![]()
|  
       20 December 2003: LEAGUE DIVISION ONE 
      READING 0 CRYSTAL PALACE 3 
       | 
  |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  
       goals 
     | 
    Reading: - Crystal Palace: Johnson (40 mins, 90 mins), Routledge (43 mins).  | 
      Half Time: 0-2 Attendance: 12,743 
  | 
  |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  
       teams 
     | 
     Reading: Hahnemann, Shorey, 
      Brown, Mackie (Murray 63), Ingimarsson, Salako (Morgan 75), Sidwell, Hughes, 
      Watson, Savage, Forster. Subs not used: Harper, Newman, Young. Crystal Palace: Myhre, Butterfield, Popovic, Edwards, Borrowdale, Hughes (Derry 88), Riihilahti, Gray, Routledge, Shipperley, Johnson. Subs not used: Fleming, Freedman, Berthelin, Black.  | 
  ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  
       bookings 
     | 
     Reading: - Crystal Palace: - Referee: B Curson (Leicester)  | 
  ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  
       report 
     | 
     
       Reading were on the wrong end of another 0-3 score-line this afternoon - this time being well beaten at home by a side near the foot of the table. Crystal Palace were, on this afternoon's performance, a much better side than the Royals. Palace created by far the better chances throughout the whole game and always looked more likely to find the net. The 0-3 defeat fairly reflected Reading's contribution to the game. Reading never looked likely to score and had just one shot in the entire second half when Salako put in a tame effort straight at the keeper. The Royals looked static, slow and predictable with the visitors working the ball around far better to get into dangerous positions. Palace should have gone ahead earlier after putting a shot against the foot of the post but went ahead five minutes before the break when a good move saw the impressive Johnson do well in the area to control the ball and put it under Hahnemann. Shortly afterwards it was 0-2 when Savage lost the ball in the Palace half and a quick break saw the ball crossed behind the Reading defence and stuck home from close range. The same pattern continued after the break with the visitors always looking more likely to extend their lead - Hahnemann made a couple of saves and they put a few wide of the target. Dean Morgan made his Reading debut coming off the bench and looked lively getting in a rare Reading shot. It was the slightest glimmer of hope though and Palace sealed an impressive win in the dying seconds - making it 0-3 after the ball was played forward on another quick attack. Reading were very much second best.  | 
  ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  
       FANS' POST MATCH OPINION  
     | 
  
|  
       What 
        a great day it promised, last game before Christmas, lads piss up all 
        day, live on Sky, sort of local derby, chance to get over last weeks blip 
        at Stoke and what happens! That game and performance was surely right 
        up there with the biggest load of crap ever to grace the Madejski. What 
        an embarrassment. How many who were there freezing their wotsits off, 
        thought what the bloody hell am I doing here watching this load bollocks 
        when I could be somewhere nice and warm with a beverage in my hand watching 
        it on telly. Highlight of the game was Vinny our mate managing to eat 
        three pies in the first half! They even shut the supporters bar at half 
        time so we couldn't warm up and had the pleasure of inhaling a thick fog 
        of disgusting smoke under the east stand concourse.  I 
        question Coppell's passion for the Reading job. Before the game he spend 
        more time talking about his love for Palace than about how he was approaching 
        the game from a Reading point of view. I have supported Reading for over 
        25 years and although have lived in Brighton since the early 80's, l have 
        a season ticket and hardly miss a game at home. I know lots of Brighton 
        season ticket supporters and heard from a numbers of sources that Coppell 
        was not interested in Reading and wanted to stay at Brighton. The only 
        reason he left was that Brighton's Chairman Dick Night was desperate for 
        the compensation money to ease their financial crisis. We often talk about 
        football players getting huge sums of money and not putting the effort 
        in. Well why do we think it should be any different for managers? We had 
        a fantastic start to the season, we have some great players (they were 
        working for Pardew), and there is no reason why we should not at least 
        get to the pay-offs. We the fans and our fantastic Chairman care deeply 
        for our club, but what about our Manager - is he a Reading man?  Dear 
        God, what has happened to the encouraging form of the Wigan & Chelsea 
        games?? Two matches in a row Reading have been outplayed by teams struggling 
        near the foot of the table. This was extremely poor stuff indeed & I can't 
        be bothered to say much else because I'd only be banging on about the 
        same things that are concerns. I just hope the management will actually 
        do a bit more than tinker with personnel & make some major changes to 
        formation, system & the attitude of some of the so-called-professionals 
        who ponsed around out there today to no avail before we slide too far. 
         Bas 
        Savage was Reading's man of the match - not that that means he had a good 
        game - he just had less of a nightmare than everyone else. It's games 
        like this that underline my reasoning for thinking Kevin Watson should 
        be on the transfer list - he had a truly awful game. He is slow and predictable. 
        Bring in someone like Ricardo Fuller up front, Marc Bircham from QPR and 
        a fast capable centre back. What was Brown doing at right back?! We must 
        be able to play two up front at home (I know injuries aren't helping us) 
        because the 4-5-1 has been sussed by visiting managers - we don't have 
        good enough defenders at the moment to cope with visiting sides putting 
        pressure on us - last year the 4-5-1 was most effective at home when Upson 
        was in the side. Coppell WILL get it right, let's just hope it's soon. 
         I'm 
        sure yesterday was sunday. At least I assume it was going by the fact 
        that there was a pub side playing at the Mad Stad against Palace. Most 
        pubs would probably have been embarassed to be represented by that lot 
        though. For once I wouldn't have got annoyed if someone leaving early 
        had blocked my view, I only wish someone had stood in front of me for 
        the 90 mins. I don't understand why we are sticking to the same predictable 
        4-5-1 punt it up to Forster tactics when it is clearly not working. Playing 
        that style we won a lot last year but we also lost a lot and now teams 
        know what to expect we are just getting more of the losses. If we are 
        going to play Savage then he must start up front not on the wing in a 
        4-4-2 with Forster so that oppositions actually have to think about what's 
        going on for a change. Wingers should have pace and be able to cross and 
        Savage has neither of those. When he's in the middle though he does cause 
        problems. With a midfield like the one yesterday we create so few chances 
        and if Forster has an off day like he did against Palace we are as likely 
        to score as the US are to find WMD in Iraq. We need to Mr Mad to dig deep 
        again to add some real quality to the squad cos we won't go up with this 
        lot.  I 
        wasn't at the Mad Stad on Saturday but watched the whole horror show on 
        TV. One thing struck me, how immature some of the players appear. For 
        those of us who went to Crewe a while back we were entertained at half 
        time by some youngsters playing a match in which there was no real passing, 
        each of them seemed to want to beat everybody and score and they all followed 
        the ball round the pitch like iron filings follow a magnet. It seemed 
        to me that some of our players were doing the same, in the build-up to 
        the second goal how many defenders formed up to oppose the player with 
        the ball instead of marking the eventual scorer? Is it that they don't 
        trust each other to do a good job or do they just not know who's supposed 
        to do what? Surely the game does not just revolve around getting the ball 
        but also ivolves marking the opposition (they are trying to score as well!) 
        and, when we do have the ball it's moving to give the man in posession 
        more options. These fundamentals seemed to be sadly lacking on Saturday 
        together with an obvious lack of passion and agression when compared to 
        the opposition players. Just like at Stoke we cannot handle a team that 
        harrasses us. Come on SC shake 'em up let's have some commitment and passion 
        and make this team one we can be proud of again!   | 
  
|  
       Got an opinion? E-Mail us at opinion@royals.org 
    Appropriate submissions will appear on match report pages  | 
  
 
  
  Copyright Hob Nob Anyone? © 1994-2003 
  The Original 
  Reading Football Club Internet Site