by tmesis » 22 Jan 2023 00:15
by Four Of Clubs » 22 Jan 2023 10:27
by Royals and Racers » 23 Jan 2023 19:36
by Loafer » 23 Jan 2023 22:16
by paultheroyal » 24 Jan 2023 08:45
tmesis Alton 1 Farnham 1 in the combined counties league - nearly 600 for this derby game.
Not a fantastic game, but the big talking point was the referee disallowing an 88th penalty for Alton that would have put the home side 2-1 up. He disallowed it for encroachment, which is picky, but fair enough, but rather than ordering a retake, he awarded a free-kick to Farnham.
According to one bemused Alton player, the ref told him that because only one player had encroached, it was a free kick, not a retake.
A check of the current FA rules makes no mention of this 'directive'.
He was also one of those refs that after a ball was deflected behind for a corner, and both teams take up positions for the corner unquestioningly, he decides that all the players are wrong, and it's really a goal kick.
by Stranded » 24 Jan 2023 14:20
paultheroyaltmesis Alton 1 Farnham 1 in the combined counties league - nearly 600 for this derby game.
Not a fantastic game, but the big talking point was the referee disallowing an 88th penalty for Alton that would have put the home side 2-1 up. He disallowed it for encroachment, which is picky, but fair enough, but rather than ordering a retake, he awarded a free-kick to Farnham.
According to one bemused Alton player, the ref told him that because only one player had encroached, it was a free kick, not a retake.
A check of the current FA rules makes no mention of this 'directive'.
He was also one of those refs that after a ball was deflected behind for a corner, and both teams take up positions for the corner unquestioningly, he decides that all the players are wrong, and it's really a goal kick.
If as described, the referee got this wrong.
If attacking team encroach and the penalty is scored its a retaken penalty. If attacking team encroach and penalty missed its a in-direct free kick to the defending team.
by Royal Rother » 24 Jan 2023 15:46
tmesis Alton 1 Farnham 1 in the combined counties league - nearly 600 for this derby game.
Not a fantastic game, but the big talking point was the referee disallowing an 88th penalty for Alton
by Sutekh » 24 Jan 2023 15:48
Strandedpaultheroyaltmesis Alton 1 Farnham 1 in the combined counties league - nearly 600 for this derby game.
Not a fantastic game, but the big talking point was the referee disallowing an 88th penalty for Alton that would have put the home side 2-1 up. He disallowed it for encroachment, which is picky, but fair enough, but rather than ordering a retake, he awarded a free-kick to Farnham.
According to one bemused Alton player, the ref told him that because only one player had encroached, it was a free kick, not a retake.
A check of the current FA rules makes no mention of this 'directive'.
He was also one of those refs that after a ball was deflected behind for a corner, and both teams take up positions for the corner unquestioningly, he decides that all the players are wrong, and it's really a goal kick.
If as described, the referee got this wrong.
If attacking team encroach and the penalty is scored its a retaken penalty. If attacking team encroach and penalty missed its a in-direct free kick to the defending team.
Unfortunately, sounds like a situation where the ref made a mistake and instead of holding his hands up, doubled down and tried to talk himself out of it knowing he has control. He'll know he cocked up.
by paultheroyal » 24 Jan 2023 16:07
SutekhStrandedpaultheroyal
If as described, the referee got this wrong.
If attacking team encroach and the penalty is scored its a retaken penalty. If attacking team encroach and penalty missed its a in-direct free kick to the defending team.
Unfortunately, sounds like a situation where the ref made a mistake and instead of holding his hands up, doubled down and tried to talk himself out of it knowing he has control. He'll know he cocked up.
How are refs assessed at that level? I presume there isn’t an independent assessor at each game (as you might get in the PL and FL) in non-league so presume much of it must come from club management feedback (which must be fun to read after some games).
by Sutekh » 24 Jan 2023 16:19
paultheroyalSutekhStranded
Unfortunately, sounds like a situation where the ref made a mistake and instead of holding his hands up, doubled down and tried to talk himself out of it knowing he has control. He'll know he cocked up.
How are refs assessed at that level? I presume there isn’t an independent assessor at each game (as you might get in the PL and FL) in non-league so presume much of it must come from club management feedback (which must be fun to read after some games).
An ex referee who has performed at same level or higher would be assessing. I would imagine at a game like this with crowd expected then an assessor would be provided. They are not at all games but certainly for up and coming referee's and higher leagues ie isthmian south etc then they are pretty much at most games. Again, this sort of game i would of expected it to be officiated by an experienced referee or a future star.
Referee's are promoted via assessor marks but predominantly club marks awarded by the club secretary - this is totally wrong in my opinion and a number of good referee's don't make it because of the club mark system.
by paultheroyal » 24 Jan 2023 16:27
SutekhpaultheroyalSutekh
How are refs assessed at that level? I presume there isn’t an independent assessor at each game (as you might get in the PL and FL) in non-league so presume much of it must come from club management feedback (which must be fun to read after some games).
An ex referee who has performed at same level or higher would be assessing. I would imagine at a game like this with crowd expected then an assessor would be provided. They are not at all games but certainly for up and coming referee's and higher leagues ie isthmian south etc then they are pretty much at most games. Again, this sort of game i would of expected it to be officiated by an experienced referee or a future star.
Referee's are promoted via assessor marks but predominantly club marks awarded by the club secretary - this is totally wrong in my opinion and a number of good referee's don't make it because of the club mark system.
Thanks for that, can quite understand how the club mark system puts some off though would presume a club secretary would, in most cases, defer their “marks” to the club manager a few days later (not that that would necessarily make things any better of course).
by Royal Rother » 24 Jan 2023 17:42
by tmesis » 24 Jan 2023 17:44
paultheroyalSutekhpaultheroyal
An ex referee who has performed at same level or higher would be assessing. I would imagine at a game like this with crowd expected then an assessor would be provided. They are not at all games but certainly for up and coming referee's and higher leagues ie isthmian south etc then they are pretty much at most games. Again, this sort of game i would of expected it to be officiated by an experienced referee or a future star.
Referee's are promoted via assessor marks but predominantly club marks awarded by the club secretary - this is totally wrong in my opinion and a number of good referee's don't make it because of the club mark system.
Thanks for that, can quite understand how the club mark system puts some off though would presume a club secretary would, in most cases, defer their “marks” to the club manager a few days later (not that that would necessarily make things any better of course).
What is wrong with it and where i fell foul in early stages is you could have a blinding game, in all matter of refereeing skills and then give a contentious decision in the last minute affecting outcome of game, even if you were right. Club secretaries and managers would see it very differently and score you unfairly which could be a factor in promotion or demotion.
by paultheroyal » 24 Jan 2023 23:05
tmesispaultheroyalSutekh
Thanks for that, can quite understand how the club mark system puts some off though would presume a club secretary would, in most cases, defer their “marks” to the club manager a few days later (not that that would necessarily make things any better of course).
What is wrong with it and where i fell foul in early stages is you could have a blinding game, in all matter of refereeing skills and then give a contentious decision in the last minute affecting outcome of game, even if you were right. Club secretaries and managers would see it very differently and score you unfairly which could be a factor in promotion or demotion.
Is there a culture of linesmen not arguing with referees?
I ask, because in incidents like this, surely at least one of the linesmen would be thinking the ref has got it wrong.
It was sort of like the ref thought that if only the attacking side encroached, then it's a free kick (if the ball goes in the net) but I find it hard to believe all the officials would come to the same incorrect understanding.
by Royal Rother » 25 Jan 2023 14:17
by paultheroyal » 25 Jan 2023 15:41
Royal Rother Refs are marked at all levels aren't they? Even Sunday League park football.
by paultheroyal » 25 Jan 2023 15:43
Royal Rother When I've run the line on Sunday league games I have argued with the ref.![]()
Trouble is I suppose they are used to all linos being partisan so will sometimes override an offside flag. I am 100% fair and honest (sometimes to the distress of my son's team!) so if I flag for offside I expect it to be "honoured" and it pisses me off immensely when it is not. Doesn't happen often because I guess they can tell who is decent (up with the play, quick and clear in flagging, NOT the norm in park footie) and whose decisions they can generally trust.
by Dirk Gently » 25 Jan 2023 15:47
paultheroyaltmesispaultheroyal
What is wrong with it and where i fell foul in early stages is you could have a blinding game, in all matter of refereeing skills and then give a contentious decision in the last minute affecting outcome of game, even if you were right. Club secretaries and managers would see it very differently and score you unfairly which could be a factor in promotion or demotion.
Is there a culture of linesmen not arguing with referees?
I ask, because in incidents like this, surely at least one of the linesmen would be thinking the ref has got it wrong.
It was sort of like the ref thought that if only the attacking side encroached, then it's a free kick (if the ball goes in the net) but I find it hard to believe all the officials would come to the same incorrect understanding.
In all my years of refereeing and through all my levels I never had an argument or witnessed one to be fair. Either as assistant or referee. We remain loyal throughout. We might have a conversation after the game and might say “you got that wrong” and actually in a game you might say that and between you a call is made.
by Royal Rother » 25 Jan 2023 16:01
paultheroyalRoyal Rother When I've run the line on Sunday league games I have argued with the ref.![]()
Trouble is I suppose they are used to all linos being partisan so will sometimes override an offside flag. I am 100% fair and honest (sometimes to the distress of my son's team!) so if I flag for offside I expect it to be "honoured" and it pisses me off immensely when it is not. Doesn't happen often because I guess they can tell who is decent (up with the play, quick and clear in flagging, NOT the norm in park footie) and whose decisions they can generally trust.
Should never be the need to fall out with a club linesman, providing the club linesman does his job and does not get involved in discussion. Ball in and out of play and offsides.
I would always go with the decision of club linesman unless i witness blatant cheating. Its also a brilliant cop out for the referee because you can just say to players "blame him, he gave it".
by Royals and Racers » 25 Jan 2023 16:04
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests