LoyalRoyal22 If Rodgers was not sacked, we would be comfortable now. Still a pathetic decision to sack him.
How very true ... comfortably in the bottom 3.
by strap » 10 Jan 2010 20:20
LoyalRoyal22 If Rodgers was not sacked, we would be comfortable now. Still a pathetic decision to sack him.
by rhroyal » 11 Jan 2010 14:41
Terminal Boardomhowser Every possibility that we could go down again, the last relegation from the Premiership, as has already been said, was avoidable, investment in players (Sidwell replacement) would have seen us safe, likewise this season it is avoidable, but the club are doing very little to alay these fears, ambitionless, passionless from the top down, the words "Our Financial Situation" keep appearing , how the hell do we have a financial situation ? loads of dosh from the Premier league 2 x parachute payments and we have long been known as low payers, in relation to cubs of a similar size an support.
And for god sake get a manager with a track record, and not some mumbo jumbo scout, otherwise known as the "cheap option"!
The way this football club has been managed, I really don't care what happens now.
by Elm Park Old Boy » 11 Jan 2010 15:38
by Royalee » 11 Jan 2010 15:52
IdealRoyalee Location: I'm not backing Brian
So, to sum it up:
-you still think Rodgers is great No, he just wasn't given enough time to prove either way
-you blame Tim Dellor for getting Rodgers sacked To a degree - what he says sways the views of those who don't get to games (like you) and turned people against Rodgers. Of course there will have been other reasons too though.
-you invent all sorts of lame excuses to justify that Rodgers is still your hero, you weren't wrong in your judgement, and you blame Madejski I'd be considerably richer than I am if I'd invented the system for measuring time you imbecile. I was proven neither right nor wrong in my judgement and yes I do blame Madejski for acting rashly and for failing to see that he's probably been poorly advised
-and your new theme is "I'm not backing Brian" Yes, as in 'I don't think he'll be a success'
Maybe you should just move on, and get behind the team?I have - I went to Bristol and Plymouth to cheer the team on. Have you got behind the team lately? Did you get behind the team under Rodgers?
by Thaumagurist* » 11 Jan 2010 15:59
Elm Park Old Boy Aren't half a dozen teams going to go into administration, thus giving us a ten point advantage? Come on, there's got to be some benefit from having already cut the cloth that others have left all baggy and untailored.
by RoyalBlue » 11 Jan 2010 18:40
by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2010 18:47
Thaumagurist*Elm Park Old Boy Aren't half a dozen teams going to go into administration, thus giving us a ten point advantage? Come on, there's got to be some benefit from having already cut the cloth that others have left all baggy and untailored.
1) Who are they?
2) Why hasn't this been more widely reported?
3) When do you think this will happen?
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 11 Jan 2010 20:11
IdealRoyalee Location: I'm not backing Brian
So, to sum it up:
-you still think Rodgers is great
-you blame Tim Dellor for getting Rodgers sacked
-you invent all sorts of lame excuses to justify that Rodgers is still your hero, you weren't wrong in your judgement, and you blame Madejski
-and your new theme is "I'm not backing Brian"
Maybe you should just move on, and get behind the team?
by RoyalBlue » 11 Jan 2010 20:13
Ian RoyalThaumagurist*Elm Park Old Boy Aren't half a dozen teams going to go into administration, thus giving us a ten point advantage? Come on, there's got to be some benefit from having already cut the cloth that others have left all baggy and untailored.
1) Who are they?
2) Why hasn't this been more widely reported?
3) When do you think this will happen?
Watford, Palace and Cardiff have all been quite widely reported as in financial trouble at one point or another, not sure what the current state is on Watford, but the other two certainly look like quite possible candidates.
That's half the teams needed for the half dozen.
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 11 Jan 2010 20:19
RoyaleeIdealRoyalee Location: I'm not backing Brian
So, to sum it up:
-you still think Rodgers is great No, he just wasn't given enough time to prove either way
-you blame Tim Dellor for getting Rodgers sacked To a degree - what he says sways the views of those who don't get to games (like you) and turned people against Rodgers. Of course there will have been other reasons too though.
-you invent all sorts of lame excuses to justify that Rodgers is still your hero, you weren't wrong in your judgement, and you blame Madejski I'd be considerably richer than I am if I'd invented the system for measuring time you imbecile. I was proven neither right nor wrong in my judgement and yes I do blame Madejski for acting rashly and for failing to see that he's probably been poorly advised
-and your new theme is "I'm not backing Brian" Yes, as in 'I don't think he'll be a success'
Maybe you should just move on, and get behind the team?I have - I went to Bristol and Plymouth to cheer the team on. Have you got behind the team lately? Did you get behind the team under Rodgers?
by Sun Tzu » 11 Jan 2010 21:07
Ideal
The problem with this is that it won't even help us much if they do have ten points deducted.
Cardiff are on 38 points
Crystal Palace 34 points
Watford 32 points
We are on 23 points
by Pseud O'Nym » 11 Jan 2010 22:30
IdealSun TzuIdeal
The problem with this is that it won't even help us much if they do have ten points deducted.
Cardiff are on 38 points
Crystal Palace 34 points
Watford 32 points
We are on 23 points
You must do maths differently in Scandanavia.....
Errr.. do you have a problem reading the league table? I was merely stating the points as they are now. Any fool will be able to tell that. Or did you perhaps not bother looking at it before posting?
by Pseud O'Nym » 11 Jan 2010 23:05
Ideal You do understnad that only the one team would be behind us? And that they have in fact picked up more points per game, and will likely continue to do so? So it wouldn't help much, as I said, unless something CHANGES for us.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 11 Jan 2010 23:10
Ian RoyalLoyalRoyal22 If Rodgers was not sacked, we would be comfortable now. Still a pathetic decision to sack him.
What planet are you on? We've played three games, two of them against teams significantly better than us so far this season! How on earth could we be comfortable now? If we couldn't beat Scunthorpe under Rodgers what makes you think he'd have got a win in any of those games?
He certainly wouldn't have won all of them which is the only thing that might have made us comfortable now!
The idiocy of that statment is just indescribable.
by floyd__streete » 11 Jan 2010 23:21
LoyalRoyal22 On another day that would have been 5-1 to Reading.
by weybridgewanderer » 12 Jan 2010 05:48
by Terminal Boardom » 12 Jan 2010 11:39
by Sun Tzu » 12 Jan 2010 21:03
IdealSun TzuIdeal
The problem with this is that it won't even help us much if they do have ten points deducted.
Cardiff are on 38 points
Crystal Palace 34 points
Watford 32 points
We are on 23 points
You must do maths differently in Scandanavia.....
Errr.. do you have a problem reading the league table? I was merely stating the points as they are now. Any fool will be able to tell that. Or did you perhaps not bother looking at it before posting?
by rhroyal » 13 Jan 2010 05:40
by RoyalBlue » 13 Jan 2010 08:21
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 259 guests