Remember the trip to Champions Bradford for the 5-2 winMr Angry wrote:First clean sheet for eons as well, and against the "champions elect"........
Sadly (fortunately ) a week before the fire so we have form (of sorts)
by Franchise FC » 15 Apr 2023 19:27
Remember the trip to Champions Bradford for the 5-2 winMr Angry wrote:First clean sheet for eons as well, and against the "champions elect"........
by Royal_jimmy » 15 Apr 2023 19:30
by Franchise FC » 15 Apr 2023 19:32
by AthleticoSpizz » 15 Apr 2023 19:33
well it’s ‘progress’ we held a clean sheet lolRoyal_jimmy wrote:To think we didn't even have a shot on target yet we celebrated like we won the game at the end
by Blackbag » 15 Apr 2023 19:39
by Royal_jimmy » 15 Apr 2023 19:42
Let's hold our horses and see how we get on in the final 4 matchesBlackbag wrote:Loved listening to his interview after, is it to early to say give him the job permanently? What have we got to lose ( I did originally want Mick McCarthy)
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Apr 2023 19:49
It is too early. But It's a very good first step.Blackbag wrote:Loved listening to his interview after, is it to early to say give him the job permanently? What have we got to lose ( I did originally want Mick McCarthy)
by Hound » 15 Apr 2023 19:49
Mick McCarthy?? He makes Ince sound upbeat and positiveBlackbag wrote:Loved listening to his interview after, is it to early to say give him the job permanently? What have we got to lose ( I did originally want Mick McCarthy)
by MR.CYNICAL » 15 Apr 2023 19:52
Not sure what you mean, you only pay if you use the busAscotexgunner wrote:Grrr since when have park and ride from Mereoak started charging for your car separately. Cheeky f*ckers.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 15 Apr 2023 19:53
Comment made pre game as a positive when I saw the Burnley team sheet, no way taking away anything from the performance.Sutekh wrote:And don’t you know it, the number of fans coming out and putting a downer on everything by saying it was only the Claret’s second stringMid Sussex Royal wrote:Some unfamiliar names for Burnley today, including the keeper. Also no Zaroury.you just can’t make some people happy!
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Apr 2023 19:58
He has at least proven he can manage well over the years tho.Hound wrote:Mick McCarthy?? He makes Ince sound upbeat and positiveBlackbag wrote:Loved listening to his interview after, is it to early to say give him the job permanently? What have we got to lose ( I did originally want Mick McCarthy)
by Millsy » 15 Apr 2023 20:18
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Apr 2023 20:25
It was more organised, self-confident and proactive.Millsy wrote:Can anyone who had the guts to watch all of it tell me what, if anything other than luck, was different about this defence?
Is it that we had a more packed midfield and were using attack as our form of defence? Same personnel. What changed?
by Jackson Corner » 15 Apr 2023 20:28
They made six changes not there strongest line up. Which will set Warnock off on one.windermereROYAL wrote:How do you know?Royal_jimmy wrote: Burnley weren't fully on it today .
by Ascotexgunner » 15 Apr 2023 20:29
Not today I wasnt. Charged 5.60 for the park and ride and 1.00 for parking. Driver gave me 2 receipts. Everyone was.MR.CYNICAL wrote:Not sure what you mean, you only pay if you use the busAscotexgunner wrote:Grrr since when have park and ride from Mereoak started charging for your car separately. Cheeky f*ckers.
by Ascotexgunner » 15 Apr 2023 20:37
We didn't have 3 centrebacks getting in each others way as well.....this was Sarrs best game I've seen.Snowflake Royal wrote:It was more organised, self-confident and proactive.Millsy wrote:Can anyone who had the guts to watch all of it tell me what, if anything other than luck, was different about this defence?
Is it that we had a more packed midfield and were using attack as our form of defence? Same personnel. What changed?
It was shielded from midfield better and had an outlet with Azeez and Kelvin E.
Knobbling their very good left winger early on and then the right one late on helped a lot.
Oh and we pressed much much higher from the front. Mostly as a unit. And because we had some pace that didnt hurt us as much as it would have with three slow CBs and high WBs.
by Millsy » 15 Apr 2023 21:49
Really helpful thanks Ian.Snowflake Royal wrote:It was more organised, self-confident and proactive.Millsy wrote:Can anyone who had the guts to watch all of it tell me what, if anything other than luck, was different about this defence?
Is it that we had a more packed midfield and were using attack as our form of defence? Same personnel. What changed?
It was shielded from midfield better and had an outlet with Azeez and Kelvin E.
Knobbling their very good left winger early on and then the right one late on helped a lot.
Oh and we pressed much much higher from the front. Mostly as a unit. And because we had some pace that didnt hurt us as much as it would have with three slow CBs and high WBs.
by Ark Royal » 15 Apr 2023 22:35
Yes, that was Sarr's best game for us.Hound wrote:Yeah thought Sarr was decent today
by Royal_jimmy » 15 Apr 2023 22:37
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Royals and Racers, stealthpapes and 787 guests