by RoyalBlue »
19 May 2008 13:31
Bowman's Quiver andrew1957 brendywendy really dont get the delay
how/why has an announcement due for the end of last week, been postponed indefinately, and nothing been said by the club
what are the reason for this?
this was my original point before royallee got all mental on me
The delay in announcing what is going on gets more bizarre by the day.
I think we can be fairly sure that he is staying as there would be little point is delaying an announcement that he is off BUT what can be delaying the announcement that he is staying is hard to fathom.
Oddly, I take the opposite view. The longer this drags on the more I'm inclined to think that he's decided his heart's not really in it but wanted the weekend to sleep on it.
One way or the other the club need to clarify matters so we can all move on.
I'm with you on that one. I reckon he told them at the end of last week that, touched as he was by the show of strong support from both the Directors and fans, he felt it was best for him and the club that they went their separate ways. JM and NH then asked him to think it over one more time and come back to them after the weekend.
Whilst I would like him to stay, if he hasn't yet been able to come to a fully committed decision, I think he should go.
We need to move on now in a positive manner whether that be with or without Steve Coppell. Continued uncertainty does no one any good.
andrew1957 TBM Sarah Star I keep wondering if the delay is because he really doesn't want to stay and is delaying it until the fuss has died down so he can break it to us gently.
No i think he is staying but they are discussing his wages - they wanna half it, i doubt he'll wanna accept that!
I really hope you are wrong - would be very sad if he leaves over money.
It would seem fair to me that he did only receive 50% of PL pay as he must take some of the blame for last season and £600K or so a year for a Championship manger would seem more than fair to me.
Hang on a minute, if his last contract had been drafted properly it should already have covered what would happen in the event of relegation, including salary payable.
If that is in his contract and the Chairman is now trying to renegotiate/get away from the provisions in the contract then that does sound pretty familiar! If it is the case then why the hell should SC move away from what had already been agreed would happen in the event of relegation?!
Will we end up being told the money was available to cover SC's salary whilst the club forget to mention that it only covered half his salary expectations?!