by marcusopp » 31 May 2011 10:36
by TBM » 31 May 2011 10:39
by Agent Balti » 31 May 2011 10:40
marcusopp There's a lot of strong sides in the division next year. I reckon half have a shout of going up;
Leicester, Leeds, Forest, West Ham, Reading, Burnley, Hull, M'boro, Portsmouth, Southampton and maybe Birmingham and Blackpool.
I think we'll be right up there, depends on how quickly we can rebuild. If we can't, then it could be bottom half if that lot do ok...
by Row Z Royal » 31 May 2011 10:45
by URZZZZZZZZ » 31 May 2011 10:49
by loyalroyal4life » 31 May 2011 10:52
URZZZZZZZZ To be fair, we weren't a promotion prospect this season.
by URZZZZZZZZ » 31 May 2011 10:57
by PEARCEY » 31 May 2011 10:59
Row Z Royal Just so you know, we're not a promotion prospect next season.
by Svlad Cjelli » 31 May 2011 11:02
by PEARCEY » 31 May 2011 11:04
Svlad Cjelli People still seem to have the old blind spot that spending money equals success. It doesn't, it only makes it more likely - ask Cardiff, ask Forest, ask Leicester.
AT this level, it's been proved so many times that a good manager who can force players into a real team can be as successful as someone who just throws money at the problem.
Team >>>> expensive individuals
by savage 4 england » 31 May 2011 11:06
by The Prisoner » 31 May 2011 11:07
by brendywendy » 31 May 2011 11:12
by URZZZZZZZZ » 31 May 2011 11:15
by The Prisoner » 31 May 2011 11:15
brendywendy if we lose kebe and long, it changes the way well play.no one works as hard as long,and no one is as quick as kebe on the break. Then with kish.ivar,bryn,harte that bit older and If mills goes its a whole rebuild of the defence required,though at least weve made a start with that swindon guy and cummo.manset makes a start up front,but there and on the wings we are short of quality and creativity.
However,with mcd in charge,and money for those players,we will get people in, i just think its bound to set us back a little.cest la vie.
by Wycombe Royal » 31 May 2011 11:16
brendywendy if we lose kebe and long, it changes the way well play.no one works as hard as long,and no one is as quick as kebe on the break. Then with kish.ivar,bryn,harte that bit older and If mills goes its a whole rebuild of the defence required,though at least weve made a start with that swindon guy and cummo.manset makes a start up front,but there and on the wings we are short of quality and creativity.
However,with mcd in charge,and money for those players,we will get people in, i just think its bound to set us back a little.cest la vie.
by Snowball » 31 May 2011 11:19
by Mr Angry » 31 May 2011 11:21
by PEARCEY » 31 May 2011 11:22
by Snowball » 31 May 2011 11:23
Wycombe Royalbrendywendy if we lose kebe and long, it changes the way well play.no one works as hard as long,and no one is as quick as kebe on the break. Then with kish.ivar,bryn,harte that bit older and If mills goes its a whole rebuild of the defence required,though at least weve made a start with that swindon guy and cummo.manset makes a start up front,but there and on the wings we are short of quality and creativity.
However,with mcd in charge,and money for those players,we will get people in, i just think its bound to set us back a little.cest la vie.
The defence needs rebuilding anyway regardless of who leaves. It was shown up for what it is yesterday - slow and cumbersome.
As for Kebe. Yes he is quick but how may goals do we actually score from his lightening attacks? Not that many. Why? Because he either has no end product (hits the first defender, hits it too long, fals over, etc) or because on the odd occasion he does put in a decent ball no one else has kept up with him.
Only occasionally do we score as a direct result of his pace. HRK has been more effective in the few appearances he has made in my opinion, and at least McAnuff can take corners and freekicks (something else which Kebe cannot do).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 149 guests