 2008 08:30

TBH the 'other' teams have hardly had any major coups have they?? Boro excluded for Alves.

Fulham have signed has beens, Bolton have signed a good championship player but to replace Anelka!!, Sunderland have signed Reid from Charlton (Sorry but I do not think he would add to RFC), Wigan have also signed a few 'unkown' forces. Players like Defoe, Woodgate were never on our Radar.

Does make me laugh at all the people on this board that think 'if I was in charge, then I would sign XXXX and XXXX and XXXXX' as if its that easy. Looking around there was little to go for and the only one that we might have missed was Taylor from Pompey (But we don't even know if we tried before we have a go)

Northern Git
Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:45

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Northern Git » 01 Feb 2008 08:57

Blue and White Toucan TBH the 'other' teams have hardly had any major coups have they?? Boro excluded for Alves.

Fulham have signed has beens, Bolton have signed a good championship player but to replace Anelka!!, Sunderland have signed Reid from Charlton (Sorry but I do not think he would add to RFC), Wigan have also signed a few 'unkown' forces. Players like Defoe, Woodgate were never on our Radar.

Does make me laugh at all the people on this board that think 'if I was in charge, then I would sign XXXX and XXXX and XXXXX' as if its that easy. Looking around there was little to go for and the only one that we might have missed was Taylor from Pompey (But we don't even know if we tried before we have a go)


We did (a journo acquaintance of mine does some RFC reporting) and thought we had him. T&C's were the problem.

Dai Brainbocs
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2460
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:20
Location: Reading

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Dai Brainbocs » 01 Feb 2008 10:25

I can't see the point in signing the likes of Litmanen, it's like Sunderland signing Andy Cole.

To broaden it slightly - and it's been longer coming than I expected - sooner or later football is going to hit the buffers in a very big way. When that happens, clubs which haven't lashed out stupid money will be the ones best able to cope in the brave new world.

People will look at a cost of their tickets, chairmen spending absurd sums of money on players they have literally never heard of who they know will leg it at the first opportunity for a few quid more, and join these things up and simply say they aren't going to put up with it any more, and just watch it on TV. But hang on a minute, what you see on TV has become so predictable that people start to switch off there at the same time. Big blocks of empty seats start becoming visible at all but a handful of grounds. Clubs further prostitute themselves to TV and start coralling the dwindling paying public into areas of the ground away from the side the cameras are on to give an impression of more atmosphere and excitement than is really there. Further pees off the paying public, which dwindles further. TV companies slash the payouts in the next contract, clubs are still committed to paying a million a year to players who can't even make the bench Etc etc

In this scenario, there will be clubs for which the penny drops first and I just wonder if Reading might be slightly ahead of the game.


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20744
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Stranded » 01 Feb 2008 10:59

RoyalBlue
Rev Algenon Stickleback H
:roll: The Kebe signing is a joke. French second division - be still my heart.
yeah, he must be shit. We should have signed a reserve player from a premier league team instead, as he'd much better.

the fact is until we see him play (or see him suspiciously never seem to play) we don't know how good he is. Loads said Doyle would be rubbish, and was a joke signing showing our lack of ambition.


But Kebe hardly comes with glowing references does he. A player who is prepared to go on strike to get what he wants, speaks little or no English, won't be up to speed at the top level in the French game let alone the English game and best of all he's carrying an injury and can't play at the moment. When we said we wanted a replacement for Little, we didn't mean in the sodding treatment room!

Big difference between him and Doyle is that IIRC Coppell saw Doyle play a few times before we signed him.


I thought it had been clarified that Kebe was actually injured with the hamstring strain he currently has rather than being on strike.

Dai Brainbocs
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2460
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:20
Location: Reading

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Dai Brainbocs » 01 Feb 2008 11:03

Ideal Unfortunately we can not rely on economic fatalism to get us the results we need to avoid relegation.
The other clubs just aren't going to go bankrupt fast enough for that to happen. If that is the straw you are clutching at, then you are in trouble!


I'm looking further ahead than the end of this season. The rumours about the ground expansion not going ahead fit in wth this. On the on hand it might sound a bit doom-laden, but it might just be pragmatism.

rotherwick_royal
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 21 Sep 2006 15:08
Location: In a field in Hampshire

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by rotherwick_royal » 01 Feb 2008 11:11

PieEater A bit of a LOL at Sunderland signing Andy Reid for £4m, that must rate Hunt at around £6m.

I'm a bit disappointed Bolton got Raziak in time for tomorrow.


Do you think he will play?

If he had signed for us he might have got to warm the bench sometime in April!

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Hoop Blah » 01 Feb 2008 11:32

Stranded I thought it had been clarified that Kebe was actually injured with the hamstring strain he currently has rather than being on strike.


Not wanting to doubt the club or anything, but it sounds a bit too convenient to me.

On the other hand the media might have sensationalised Kebe's comments at the time to make the strike story a bit more than it was.

I think there was more to it than just a tight hammy.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20744
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Stranded » 01 Feb 2008 11:36

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Probably had a slight niggle and asked not to play as it may have put the move in doubt.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22274
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Royal Rother » 01 Feb 2008 11:49

Dai Brainbocs I can't see the point in signing the likes of Litmanen, it's like Sunderland signing Andy Cole.

To broaden it slightly - and it's been longer coming than I expected - sooner or later football is going to hit the buffers in a very big way. When that happens, clubs which haven't lashed out stupid money will be the ones best able to cope in the brave new world.

People will look at a cost of their tickets, chairmen spending absurd sums of money on players they have literally never heard of who they know will leg it at the first opportunity for a few quid more, and join these things up and simply say they aren't going to put up with it any more, and just watch it on TV. But hang on a minute, what you see on TV has become so predictable that people start to switch off there at the same time. Big blocks of empty seats start becoming visible at all but a handful of grounds. Clubs further prostitute themselves to TV and start coralling the dwindling paying public into areas of the ground away from the side the cameras are on to give an impression of more atmosphere and excitement than is really there. Further pees off the paying public, which dwindles further. TV companies slash the payouts in the next contract, clubs are still committed to paying a million a year to players who can't even make the bench Etc etc

In this scenario, there will be clubs for which the penny drops first and I just wonder if Reading might be slightly ahead of the game.


Hooray!! This is almost word for word what I've been saying for the last year or 2.

Therefore it's a brilliant post!! :wink:

Good to see you back on the board BTW.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: How we stack up against the opposition in terms of signings

by Hoop Blah » 01 Feb 2008 12:03

Royal Rother
Dai Brainbocs I can't see the point in signing the likes of Litmanen, it's like Sunderland signing Andy Cole.

To broaden it slightly - and it's been longer coming than I expected - sooner or later football is going to hit the buffers in a very big way. When that happens, clubs which haven't lashed out stupid money will be the ones best able to cope in the brave new world.

People will look at a cost of their tickets, chairmen spending absurd sums of money on players they have literally never heard of who they know will leg it at the first opportunity for a few quid more, and join these things up and simply say they aren't going to put up with it any more, and just watch it on TV. But hang on a minute, what you see on TV has become so predictable that people start to switch off there at the same time. Big blocks of empty seats start becoming visible at all but a handful of grounds. Clubs further prostitute themselves to TV and start coralling the dwindling paying public into areas of the ground away from the side the cameras are on to give an impression of more atmosphere and excitement than is really there. Further pees off the paying public, which dwindles further. TV companies slash the payouts in the next contract, clubs are still committed to paying a million a year to players who can't even make the bench Etc etc

In this scenario, there will be clubs for which the penny drops first and I just wonder if Reading might be slightly ahead of the game.


Hooray!! This is almost word for word what I've been saying for the last year or 2.

Therefore it's a brilliant post!! :wink:

Good to see you back on the board BTW.


I agree it will implode at some point, at least outside of the global tourist attractions like Old Trafford, but it would be good if we can position RFC to be in touching distance of the top 10 when it does as opposed to alongside the likes of Norwich, Watford and Charlton is the second tier.

Is that possible though? I hope so!

495 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 297 guests

It is currently 20 Jul 2025 06:48