by leon » 30 May 2014 09:17
by multisync1830 » 30 May 2014 09:19
P!ssed Off Does anyone know have any contact details for Samuelson and Obolensky?
I'd like to tell them to fuck off directly if possible...
by dizzynewheights » 30 May 2014 09:21
by Pepe the Horseman » 30 May 2014 09:21
by Pepe the Horseman » 30 May 2014 09:23
dizzynewheights why is Jonny Fordham still banging on about ReadingWas happy to sl8 the club and the town (got chased out of the AD one night when he came 'home' and hasn't been back to the town since) when he left for the big smoke but presumably the big cheeses have seen him for the small time bumpkin he is.
by Elm Park Pasty » 30 May 2014 10:07
kwik-silva Getting hung up on naming rights when he's so desperate to sell just doesn't make sense
by Royal Lady » 30 May 2014 10:18
by HoneyRoastHoax » 30 May 2014 10:35
Royal Lady Out of interest why would anyone involved in the parties interested in buying the club talk to Charles Watts before anything has been agreed?
by Norfolk Royal » 30 May 2014 10:41
HoneyRoastHoaxRoyal Lady Out of interest why would anyone involved in the parties interested in buying the club talk to Charles Watts before anything has been agreed?
Because the media is often used as a tool.
by Uke » 30 May 2014 10:47
RoyalBlue Madejski IN deep trouble and dragging the club into it too!
by Uke » 30 May 2014 10:51
blueroyalspaddy20 Hasn't the EP got an up to date Piccie of Teddy? Bit embarrassing to keep showing the one with his girlfriend now long gone! I worry that all this talk - as before - will culminate in nothing. If all these potential buyers are so keen whats the stumbling block?? Will we see this just peter out and we pay our tax bill with the sales of Macarthy and Le Fondre and we will be back to scraping a survival under the increasingly financially challenged Mt Mad?
Presumably you'd rather we sell to an asset stripper so we can keep Donkrebnyak for another year? Get real
by winchester_royal » 30 May 2014 10:52
HoneyRoastHoaxRoyal Lady Out of interest why would anyone involved in the parties interested in buying the club talk to Charles Watts before anything has been agreed?
Because the media is often used as a tool.
by multisync1830 » 30 May 2014 10:52
by Uke » 30 May 2014 10:54
multisync1830 Getting concerned CW is being fed misinformation over this.
I fail to see how 2 x directors can invoke a veto over the 2 x shareholders on any deal. They can recommend or not recommend but beyond that I believe their power is limited. They were appointed to act on TSI shareholders behalf for the good of the shareholder(s)
I suspect Boris would be none too happy if his appointed directors were upsetting any potential buyers with false stipulations.
(It is a possibility that they had a deal with TSI that they would have a 5 year contract (or whatever) and Boris is tying to force that cost onto the new owner by adding them in. ) Samuelson is also a player in the buy/sell market so if he was seen to be 'awkward' future dealings would be difficult for other clubs both buyers and sellers.
Either way the 2 directors will be sacrificed on the alter of a deal if and when necessary (if this was ever the case which as i say I have my own personal doubts) and I sense scapegoating is going on but for what reason I have no idea...
by sandman » 30 May 2014 10:56
by M Brook » 30 May 2014 11:01
paddy20 Hasn't the EP got an up to date Piccie of Teddy? Bit embarrassing to keep showing the one with his girlfriend now long gone! I worry that all this talk - as before - will culminate in nothing. If all these potential buyers are so keen whats the stumbling block?? Will we see this just peter out and we pay our tax bill with the sales of Macarthy and Le Fondre and we will be back to scraping a survival under the increasingly financially challenged Mt Mad?
by CholseyRoyal » 30 May 2014 11:33
kwik-silva Re the hold-up:
@wisdomdacosta Same as have been from the start - 40k a month to keep on two directors
Re 'Reading Royals' & Stop funding academy:
@thj0208 News to me. But re '#readingfc Royals' the club have been pushing just 'Royals' for a while now. They see it as the brand
by Sutekh » 30 May 2014 11:45
CholseyRoyalkwik-silva Re the hold-up:
@wisdomdacosta Same as have been from the start - 40k a month to keep on two directors
Re 'Reading Royals' & Stop funding academy:
@thj0208 News to me. But re '#readingfc Royals' the club have been pushing just 'Royals' for a while now. They see it as the brand
But surely if those two force buyers away the club will go straight into Administration and they will be the first out of the door. That makes me think they are trying to get the best deal for themselves, sod the club, and will back down a bit during any negotiations. I doubt Sir John has any control over them if the weight of their votes is 51%.
by Royalwaster » 30 May 2014 11:47
by HoneyRoastHoax » 30 May 2014 11:51
Users browsing this forum: cornflake, Google Adsense [Bot] and 212 guests