by FiNeRaIn » 07 Jan 2009 23:34
by Colin Cheeselog » 08 Jan 2009 09:21
winchester_royalColin Cheeselog A very good signiing if Birmingham get him. Would be the best forward in the division.
Apart from Doyle, Beattie and SEB....
by winchester_royal » 08 Jan 2009 12:19
Colin Cheeselogwinchester_royalColin Cheeselog A very good signiing if Birmingham get him. Would be the best forward in the division.
Apart from Doyle, Beattie and SEB....
In my opinion Boyd is better. Also in my opinion, if you watched him regularly you would agree with me.
by Sun Tzu » 08 Jan 2009 12:44
FiNeRaIn Boyd wouldn't join reading, not a big enough club. Possibly wolves, birmingham or wba IMO.
by Hoop Blah » 08 Jan 2009 13:26
Sun TzuFiNeRaIn Boyd wouldn't join reading, not a big enough club. Possibly wolves, birmingham or wba IMO.
I assume you put together two sentences from different threads there as there seems a strange mismatch between the two comments.
Without igniting a pointless 'what is a big club' debate it is a bit silly to suggest a mid range Scottish striker would consider the subtle differences in perceived size of some very similar mid sized English clubs when deciding whose pay cheque he liked the best.
by Deathy » 08 Jan 2009 13:34
by Sun Tzu » 08 Jan 2009 13:50
Hoop BlahSun TzuFiNeRaIn Boyd wouldn't join reading, not a big enough club. Possibly wolves, birmingham or wba IMO.
I assume you put together two sentences from different threads there as there seems a strange mismatch between the two comments.
Without igniting a pointless 'what is a big club' debate it is a bit silly to suggest a mid range Scottish striker would consider the subtle differences in perceived size of some very similar mid sized English clubs when deciding whose pay cheque he liked the best.
This is a footballers mind your all trying to read though, never easy to do!
Hoop Blah I think our stock has risen quite significantly over the last few years, but I'd imagine we're still not as attractive a proposition as those mentioned IF the money is pretty equal. Coppell always seems to think so anyway...
by No Hoops » 08 Jan 2009 15:05
by FiNeRaIn » 08 Jan 2009 15:20
Deathy Er, why isn't Reading big enough?
Everything about the club is set for Premier League football. Full stadium to boot. Plans in place should we choose to develop the stadium to accomodate fans we know are there, albeit, glory supporters - like at any club (you are taking notice of Birmingham's attendances, FiNeRaIn?)
by Sun Tzu » 08 Jan 2009 15:27
FiNeRaInDeathy Er, why isn't Reading big enough?
Everything about the club is set for Premier League football. Full stadium to boot. Plans in place should we choose to develop the stadium to accomodate fans we know are there, albeit, glory supporters - like at any club (you are taking notice of Birmingham's attendances, FiNeRaIn?)
More ambition and wiling to spend more to attract players, on top of a far bigger history, birmingham are a bigger club im afraid. We are jsut a small club doing well, it wont last.
by Deathy » 08 Jan 2009 16:05
Sun TzuFiNeRaInDeathy Er, why isn't Reading big enough?
Everything about the club is set for Premier League football. Full stadium to boot. Plans in place should we choose to develop the stadium to accomodate fans we know are there, albeit, glory supporters - like at any club (you are taking notice of Birmingham's attendances, FiNeRaIn?)
More ambition and wiling to spend more to attract players, on top of a far bigger history, birmingham are a bigger club im afraid. We are jsut a small club doing well, it wont last.
...the players they are willing to pay more for aren't as good as ours
by Hoop Blah » 08 Jan 2009 16:18
by Mr Angry » 08 Jan 2009 16:31
by Sun Tzu » 08 Jan 2009 16:34
Hoop Blah Reading are perceived as a small time club on the up.
That's probably not as appealing to a player as a club with a history and image of a more passionate footballing city.
I'm sure if I were a player and not a Reading fan I'd probably rather play (money being equal) for someone like Stoke or Birmingham than a Reading or Wigan. It might not be right but I'm sure that's the perception.
by Alan Partridge » 08 Jan 2009 16:37
Mr Angry If history and size of team was a consideration, why did someone like Valencia go to Wigan???
I suggest that what motivates a player in moving to a club in the Championship are the following items in order...
1. Weekly salary
2. signing on fee
3. bonuses
4. chance of promotion to Premiership leading to an increase of numbers 1 and 3.
With Kris Boyd I suspect that he would be interested in Brum because of McLeish - don't forget he was a respected Scottish National Manager.
by FiNeRaIn » 08 Jan 2009 16:59
Sun TzuHoop Blah Reading are perceived as a small time club on the up.
That's probably not as appealing to a player as a club with a history and image of a more passionate footballing city.
I'm sure if I were a player and not a Reading fan I'd probably rather play (money being equal) for someone like Stoke or Birmingham than a Reading or Wigan. It might not be right but I'm sure that's the perception.
On the basis of your being a professional footballer I'll bow to your superior knowledge then ! I suspect the fact that Birmingham won the League Cup in the early 60's has a massive bearing on how a player in his early 20's decides who to sign for !
I also think your idea of how Reading might be perceived is several years out of date. Birmingham could be said to be perceived as a club run by a bunch of crooks totally overshadowed by their massively bigger and more successful local rivals who talk a better game than they actually deliver.
by Sun Tzu » 08 Jan 2009 17:07
FiNeRaIn
You can patronise him all you want, but hes spot on. Players don't want to play for us, thats why we attract sweet FA in the transfer market, coppells also commented on it.
by FiNeRaIn » 08 Jan 2009 17:10
by TBM » 08 Jan 2009 17:15
by Alan Partridge » 08 Jan 2009 17:17
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk and 84 guests