by Uke » 01 Feb 2008 12:18
by Row Z Royal » 01 Feb 2008 12:22
by Royal Fleet » 01 Feb 2008 12:27
by Hoop Blah » 01 Feb 2008 12:27
by cmonurz » 01 Feb 2008 12:34
by Uke » 01 Feb 2008 12:36
Hoop Blah It's all subjective.
How are you going to say whether a player has made a positive impact on their new side?
Even if they don't play having that player might be pushing the players in the side to perform better.
They might've just been bought to add depth to a squad so that if a player in the side loses form. gets suspended or picks up an injury the team isn't weakened as much. That is possibly just as important to the relegation battle when a point here or there can make a massive difference.
If you look at our squad, how many players are under pressure for their spot in the team? How much cover do we have if someone like Harper or Hunt gets injured?
Are we well equiped to cope with an injury crisis over Easter?
by Alan Partridge » 01 Feb 2008 12:38
by Hoop Blah » 01 Feb 2008 12:40
Uke It'll be clear who makes a contribution from their performances, otherwise they're just makeweights and a burden on the salary.
To paraphrase a "well known manager", the ultimate test will be the table at the end of the season...
Also let's not turn this thread into another slag our squad off - please! Theere are a million and one other threads for that.
by Uke » 01 Feb 2008 14:16
Alan Partridge Quite a few there I personally wouldn't have minded! whether all of them would have fit in here is different but solely as players a few of them would have been more than decent.
by Archies Volley » 01 Feb 2008 14:56
UkeAlan Partridge Quite a few there I personally wouldn't have minded! whether all of them would have fit in here is different but solely as players a few of them would have been more than decent.
Past performance is no guarantee of future performance (as with shares) that's why we should watch from now on.
Basically a line is now drawn in the sand (turf?) from which we see how well we have done.
by Spirit of Elm Park » 01 Feb 2008 15:34
by g » 01 Feb 2008 15:41
by BR2 » 01 Feb 2008 15:49
Spirit of Elm Park One thing to say.... Andy Reid £5m.
I rest my case.
Glad to see we haven't been dragged into taking players purely because sections of our fanbase demand it. There is no messiah. We were good enough in August, and we are still good enough now.
Not RTG, just realism.
by Hoop Blah » 01 Feb 2008 16:04
Hoop BlahUke It'll be clear who makes a contribution from their performances, otherwise they're just makeweights and a burden on the salary.
To paraphrase a "well known manager", the ultimate test will be the table at the end of the season...
Also let's not turn this thread into another slag our squad off - please! Theere are a million and one other threads for that.
So you don't believe in having a squad to cover for players being unavailable or out of form then?
I'm not slagging anyone off thanks, just offering an opinion on the subject of the thread.
by phil in cornwall » 01 Feb 2008 16:16
by brendywendy » 01 Feb 2008 16:27
by brendywendy » 01 Feb 2008 16:29
by Spirit of Elm Park » 01 Feb 2008 16:35
brendywendy routledge is the only one on there in a position we needed to strengthen,that could perhaps have been attracted here, and that i would have wanted-couldnt get in the spurs side though, so jury out on whether he is better/worse than kebe
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Feb 2008 16:44
by Archies Volley » 01 Feb 2008 16:55
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe The centre half at Fulham does look good.
ROutledge obviously would have done us a job, but the more I think about it the more I realise we didn't have a chance of getting him.
The real question I guess, is there anyone our rivals signed, who we could have actually got? Depressingly the answer could be no.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests