RG30 Doesn't matter how many stats Snowball can bore us with, fact of the matter was Long was excellent on Saturday and would have been MOTM had it not been for Federici's match winning saves
He was OMotM
by Snowball » 21 Dec 2010 21:47
RG30 Doesn't matter how many stats Snowball can bore us with, fact of the matter was Long was excellent on Saturday and would have been MOTM had it not been for Federici's match winning saves
by sandman » 21 Dec 2010 21:54
Snowball He was OMotM
by pea » 21 Dec 2010 22:17
SnowballRG30 Doesn't matter how many stats Snowball can bore us with, fact of the matter was Long was excellent on Saturday and would have been MOTM had it not been for Federici's match winning saves
He was OMotM
by Arch » 26 Dec 2010 17:06
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 26 Dec 2010 17:24
by Royal Rother » 26 Dec 2010 17:25
by brendywendy » 26 Dec 2010 17:28
by loyalroyaldaz » 26 Dec 2010 17:40
by cmonurz » 26 Dec 2010 17:57
by Gordons Cumming » 26 Dec 2010 18:30
by floyd__streete » 26 Dec 2010 18:35
by Snowball » 26 Dec 2010 18:39
Harpers So Solid Crew has the change been 4-4-2?
by Snowball » 26 Dec 2010 18:40
floyd__streete Us Long bashes have egg all over our faces this last couple of weeks, and fair play because that was a sensational performance today. Trouble is, we have seen this before from Shane; a burst of goalscoring and barnstorming performances, only to revert back to months upon end of shot-shy mediocrity. The trick now is to keep this up.....
by floyd__streete » 26 Dec 2010 18:44
Snowball If he gets 20 this season we'll lose him
by Snowball » 26 Dec 2010 19:06
by Big Foot » 26 Dec 2010 19:21
by Snowball » 26 Dec 2010 19:31
Big Foot If you think about how players such as Mackie, Sinclair and Morison have been getting rave reviews this season then it shows how good Longy is
by readingbedding » 26 Dec 2010 19:38
T.R.O.L.I. Would have added this to the original thread but it appears to have been locked.
Another game, another two points spaffed away due to Long's inability to hit the target. His workrate up to the 18 yard line is unquestionable and often is performing a thankless task, however he is first a foremost a striker and a striker's ultimate role is to score goals.
It appears the cliched nickname of "Jigsaw" is currently the most accurate summation of his efforts this season in front of goal - 4 goals in 19 league games is atrocious (especially when 3 of those goals were from the penalty spot) for the "number one striker" at any football club.
No doubt Snowball will be all over this thread like a rash stating how Long is actually not going through a bad patch and that he's actually in good form, but the biggest thing for me is the number of points we have failed to pick up recently due to Long's poor finishing. He's missed glorious chances against Cardiff, Norwich, Watford and now Coventry and, as 2-0 alludes to on another thread, it looks more and more like we are going to have to settle for a season of mid table mediocrity.
Time for a change? Well, I certainly think so and I'd venture I'm not in the minority. Whether Brian McDermott agrees remains to be seen but I'm sure there's many a Reading fan that is hoping that Santa brings them an early Christmas present - that being Shane Long being dropped to the bench at Pride Park next Saturday.
by brendywendy » 26 Dec 2010 19:52
by Svlad Cjelli » 26 Dec 2010 20:00
Svlad Cjelli Yep, he [BMc] has been playing a game of poker, balancing Shane Long's confidence against the teams results. If it comes good he wins on both counts, because he's then got a confident striker who's scoring goals AND a winning team.
But at the moment he seems more like a losing gambler who feels they can't afford to give up throwing good money after bad - he's invested so much in Shane Long's confidence that to drop him now would be much, much worse than dropping him 2, 5 or 10 games ago would have been, so he has to persevere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 144 guests