Opposition fans back from the game - 24/25 page 225 onwards

4769 posts
User avatar
brighton_royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3220
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 12:34
Location: 60lb chain.

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by brighton_royal » 12 Mar 2014 14:00

HoneyRoastHoax I was in the 1901 club for the Brighton game (prawn sandwich)

Was really funny to see how some people are completely blind to anything other then whats good for their team. The pull back on Alf in the 1st half was :shock:

Stone wall foul, my mate who doesn't support either team was there and was laughing too at the reaction of the brighton fans calling Alf a cheat and saying he dived.

Logic doesn't really work in football supporting does it.


Me too HRHers. East Stand. I was v pissed when Drenthe scored and made a bit of a scene.

If you still hate Futcher
Member
Posts: 623
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 16:46
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by If you still hate Futcher » 12 Mar 2014 16:31

Warfield North Stand To avoid any further confusion over the meaning of the word tin pot, let's all agree that Reading are the most tin pot two bit outfit it is possible to be.

They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one. Their home support is quiet, they like clacker sticks and drums, they brought a laughable 1,000 here last weekend, and no-one considers them a proper rival except a tiny non league team.

Two bob clowns. Any accusations of tinpotness towards anyone should be measured against "Reading Soccer Club".

Latest offering from NSC. Considering they have a go at themselves about having clacker sticks earlier in the thread..... :oops:


ROFLattLOLed?

You could read a certain amount of envy into that (although he is correct about the home support being quiet)

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by sandman » 12 Mar 2014 16:39

The irony of course being that the way we have built the club and the successes that have come with it over the last two decades means we are most likely one of the clubs whose template their owners will be following.

Anyhow, it's time to leave them to it.

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by Man Friday » 12 Mar 2014 17:22

Warfield North Stand They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one.

Who doesn't? (One or two clubs like Man City aside.)

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by Ian Royal » 12 Mar 2014 18:12

Warfield North Stand To avoid any further confusion over the meaning of the word tin pot, let's all agree that Reading are the most tin pot two bit outfit it is possible to be.

They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one. Their home support is quiet, they like clacker sticks and drums, they brought a laughable 1,000 here last weekend, and no-one considers them a proper rival except a tiny non league team.

Two bob clowns. Any accusations of tinpotness towards anyone should be measured against "Reading Soccer Club".

Latest offering from NSC. Considering they have a go at themselves about having clacker sticks earlier in the thread..... :oops:

Wasn't our attendance that first season just shy of 11k on average? And wasn't that several thousand higher than the previous season?


User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2913
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by tmesis » 12 Mar 2014 18:36

Man Friday
Warfield North Stand They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one.

Who doesn't? (One or two clubs like Man City aside.)


How quickly they forget averaging under 6000 at the Withdean.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26477
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by genome » 12 Mar 2014 19:29

Our average attendance in our first season at the Madejski was 11,265.

Struggling to get 9,000 you say?

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by SPARTA » 12 Mar 2014 19:43

Man Friday
Warfield North Stand They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one.

Who doesn't? (One or two clubs like Man City aside.)


Someone want to post up the average attendances for 1998 to when we were in the Championship? It was never as low as 9000. ISTR 13,000's and the odd decent 16,000 when the likes of Stoke came down. The attendances steadily rose for a decade or so and are still very good.

If you still hate Futcher
Member
Posts: 623
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 16:46
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by If you still hate Futcher » 12 Mar 2014 23:03

Although we do have to factor in the way we inflate the crowd by iincluding season ticket holders who haven't turned up and also in the Elm Park days when we'd cook the books by knocking off a thousand or so from the gate


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by Ian Royal » 12 Mar 2014 23:05

If you still hate Futcher Although we do have to factor in the way we inflate the crowd by iincluding season ticket holders who haven't turned up and also in the Elm Park days when we'd cook the books by knocking off a thousand or so from the gate

I thought everyone did that...

P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by P!ssed Off » 12 Mar 2014 23:34

SPARTA
Man Friday
Warfield North Stand They were drawing flies at Elm Park, and even after wiggy built them a shiny new stadium, they struggled to get 9,000 through the gates until they looked like being promoted from league one.

Who doesn't? (One or two clubs like Man City aside.)


Someone want to post up the average attendances for 1998 to when we were in the Championship? It was never as low as 9000. ISTR 13,000's and the odd decent 16,000 when the likes of Stoke came down. The attendances steadily rose for a decade or so and are still very good.


Indeed it was.
My calculations:

Season 1998-99: Average League Attendance: 11,253
Season 1999-2000: Average League Attendance: 8,987 Oof :o
Season 2000-01: Average League Attendance: 12,647
Season 2001-02: Average League Attendance: 14,115

*Playoff games not counted.

Hampshire Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1188
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 10:56
Location: Geneva

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by Hampshire Royal » 13 Mar 2014 00:18

When was the last time we had a league gate of less than 10,000?

harry
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1584
Joined: 02 Oct 2010 17:16
Location: South Bank then East Stand

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by harry » 13 Mar 2014 00:35

P!ssed Off
Indeed it was.
My calculations:

Season 1998-99: Average League Attendance: 11,253
Season 1999-2000: Average League Attendance: 8,987 Oof :o
Season 2000-01: Average League Attendance: 12,647
Season 2001-02: Average League Attendance: 14,115

*Playoff games not counted.


The 8987 from 1999-2000 should get medals. A truly painful season. Was pants day that year? The rest has been locked away in a very dark corner of my brain.


P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by P!ssed Off » 13 Mar 2014 00:40

Hampshire Royal When was the last time we had a league gate of less than 10,000?


Tuesday 20th November 2001 vs Tranmere Rovers
Attendance: 9,007
Score: 4-1

P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by P!ssed Off » 13 Mar 2014 00:45

harry
P!ssed Off
Indeed it was.
My calculations:

Season 1998-99: Average League Attendance: 11,253
Season 1999-2000: Average League Attendance: 8,987 Oof :o
Season 2000-01: Average League Attendance: 12,647
Season 2001-02: Average League Attendance: 14,115

*Playoff games not counted.


The 8987 from 1999-2000 should get medals. A truly painful season. Was pants day that year? The rest has been locked away in a very dark corner of my brain.


My first full season as a Loyal Royal. :D
Pants day was 18 December 1999.
Attendance: 6,232. :shock:
http://www.royals.org/matdoc/181299.html

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by sandman » 13 Mar 2014 00:48

Seems the Lollerpool fans are a bit bitter at the under 18 result. Apparently we have prioritised creating athletes instead of footballers. Watch that first goal from Cardwell and the midfield three Kuhl, Fridge and Kelly and tell us we aren't trying to create good players.

Always the victims.

User avatar
PremAddict
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1129
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 15:56
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by PremAddict » 13 Mar 2014 03:38

sandman The irony of course being that the way we have built the club and the successes that have come with it over the last two decades means we are most likely one of the clubs whose template their owners will be following.

Anyhow, it's time to leave them to it.


Isn't it the English way to tear down that which you envy? :lol:

One thing I like and this is my true position: for the most part, Reading fans are relatively rational and will acknowledge the weaknesses of themselves and the club before they attempt to tear-down the opposition. For the most part....

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7403
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by Royal Ginger » 13 Mar 2014 10:46

Indeed, if anything a defeat like this can be a great learning curve, we had most of the game but conceded cheaply, we fought back well, we took the lead and just a lack of nouce, when to keep the ball, when to hoof it, when suffering cramp, boot the ball out, give a foul, stop the play and then give yourself a minute for the pain to go, then your back on it, all this helped reading get a life line, poor defending led to the equaliser. The pain of defeat will linger in the minds of those who go on to do something in the game.


I don't begrudge Reading their win at all, they were good value and while it is certainly true that their management has prioritised winning over developing players (hence the athletes instead of footballers) their mentality was a credit to their club as they refused to say die. As did we, which made for a fantastic game to watch.


Great game of football.Lads were unlucky to lose,Reading played their part in an enthralling game.
Best of luck to Reading in the semi final.


Compare it to Reading, they're set up to win games. Strong defensive formation. Holding midfielder who in front of the back 4 and striker up top on his own, sometimes with little support. They're a good side at this level, but those players aren't being designed to play at a CL club. They're being designed to be good in a competitive English club and be good for Reading. That suits them, and not us. Same reason why Norwich won the FA youth cup. Those kinds of sides have a knack of doing well in this competition.


Some surprisingly well thought out comments from a bunch of scousers.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by winchester_royal » 13 Mar 2014 10:57

As they rightly point out, we're trying to produce players that will be able to do well for us in English football. However I'm not sure I agree with the idea that our players are athletes rather than footballers. If anything the likes of Kelly, Kuhl, and Fridge were struggling a little with the pace of some of the Liverpool players. We don't have the luxury of recruiting from ckus like Barcelona, so obviously their technical skills were a little better, but mental and physical attributes are just as important at every level of the game, and tbh I thought the two teams were well matched in all 3 areas. Could have gone either way, and totally incorrect/unfair to suggest we were just playing to win, especially when you consider the risks we took trying to play it out from the back.

User avatar
maffff
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5462
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 09:22

Re: Opposition fans back from the game

by maffff » 13 Mar 2014 13:18

Their match thread / back from the game

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/ind ... 4689.72920

Some really good stuff in there to be fair, but I was amused by

Reading pens were like S.Korea in the Olympic quarter Final. Just perfectly executed.

Pretty good pens from Reading like, not bad from a bunch of shit footballers but good athletes

Another way of looking at it, we have a very attacking set up designed to breed these players in the liverpool way. If we were set up like Reading, we would have a lot more players covering and would be a lot more solid.

Development over results.

I don't begrudge Reading their win at all, they were good value and while it is certainly true that their management has prioritised winning over developing players (hence the athletes instead of footballers) their mentality was a credit to their club as they refused to say die. As did we, which made for a fantastic game to watch.

The only thing that really disappoints me is that the Reading player (McClellan? Something like that, anyway.) who raked his studs across Canos' ear after Canos had beaten him to the ball was the one to score their fourth goal. Shouldn't have been on the pitch at that point, I can't understand how the referee hasn't even booked him when he should have been sent off.

Compare it to Reading, they're set up to win games. Strong defensive formation. Holding midfielder who in front of the back 4 and striker up top on his own, sometimes with little support. They're a good side at this level, but those players aren't being designed to play at a CL club. They're being designed to be good in a competitive English club and be good for Reading. That suits them, and not us. Same reason why Norwich won the FA youth cup. Those kinds of sides have a knack of doing well in this competition.

Disappointing for them but they shouldn't be too downhearted. We deservedly got ahead in the tie and were the only team playing the football for most of the 120 mins. It's never nice to lose but they'll be stronger for it.

Congratulations to Reading. Not many 18 year olds will have got to test their long throw against both a future European Cup winning captain and a future Balon D'or winner.Unlucky to be out, but as others have remarked, they looked so much stronger and faster than us - their number 9 was a much better athlete than our defender that was on him.

Is goalkeeping always this poor at this level? Both teams' keepers were poor, and I've heard complaints before.

"Haha their number 9 looked like he lost eligibility two years ago!"

:)
Brought from Hull this summer as a 16y/o (probably 17 now) for a compensation fee of 75k.
We should scout him until the end of the season. He might be a good signing for the the U21s next season.




particular joy to watch are the bitter tweets from Michael Sweeting. He's now gone off on a vitriolic tirade against Blackburn's youth development.

Reading are through. Brannagan misses in the shootout. Such a cruel result on LFC who completely dominated a dogged Reading side.

Have to say I'm disappointed in the Reading coaching staff who became very unprofessional in extra time. Screaming "oxf*rd book him" over and over at Canos.

Submitted a match report to @thisisanfield. I'm scathing of Reading's approach. I don't like two banks of four & hoof it long at U18 level.

Saying "they're through, we aren't" misses the point. Reading staff doing a disservice to their players. #development. To the players this is great but what damage will long term coaching like this do to their career?

I don't regularly watch Reading U18s but if they play like that then they'll never produce top talent.

Your U21s were impressive. Your U18s were long ball, understandable under circumstances. As I said in article.

There was a lot of hoofing. Reliance on young Fridjonsson's throw-ins as well.

I'm just sick of youth teams that focus on results, too many in this country are like that. If you aren't like that on a weekly basis then fair enough, cup football is more reasonable to want result. I don't think you're lacking technically either that's the frustration for me. Young lads being inhibited.


Idiot.

4769 posts
It is currently 02 Aug 2025 15:27