by Hoop Blah » 21 May 2010 09:54
by Sun Tzu » 21 May 2010 09:58
Hoop Blah Experience isn't just about spending time out on the pitch though.
Just being in and around the first team and playing the odd game here and there still means that Ashdown is the more experienced keeper. He's been part of a squad that's played in high pressure games, been successful and also been unsuccessful. Just being there in those different situations teaches you how to handle them.
That's not to say playing doesn't teach you more, but being there and being a pro for 10 years does make Ashdown the more experienced keeper.
Hamer has done good service during his loan spells and has also competed for promotions and seen that through, so he's had good experiences as well a just being out there. At 21 though he still has more maturing to do than Ashdown.
Given a choice between Ashdown and any of our young keepers as number 1 next season I think the choice is pretty simple and Ashdown wins every time for me.
by I was there at Elm Park » 21 May 2010 10:23
Sun TzuHoop Blah Experience isn't just about spending time out on the pitch though.
Just being in and around the first team and playing the odd game here and there still means that Ashdown is the more experienced keeper. He's been part of a squad that's played in high pressure games, been successful and also been unsuccessful. Just being there in those different situations teaches you how to handle them.
That's not to say playing doesn't teach you more, but being there and being a pro for 10 years does make Ashdown the more experienced keeper.
Hamer has done good service during his loan spells and has also competed for promotions and seen that through, so he's had good experiences as well a just being out there. At 21 though he still has more maturing to do than Ashdown.
Given a choice between Ashdown and any of our young keepers as number 1 next season I think the choice is pretty simple and Ashdown wins every time for me.
Would you not be concerned that in a 10 year career Ashdown has never been considered good enough to be selected for a game on his own merits ?
I agree with much of your comment but for Ashdown to be seen as a better bet than our very talented (and not inexperienced) keepers largely on the basis that he's not been selected for games on a consistent basis, but has watched others playing at a high level, seems a less than encouraging situation !
I'd say go with whichever of the 3 youngsters has the most ability and let them add to the experience they already have by playing competitive games.
by FiNeRaIn » 21 May 2010 10:35
by Hoop Blah » 21 May 2010 10:40
Sun Tzu Would you not be concerned that in a 10 year career Ashdown has never been considered good enough to be selected for a game on his own merits ?
I agree with much of your comment but for Ashdown to be seen as a better bet than our very talented (and not inexperienced) keepers largely on the basis that he's not been selected for games on a consistent basis, but has watched others playing at a high level, seems a less than encouraging situation !
I'd say go with whichever of the 3 youngsters has the most ability and let them add to the experience they already have by playing competitive games.
on the Federici thread Hoop Blah Good point on Ashdown though. He's never played a full season, and although I think he's got a lot going for him and appears to be the more steady and reliable type of keeper (a Hahnemann or Seaman rather than Federici or James), he may well find that difficult both physically and mentally. I doubt it though, but it could be a consideration.
I think he'll have a few offers too, and it's such a shame he left and has wasted a good few years of his career by sitting on the bench. Perhaps there's a lesson there for Federici too!
by Sun Tzu » 21 May 2010 17:59
by Big Foot » 22 May 2010 10:37
Who else would make a move for him? He's not got a track record or reputation as such, I think he'd do a good job certainly at this level but not sure who's radar he'd be on...Sun Tzu So the question is whether Ashdown would be interested in coming back to hold the fort for a year until we decide which one of the 3 kids is going to be the long term choice ?
Will be interesting to see whether we do make him an offer, I'd argue that the money / wages would probably be better off invested elsewhere in the side, but having said that a strong, reliable keeper is a must and if we can;t see any of our current 4 either being around or being up to it I guess we look elsewhere !
by Kitson12 » 22 May 2010 10:40
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 22 May 2010 11:43
by PEARCEY » 22 May 2010 12:23
by PEARCEY » 22 May 2010 12:23
by glass half full » 22 May 2010 18:49
by Sun Tzu » 23 May 2010 19:14
Big FootWho else would make a move for him? He's not got a track record or reputation as such, I think he'd do a good job certainly at this level but not sure who's radar he'd be on...Sun Tzu So the question is whether Ashdown would be interested in coming back to hold the fort for a year until we decide which one of the 3 kids is going to be the long term choice ?
Will be interesting to see whether we do make him an offer, I'd argue that the money / wages would probably be better off invested elsewhere in the side, but having said that a strong, reliable keeper is a must and if we can;t see any of our current 4 either being around or being up to it I guess we look elsewhere !
by Ian Royal » 23 May 2010 23:25
by Hoop Blah » 24 May 2010 09:54
Sun Tzu So the question is whether Ashdown would be interested in coming back to hold the fort for a year until we decide which one of the 3 kids is going to be the long term choice ?
Will be interesting to see whether we do make him an offer, I'd argue that the money / wages would probably be better off invested elsewhere in the side, but having said that a strong, reliable keeper is a must and if we can;t see any of our current 4 either being around or being up to it I guess we look elsewhere !
by FiNeRaIn » 24 May 2010 13:28
Hoop Blah If we coudl get money for Federici and replace him with Ashdown on a free I think we'd have done a great bit of business and, IMO, improved the team.
by Hoop Blah » 24 May 2010 13:52
FiNeRaInHoop Blah If we coudl get money for Federici and replace him with Ashdown on a free I think we'd have done a great bit of business and, IMO, improved the team.
What makes you think that if Ashdown is better than Federici, people won't sign him before spending money for federici? Bit of a no brainer.
by Sun Tzu » 24 May 2010 17:25
Hoop Blah
If they're good enough one of them will challenge and go past him. If not then they'll end up spending a few seasons learnign their trade under a decent keeper before finding their natural level.
by Alan Partridge » 24 May 2010 23:46
by Hoop Blah » 25 May 2010 10:20
Sun Tzu Problem with that is a keeper has no chance to challenge.
Keepers get in the side because the previous incumbant messed up. So as long as your number 1 keeper is doing OK your number 2,3 and 4 have no chance. Sign an 'OK' experienced keeper and you may as well get rid of your more talented youngster (see Ben Foster....)
I don;t thing any of our youngsters need a few seasons learning their trade from Ashdown, who is at best a journeyman. They all have the ability, what they all need now is games at a higher level.
But I agree it's a bit academic as I would not expect to see Fed go !!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests