by paultheroyal » 14 Dec 2013 22:09
by paultheroyal » 14 Dec 2013 22:10
by yappy » 14 Dec 2013 22:26
by URZZZZZ » 14 Dec 2013 22:42
yappy Absolute joke of a decision IMO.
by yappy » 14 Dec 2013 23:22
by Wycombe Royal » 14 Dec 2013 23:57
yappy No disrespect to West Brom but really the only aim for most teams, outside the top 8 in the Premier League, is just to stay up. I still think Clarke would've pulled them away from the relegation zone if given time. Whilst they have had some disappointing results, they did get 3 points at Old Trafford, held Arsenal at home and were robbed of 3 points at Stamford Bridge.
Considering they finished 8th last season, I can't help but feel Clarke should've been given a little bit longer. Bit of a knee jerk reaction in my opinion.
by Dave_Kitson » 15 Dec 2013 00:04
by sandman » 15 Dec 2013 00:08
by TBM » 15 Dec 2013 00:19
by URZZZZZ » 15 Dec 2013 00:20
by TBM » 15 Dec 2013 00:24
by St. Brynjar » 15 Dec 2013 01:41
by soggy biscuit » 15 Dec 2013 10:00
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2013 13:24
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2013 13:25
Victor Meldrew West Brom doing a Charlton and over-rating where they should be-a win at home to Hull next Saturday would see them just below mid-table.
The board and fans should be careful what they wish for.
by Ian Royal » 15 Dec 2013 16:25
by Barry the bird boggler » 15 Dec 2013 18:19
Ian Royal Why would a PL team looking to be top half hire a manager with less than one season of PL experience where he proved to be a failure?
by Pepe the Horseman » 15 Dec 2013 18:20
Barry the bird bogglerIan Royal Why would a PL team looking to be top half hire a manager with less than one season of PL experience where he proved to be a failure?
How many years of experience managing in the PL did Clark have before WBA appointed him?
by genome » 15 Dec 2013 18:21
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests