by Agent Balti » 02 Jun 2014 10:44
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 10:47
Readingfanman So CS and AO don't take a wage anymore and arent employed by the club at all, but still own 51% of the club?
Have no idea what is going on! Presumably they've resigned (Although why they have done so considering their payouts is beyond me?), not quite sure where it leaves any takeovers, but by the sounds of it, nothing will be happening immediatley anyway, and we *should* be in safe hands. Even if we do have to sell players to keep going (Note how SJM hasn't stated the money is coming from his own pocket, funding can be funding from many different sources after all, and the most likely one realistically still has to be player sales).
by Angry Shed Sex » 02 Jun 2014 10:49
Agent Balti ...and Burman is supposed to be flying in this week, if that rumour is still true. And if the above news was revealed last week to Burman, that could have paved the way for him to pop on over.
Here's hoping.
by Elmer Park » 02 Jun 2014 10:51
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 10:52
by Turns8 » 02 Jun 2014 10:52
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 10:54
melonheadExtended-Phenotype Eventually
complete and constant openness is such a good business plan after all
by Angry Shed Sex » 02 Jun 2014 10:54
Turns8 Maybe SJM has paid off the TSI lot * ie the fee that CS & AO wanted to remain on the board...as it was only a £million!...thus clearing the way for someone like Burman to now come in and make a bid without the need to have the two TSI clowns still around for 2 years as was the case last week...
* Using the money from the sale of ALF, the remainder of which has also covered the outstanding HMRC tax bill...
by Angry Shed Sex » 02 Jun 2014 10:55
Extended-PhenotypemelonheadExtended-Phenotype Eventually
complete and constant openness is such a good business plan after all
What difference does it make letting us know who owns the club?
As it turns out, his latest bit of drivel hardly clears anything up. He may as well have written a big shaky question mark.
by Wycombe Royal » 02 Jun 2014 11:01
by Silver Fox » 02 Jun 2014 11:01
by TFF » 02 Jun 2014 11:02
Extended-Phenotype
As it turns out, his latest bit of drivel hardly clears anything up.
by urz13 » 02 Jun 2014 11:02
melonhead and that we have funding in place to keep us ticking over through the summer
by TBM » 02 Jun 2014 11:02
melonheadTBM I think Mr M is lying as Jonny Fordham told us this
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Norfolk Royal » 02 Jun 2014 11:04
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 11:08
TBMmelonheadTBM I think Mr M is lying as Jonny Fordham told us this
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What you confused about m8?
by paultheroyal » 02 Jun 2014 11:09
Silver Fox I do love how a bit of openness from the club and the departure of said directors, the two things everyone was demanding, have rather than settle people down actually led to more extreme fvckwittery on here. Face it, none if you know anything, don't make yourselves look even stupider by posting and proving it.
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 11:09
urz13melonhead and that we have funding in place to keep us ticking over through the summer
Probably just means the McCleary, McCarthy and Obita sales are done
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 11:10
TFFExtended-Phenotype
As it turns out, his latest bit of drivel hardly clears anything up.
LOL. I guess h8ers gonna h8
TSI have no influence at the club and the club is financially stable. Given the administration rumours and the speculation that TSI's ongoing involvement in the club is a stumbling block in takeover negotiations these are both pretty big news items.
But you carry on...
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 11:10
Silver Fox I do love how a bit of openness from the club and the departure of said directors, the two things everyone was demanding, have rather than settle people down actually led to more extreme fvckwittery on here. Face it, none if you know anything, don't make yourselves look even stupider by posting and proving it.