RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up now

by M4 Junction 11 » 13 Jan 2007 12:11
RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
by readingbedding » 13 Jan 2007 12:17
M4 Junction 11RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up now
by M4 Junction 11 » 13 Jan 2007 12:31
readingbeddingM4 Junction 11RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up now
Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.
by RoyalBlue » 13 Jan 2007 15:15
readingbeddingM4 Junction 11RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up now
Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.
by readingbedding » 13 Jan 2007 16:06
RoyalBluereadingbeddingM4 Junction 11RoyalBlue On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up now
Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.
My god! To think I'm described as cynical!
by Royal Lady » 13 Jan 2007 16:11
by westendgirl » 13 Jan 2007 19:19
Royal Lady How do you know it's the truth. Do you think she might have been attracted to him as a person, rather than his job?
by The 17 Bus » 14 Jan 2007 06:24
by readingbedding » 14 Jan 2007 09:41
westendgirlRoyal Lady How do you know it's the truth. Do you think she might have been attracted to him as a person, rather than his job?
Couldn't agree with you more, money may seem important but if you do not like the person you are married I don't think even Beckham's money would be enough.
It is interesting now many of the WAGs have been with their respectives for much longer than the recent success, but then why let a little fact like that get in the way of cynicism (or jealousy?).
by RoyalBlue » 14 Jan 2007 10:49
The 17 Bus I thought it was meant that Mrs Sidders would not be on the programme if Sidders was a binman, not that she is only with him cos of his job, or did i read it wrong?
by Mr Angry » 15 Jan 2007 10:16
HaroldRoyal LadySpot on Mr A, except for Krystall Sidwell soon to be appearing in a celebrity reality TV show!Mr Angry What a surprise, the efforts of the wags of our team are being slagged off by supporters of, er....Man Utd, Liverpool and Chelsea.
![]()
I guess the fact that they aren't spending £100K a month on designer tat, or posing for lads mags or being invited onto the latest "celebrity" TV reality programme shows that we are still a little club.
Fair play to The Royal Families, they are raising money from the community to give to local worthy causes, and I, for one, will continue to support them.
As was once said, a cynic is someone who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.
so it's not a celebrity reality tv show then?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests