by Wycombe Royal » 27 Dec 2010 20:35
by Para Handy » 27 Dec 2010 20:43
Sir Dodger Royal Hull are obviously showing some ambition unlike our egotistic tight fisted old ghit of a Chairman.
Real Facts Real World.
by Arch » 27 Dec 2010 23:04
by winchester_royal » 27 Dec 2010 23:38
Arch Can't get a game at 17th placed Leicester; moving for a daft sum to 15th placed Hull. Remind me why we should even remotely care about this?
by Sir Dodger Royal » 28 Dec 2010 11:00
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Dec 2010 12:33
Wycombe Royal According to the media the fee is £1.5m. That is not ambition, it is stupidity.
by Barry the bird boggler » 29 Dec 2010 07:16
by Svlad Cjelli » 29 Dec 2010 13:14
loyalroyal4lifeWycombe Royal According to the media the fee is £1.5m. That is not ambition, it is stupidity.
If that is the fee being touted i would rather go without a striker then sign him
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 29 Dec 2010 14:43
by Arch » 29 Dec 2010 16:30
DOYLERSAROYALER ...would much prefer Watford's Danny Graham - shame the club seem to be moving away from the financial difficulties they were in, so no need to sell their best players...
by loyalroyal4life » 30 Dec 2010 14:20
by brendywendy » 01 Jan 2011 19:07
Hull had agreed a fee with Leicester to sign prolific forward Fryatt
by 1871 Royal » 02 Jan 2011 11:45
by Kitson12 » 02 Jan 2011 11:56
1871 Royal Are Hull just signing every striker they can lay their hands on? Didn't they sign another one a couple of weeks ago?!
by 1871 Royal » 02 Jan 2011 13:17
by Sir Dodger Royal » 02 Jan 2011 13:18
by UpNorth » 02 Jan 2011 13:18
by loyalroyal4life » 02 Jan 2011 13:22
1871 Royal Are Hull just signing every striker they can lay their hands on? Didn't they sign another one a couple of weeks ago?!
by brendywendy » 02 Jan 2011 18:03
Sir Dodger Royal At least Hull were prepared to spend Premier League drop money on players as opposed to the Madman bailing out a printing company.
What a nobbbbbbbbbbbb
by Sir Dodger Royal » 02 Jan 2011 19:19
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 152 guests