CONFRIMATION of the CONFIMRED

10101 posts
Royal_jimmy
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5464
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 10:44
Location: Planet Earth

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Royal_jimmy » 31 Jan 2025 09:56

Tinpot Royal
Royal_jimmy Honestly this is the lowest I've ever felt as a fan of this club. It really does take it's toll on your mental health. Part of me wants protests to escalate to show how angry we are but it probably won't do any good if not make things even worse.


Lowest for me was the training ground bid acceptance from Wycombe. I'm now just kind of numb to it all!


To be fair that was probably equal with how I feel now. AKA can't feel any worse.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 09:56

windermereROYAL Anybody got a list of OOC players this summer?

Not one of them in their right mind will put pen to paper on a new one if this whole sorry mess isn`t resolved by then.

I can see the remainder slapping in transfer requests too.

The future looks bright doesn`t it.

All of them except Smith, Elliott, Savage, Wing, Knibbs and Abrefa I think.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25888
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Hound » 31 Jan 2025 10:11

Snowflake Royal
windermereROYAL Anybody got a list of OOC players this summer?

Not one of them in their right mind will put pen to paper on a new one if this whole sorry mess isn`t resolved by then.

I can see the remainder slapping in transfer requests too.

The future looks bright doesn`t it.

All of them except Smith, Elliott, Savage, Wing, Knibbs and Abrefa I think.


Depends a bit - academy players know they’ll get a chance. Vickers, Abbey, Harris have barely got a kick since they’ve gone. They’d have been regulars this year for us. Nobody would have even heard of Garcia and now he may be off to Soton

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7028
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by WestYorksRoyal » 31 Jan 2025 10:17

Feels like this summer we're really on the brink without a takeover. At the end of last season there was optimism it would happen and Selles and the squad hung around to try and build something.

Nobody has any faith any more. We need a pleasant surprise in the next 6 months, otherwise could the last person to leave turn off the lights.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7766
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by tidus_mi2 » 31 Jan 2025 10:31

WestYorksRoyal Feels like this summer we're really on the brink without a takeover. At the end of last season there was optimism it would happen and Selles and the squad hung around to try and build something.

Nobody has any faith any more. We need a pleasant surprise in the next 6 months, otherwise could the last person to leave turn off the lights.

Hope STAR have some contingency plans in place for a Phoenix Club for next season at this rate. I assume they're responsible for such undertakings.


User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 15037
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38
Location: Getting things done

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Brogue » 31 Jan 2025 10:33

the annoying thing to this all is we are not under any embargos or sanctions from the EFL, apart from not publishing our accounts. if we publish the accounts we can sign players. just publish the accounts FFS. we could bring in loans where we pay no wages, or pick up someone who could be looking to get their contract terminated for free. Grant Hanley for example, signed for Birmingham for free a couple of weeks ago as Norwich just released him from his contract 6 months early. Not saying we could get a player like Hanley, but there must be other players that clubs will be willing to do the same sort of thing. just release the accounts you pcunts!!

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2547
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by blythspartan » 31 Jan 2025 11:01

Brogue the annoying thing to this all is we are not under any embargos or sanctions from the EFL, apart from not publishing our accounts. if we publish the accounts we can sign players. just publish the accounts FFS. we could bring in loans where we pay no wages, or pick up someone who could be looking to get their contract terminated for free. Grant Hanley for example, signed for Birmingham for free a couple of weeks ago as Norwich just released him from his contract 6 months early. Not saying we could get a player like Hanley, but there must be other reasons players that clubs will be willing to do the same sort of thing. just release the accounts you pcunts!!


I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 15037
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38
Location: Getting things done

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Brogue » 31 Jan 2025 11:34

i also might be wrong :lol: but i thought we were not allowed to sign a player for a transfer fee up until this window? but we should be ok to from now on. but we were always allowed to sign free agents and loans without a fee

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 11:36

Hound
Snowflake Royal
windermereROYAL Anybody got a list of OOC players this summer?

Not one of them in their right mind will put pen to paper on a new one if this whole sorry mess isn`t resolved by then.

I can see the remainder slapping in transfer requests too.

The future looks bright doesn`t it.

All of them except Smith, Elliott, Savage, Wing, Knibbs and Abrefa I think.


Depends a bit - academy players know they’ll get a chance. Vickers, Abbey, Harris have barely got a kick since they’ve gone. They’d have been regulars this year for us. Nobody would have even heard of Garcia and now he may be off to Soton

Yeah, I dont buy the no one will join us, and of course some of.the youth at least have extension options. Just confirming those actualy contracted


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 11:41

blythspartan
Brogue the annoying thing to this all is we are not under any embargos or sanctions from the EFL, apart from not publishing our accounts. if we publish the accounts we can sign players. just publish the accounts FFS. we could bring in loans where we pay no wages, or pick up someone who could be looking to get their contract terminated for free. Grant Hanley for example, signed for Birmingham for free a couple of weeks ago as Norwich just released him from his contract 6 months early. Not saying we could get a player like Hanley, but there must be other reasons players that clubs will be willing to do the same sort of thing. just release the accounts you pcunts!!


I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

We're under two different embargos.

1) we can't make any signings except to bring the squad up to 23 players with a professional appearance (we have 30 odd) for not filing our accounts, I think.

2) we can't pay transfer fees or compensation fees of any type because we accumulated a lot of late payment with HMRC. That expires end of this summer, so the next window we can pay a fee in is January 26, I believe.

But yes, if we submitted our accounts, I think we could sign frees.

Of course, if we submitted our accounts it seems we'd have to either go into administration/liquidation by declaring ourselves not a going concern (because we clearly aren't one), or the Directors would be committing fraud. Maybe, is what I've gathered from others.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22633
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Sutekh » 31 Jan 2025 11:50

Snowflake Royal
blythspartan
Brogue the annoying thing to this all is we are not under any embargos or sanctions from the EFL, apart from not publishing our accounts. if we publish the accounts we can sign players. just publish the accounts FFS. we could bring in loans where we pay no wages, or pick up someone who could be looking to get their contract terminated for free. Grant Hanley for example, signed for Birmingham for free a couple of weeks ago as Norwich just released him from his contract 6 months early. Not saying we could get a player like Hanley, but there must be other reasons players that clubs will be willing to do the same sort of thing. just release the accounts you pcunts!!


I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

We're under two different embargos.

1) we can't make any signings except to bring the squad up to 23 players with a professional appearance (we have 30 odd) for not filing our accounts, I think.

2) we can't pay transfer fees or compensation fees of any type because we accumulated a lot of late payment with HMRC. That expires end of this summer, so the next window we can pay a fee in is January 26, I believe.

But yes, if we submitted our accounts, I think we could sign frees.

Of course, if we submitted our accounts it seems we'd have to either go into administration/liquidation by declaring ourselves not a going concern (because we clearly aren't one), or the Directors would be committing fraud. Maybe, is what I've gathered from others.


Given this is the football industry and a great many clubs are in a parlous state I find that hard to believe. What do other badly struggling businesses do that are in the process of being sold? If the club is sold and ownership approved it’s just as much a going concern as any other club.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 11:55

Sutekh
Snowflake Royal
blythspartan
I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

We're under two different embargos.

1) we can't make any signings except to bring the squad up to 23 players with a professional appearance (we have 30 odd) for not filing our accounts, I think.

2) we can't pay transfer fees or compensation fees of any type because we accumulated a lot of late payment with HMRC. That expires end of this summer, so the next window we can pay a fee in is January 26, I believe.

But yes, if we submitted our accounts, I think we could sign frees.

Of course, if we submitted our accounts it seems we'd have to either go into administration/liquidation by declaring ourselves not a going concern (because we clearly aren't one), or the Directors would be committing fraud. Maybe, is what I've gathered from others.


Given this is the football industry and a great many clubs are in a parlous state I find that hard to believe. What do other badly struggling businesses do that are in the process of being sold? If the club is sold and ownership approved it’s just as much a going concern as any other club.

Other clubs have owners offsetting losses with loans and converting debt to shares or even writing off debt.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2547
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by blythspartan » 31 Jan 2025 11:59

Snowflake Royal
blythspartan
Brogue the annoying thing to this all is we are not under any embargos or sanctions from the EFL, apart from not publishing our accounts. if we publish the accounts we can sign players. just publish the accounts FFS. we could bring in loans where we pay no wages, or pick up someone who could be looking to get their contract terminated for free. Grant Hanley for example, signed for Birmingham for free a couple of weeks ago as Norwich just released him from his contract 6 months early. Not saying we could get a player like Hanley, but there must be other reasons players that clubs will be willing to do the same sort of thing. just release the accounts you pcunts!!


I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

We're under two different embargos.

1) we can't make any signings except to bring the squad up to 23 players with a professional appearance (we have 30 odd) for not filing our accounts, I think.

2) we can't pay transfer fees or compensation fees of any type because we accumulated a lot of late payment with HMRC. That expires end of this summer, so the next window we can pay a fee in is January 26, I believe.

But yes, if we submitted our accounts, I think we could sign frees.

Of course, if we submitted our accounts it seems we'd have to either go into administration/liquidation by declaring ourselves not a going concern (because we clearly aren't one), or the Directors would be committing fraud. Maybe, is what I've gathered from others.


Thanks for clarifying.

I had it in my head that we couldn’t sign players last summer (free agents/out of contract players until we got new owners and we were subsequently placed under an embargo due to the accounts not being submitted, but think that was made official in the autumn.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 12:09

blythspartan
Snowflake Royal
blythspartan
I might be wrong, but we’re we not under an embargo before the accounts situation? Pretty sure we couldn’t sign anyone while Dai remained the owner.

We're under two different embargos.

1) we can't make any signings except to bring the squad up to 23 players with a professional appearance (we have 30 odd) for not filing our accounts, I think.

2) we can't pay transfer fees or compensation fees of any type because we accumulated a lot of late payment with HMRC. That expires end of this summer, so the next window we can pay a fee in is January 26, I believe.

But yes, if we submitted our accounts, I think we could sign frees.

Of course, if we submitted our accounts it seems we'd have to either go into administration/liquidation by declaring ourselves not a going concern (because we clearly aren't one), or the Directors would be committing fraud. Maybe, is what I've gathered from others.


Thanks for clarifying.

I had it in my head that we couldn’t sign players last summer (free agents/out of contract players until we got new owners and we were subsequently placed under an embargo due to the accounts not being submitted, but think that was made official in the autumn.

It's so complicated that might not be perfectly correct, whether the reasons or timescales are spot on, but I'm pretty confident about the two aspects.

traff
Member
Posts: 459
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 00:08

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by traff » 31 Jan 2025 13:05

Can anyone explain why we have not been struck off of Companies House as the accounts are so overdue.
I thought the limit was 3 months?

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3986
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Mid Sussex Royal » 31 Jan 2025 13:55

traff Can anyone explain why we have not been struck off of Companies House as the accounts are so overdue.
I thought the limit was 3 months?


From the Gov.UK Website:

Not filing your accounts or confirmation statements is a criminal offence. Directors or LLP designated members could be personally fined for this in the criminal courts.

Failing to pay your late filing penalty can result in enforcement proceedings. Any criminal proceedings for not filing confirmation statements or accounts is separate from (and in addition to) any late filing penalties issued by Companies House against the company.

You could get a financial penalty if you do not file your confirmation statement on time. The registrar could also take steps to strike your company off the register.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8784
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by stealthpapes » 31 Jan 2025 15:02

Phoenix club needs someone who really wants to make it work.

I don't know if you've followed Bury, but they ended up with two phoenix clubs, who didn't really speak to each other.

EDIT - one lot owned the club, the other lot owned the ground, I think its all resolved now.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45953
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jan 2025 15:17

stealthpapes Phoenix club needs someone who really wants to make it work.

I don't know if you've followed Bury, but they ended up with two phoenix clubs, who didn't really speak to each other.

EDIT - one lot owned the club, the other lot owned the ground, I think its all resolved now.

You'd hope (lol) STAR and SBWD would cooperate and lead on it if necessary.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12574
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by bcubed » 31 Jan 2025 15:22

Snowflake Royal
stealthpapes Phoenix club needs someone who really wants to make it work.

I don't know if you've followed Bury, but they ended up with two phoenix clubs, who didn't really speak to each other.

EDIT - one lot owned the club, the other lot owned the ground, I think its all resolved now.

You'd hope (lol) STAR and SBWD would cooperate and lead on it if necessary.


Plenty of useful guidance here
For someone...

https://thefsa.org.uk/fan-resources/res ... 0they%20do.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22633
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Sutekh » 31 Jan 2025 16:56

Snowflake Royal
stealthpapes Phoenix club needs someone who really wants to make it work.

I don't know if you've followed Bury, but they ended up with two phoenix clubs, who didn't really speak to each other.

EDIT - one lot owned the club, the other lot owned the ground, I think its all resolved now.

You'd hope (lol) STAR and SBWD would cooperate and lead on it if necessary.


Just DON’T call it AFC Reading.

10101 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 81 guests

It is currently 08 Jul 2025 07:23