by riverroyal » 13 Jul 2006 10:51
by urzzz » 13 Jul 2006 10:52
by Royalee » 13 Jul 2006 10:54
by shadesrwrf » 13 Jul 2006 11:05
riverroyal The football league (what we used to be in) have published their report on agents fees. Turns out Reading spent £345,000 on agents fees, the seventh highest in the Championship. Leeds spent the most, £604,000.
http://www.football-league.premiumtv.co ... 846,00.pdf
by RIP ELM Park » 13 Jul 2006 11:13
by shadesrwrf » 13 Jul 2006 11:17
RIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
by Wycombe Royal » 13 Jul 2006 11:17
RIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
by Forbury Lion » 13 Jul 2006 11:59
Yes, but most players are greedy b*stards and would soon dump their agents/drive down the costs if they thought they could save a few quid.shadesrwrfRIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
The players'd just charge more to cover such costs wouldn't they.
by Dirk Gently » 13 Jul 2006 12:32
RIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
by biscuitman » 13 Jul 2006 13:01
by urz_1871 » 13 Jul 2006 13:19
by RoyalBlue » 13 Jul 2006 13:23
Wycombe RoyalRIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
Maybe so, but if we don't pay the agent the player will just get a bigger signing on fee. The same amount of money will still be paid out or you will miss out on the players you want.
by Top Flight » 13 Jul 2006 13:29
by Wycombe Royal » 13 Jul 2006 13:39
RoyalBlue Not all players are as bright, sensible and articulate as the likes of Lovell, Forster and Kitson.
by SpaceCruiser » 13 Jul 2006 13:40
Top Flight Agents are a part of football, they will always be a part of football and they should be respected.
by RoyalBlue » 13 Jul 2006 13:47
Wycombe RoyalRoyalBlue Not all players are as bright, sensible and articulate as the likes of Lovell, Forster and Kitson.
Wasn't Eric Hall Forster's agent?
by From Despair To Where? » 13 Jul 2006 21:27
by RG30 » 13 Jul 2006 21:30
by The whole year inn » 14 Jul 2006 01:22
by Hoop Blah » 14 Jul 2006 08:59
RIP ELM Park Still too much. Agents represent the players, so the players should pay their fees.
SpaceCruiserTop Flight Agents are a part of football, they will always be a part of football and they should be respected.
Not when they only just represent the player's interests, done zero work for the club and yet demand too much money from the club.
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Bing [Bot] and 391 guests