by westendgirl »
01 Oct 2009 21:38
Bowman's Quiver
And why, when discussing revenue from the Premier League years do they not allow for "transfer activity", but then tell us how much they spent on players bought in to the club (£10.6 million).
I'm not normally one to be critical of the club but Disraeli spring to mind. T'was he who apparently said there are `lies, damn lies and statistics'.
Quite possibly because in accountancy terms profit is one thing and capital movements something else. So transfer money in is capital and doesn't contribute to profit. That is why the statement talks of reinvestment on player transfers - you invest in capital items.