Friday's LegacySvlad Cjelli I think it's easier for BMc to keep it as it is - dropping Feds would be a real slap in the face for him, so keeping the younger, less-experienced McCarthy as second choice is easier in terms of man-management.
does this suggest brian mcdermott doesn't have broad enough shoulders, or a strong enough backbone?
federici was injured and mccarthy stepped in. he impressed, looked a lot more commanding of his area and collecting crosses and with the exception of one or two shakey moments, as any keeper has most weeks, he was outstanding! federici returns to fitness and is still on the bench, he gets a little grumpy and for no fault of his own mccarthy is dropped and federici reinstated as number one.
now it's easy to hide behind the fact that one keeper was more experienced than the other, and we were heading into a challenging part of the season (federici was awful in the final fwiw), but for me it was clear that federici didn't like being kept out of the side, made it known and was put back in the side swiftly to prevent having an unhappy keeper wanting out in the summer.
It's a marginal call either way. As such you can completely understand McDermott going with the experienced well paid "star" over the up and coming youngster. It's less likely to cause disent in the ranks afterall. I happen to think it's the wrong call (as I thought persisting with Long was this time last year) it may or may not pay off. And we'll never know whether making a different choice would have paid off better.