by Sanguine »
14 Feb 2025 14:31
Winston Biscuit Sanguine For all its controversy, 90% of the impact of VAR has been positive.
surely thats a highly subjective %
can you clarify what Positive means is in this result?
- Correctly introduces technology into the game. Digital technology is (correctly) used in all mainstream sport, football should not be an exception.
- Has introduced the ability to amend poor decision-making. PGMOL's stats show that 'correct decisions' have increased a few percentage points.
- Has reduced some of the cynicism in the game. As above, simulation has become almost a thing of the past. When it happens now, players just look a bit silly.
- Has improved defending. Again as above, less diving in in the box, less shirt-pulling. Players will stand off attackers a little now. Ironically this sometimes makes it harder to score, teams focused on being in position, formation.
- (Some) transparency. Improvement to be had here, and a lot of it. But the more that mistakes are highlighted, and the more PGMOL can be convinced to talk about them, the more accountable referees are to clubs and fans.
- Like goal-line tech, semi-automated offside (and this will become fully automated in time) eliminates unnecessary subjectivity in decision-making.
All of that imho far outweighs 'it takes too long', 'i looked like a willy cos I celebrated and it was disallowed' and that there still some errors.