by Ian Royal » 25 Sep 2011 21:36
by Kitson12 » 25 Sep 2011 23:17
handbags_harris I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
by Royal With Cheese » 25 Sep 2011 23:56
handbags_harris I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
by BenReadingFC » 26 Sep 2011 00:14
handbags_harris I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
by Ian Royal » 26 Sep 2011 00:21
by BenReadingFC » 26 Sep 2011 00:39
by RoyalBlue » 26 Sep 2011 08:07
Royal With Cheese ]handbags_harris I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
ISort of agree, although he did blast it - I thought Fed's just didn't get the chance to react quick enough. Hell of a tight angle.
by RobRoyal » 26 Sep 2011 09:53
by Z175 » 26 Sep 2011 09:55
by leon » 26 Sep 2011 10:41
Z175 I would agree that normally the keeper should not be beaten at his near post. But this is because its freakishly difficult to kick it right in the corner from a tight angle, so normally the keeper has a chance.
However on the occasions where this is done it is impossible to save. Watch the replay, Federici has it covered, sees it, reacts early, jumps and doesn't get it. A fraction left, right, up or down and its a miss or a save, class finish and nothing to be done.
Another good example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf-od48IfkI
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Sep 2011 11:13
Z175 I would agree that normally the keeper should not be beaten at his near post. But this is because its freakishly difficult to kick it right in the corner from a tight angle, so normally the keeper has a chance.
However on the occasions where this is done it is impossible to save. Watch the replay, Federici has it covered, sees it, reacts early, jumps and doesn't get it. A fraction left, right, up or down and its a miss or a save, class finish and nothing to be done.
Another good example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf-od48IfkI
by Maguire » 26 Sep 2011 12:06
by bloody Volvo driver » 26 Sep 2011 12:21
by bcubed » 26 Sep 2011 13:35
BenReadingFChandbags_harris I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
I've watched it in slowmo and I don't think Feds could have done too much about it. He tried hard but the pace of the ball beat him.
It was a brilliant shot right in the near post top corner that carried on rising into the roof of the net at speed. OK he got beat at the near post... but that was an almightily acurate shot to get beaten by.
I can't really faulter Feds positioning either.
Give McSheffrey a clap and move on.
by Percy's Rocket » 26 Sep 2011 21:46
by floyd__streete » 26 Sep 2011 21:55
by Ian Royal » 26 Sep 2011 22:47
floyd__streete Just watched http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15054276.stm . Federici hardly covers himself in glory with the Cov goal, but witness - AGAIN - how flat-footed Pearce is in lolloping behind McSheffrey meaning that no pressure is put on the man having a pop on goal. Fed also threatens to cost us another goal around the 50 second mark of that clip, managing to palm another shot from a tight angle back into the middle of the 18 yard box, only for Cov to blast over - as usual he makes the straight-forward look difficult. Reading's goal calmly finished by Church.....yes, Church . Gorkss beaten all ends up for the pen.
by Compo's Hat » 26 Sep 2011 23:35
by PieEater » 27 Sep 2011 12:13
by M-U-R-T-Y » 27 Sep 2011 12:53
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 332 guests