by Snowball » 22 Jul 2009 17:29
by Ian Royal » 22 Jul 2009 17:32
Royal Rother I can't remember us having a striker who could also score 2 or 3 direct from free kicks, (or reliably from the penalty spot for that matter) so NHunt might just pick up a few more than from "normal" striking.
(Forster I suppose wasn't bad from dead ball - anyone else? Not Caskey, he wasn't a striker.)
by Royal Rother » 22 Jul 2009 17:39
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 17:53
by Snowball » 22 Jul 2009 18:02
Royalee Quite right Ian - and people need to realise that in a 4-5-1/4-3-3 style of play, the forward 3/4 players will all be looking to chip in goals the way Rodgers plays. Look at how poor the rest of our players were at this under Coppell's stewardship at times and how much we relied on the likes of Doyle and Kitson with how crap our wingers were. If you look at Robson-Kanu and Henry, they've got goals in them and if we bring in Smith and Taarabt then they'll only add to that - I also think Marek'll chip in with a fair few this year playing in a more advanced role. I think there'll be much less of a significance placed on the goal tally of the loan striker than some people think.
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 18:04
by Ian Royal » 22 Jul 2009 18:12
Royal Rother I don't remember much about Morley's days and didn't see him play that often. I had a very comfie armchair in those days I guess. Or maybe that's when I discovered pot. I was a late developer.
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 18:26
by Ian Royal » 22 Jul 2009 18:35
Royalee During Rodgers' time in charge, the goals look to have been split throughout the team:
Priskin: 12
Smith: 8
Rasiak: 8
McAnuff: 3
Cowie: 3
Jenkins: 1
O’Toole: 1
DeMerit: 1
Cork: 1
Hoskins: 1
Mariappa: 1
Williamson: 1
J Fontaine: 1
Cauna: 1
This would indicate that the system is not overly reliant on any one player and given that I believe we have a vaster array of attacking players (in midfield and attack) than Watford had last season, I would expect this to be split even more.
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 19:30
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 19:33
by SteveRoyal » 22 Jul 2009 19:42
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 19:43
by Ian Royal » 22 Jul 2009 19:48
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 19:53
by Snowball » 22 Jul 2009 19:57
by Snowball » 22 Jul 2009 19:59
Royalee Look at what percentage we're strikers' goals though - take away Long, N Hunt, Doyle, Kitson and Lita's solitary goal against Watford themselves and the goals aren't really coming from elsewhere. At Watford you had all 3 of their main strikers scoring level or above our top scorer in Long even with Smith playing deeper a lot of the time. It's also worth pointing out that their wide players McAnuff and Cowie (who only signed in the January window over a month into these games) both managed thrice as many each as ours and were playing in what most would say is a weaker team.
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 20:10
SnowballRoyalee Look at what percentage we're strikers' goals though - take away Long, N Hunt, Doyle, Kitson and Lita's solitary goal against Watford themselves and the goals aren't really coming from elsewhere. At Watford you had all 3 of their main strikers scoring level or above our top scorer in Long even with Smith playing deeper a lot of the time. It's also worth pointing out that their wide players McAnuff and Cowie (who only signed in the January window over a month into these games) both managed thrice as many each as ours and were playing in what most would say is a weaker team.
True, but of they were playing 4-3-3 then the "wingers" are expected to cut in more and act more as strikers
Our wingers were expected to get crosses in.
Those who don't like Kebe may want to consider what might happen if some of his dribbling was inside the box
by Ian Royal » 22 Jul 2009 20:13
by Royalee » 22 Jul 2009 20:15
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, windermereROYAL and 172 guests