RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

151 posts
User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by SteveRoyal » 14 Jan 2010 11:56

After last nights performance, I wouldn't want him gone.

User avatar
Comfortably Numb
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 23:10
Location: Think that'll do.

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Comfortably Numb » 14 Jan 2010 13:11

Yeah and one goal from Long and he's suddenly amazing too... One great save at Old Trafford, a good performanec last night, the rest of his games have been wobbly at best. For seven figures, you sell sell sell.

Plymouth_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1143
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 13:53
Location: Location, Location.

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Plymouth_Royal » 14 Jan 2010 13:29

Comfortably Numb Yeah and one goal from Long and he's suddenly amazing too... One great save at Old Trafford, a good performanec last night, the rest of his games have been wobbly at best. For seven figures, you sell sell sell.


Agree about Long but for me feds has been unfairly criticised by a lot of our supporters. He's had an awful defence in front of him and has saved us from a more embarrasing scoreline in some matches this season. He's got less league experience than Hamer and spent his early career playing for a mediocre team in australia. When he came to england he just spent time on trial everywhere. By no means is he the finished article but at 24 with little experience he's done well.

User avatar
Upper West Ginger
Member
Posts: 900
Joined: 09 Jun 2007 01:38
Location: Dario Gradi's garden shed

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Upper West Ginger » 14 Jan 2010 13:42

Last night when Federic ran out to warm up for the second half he got a huge round of applause from the Kop. In fact, he was probably the only recipiemt of such adulation from the Kop all night, as none of the Liverpool players deserved any!

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16921
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by TBM » 14 Jan 2010 14:28

SteveRoyal After last nights performance, I wouldn't want him gone.


:| He didn't have anything to do bar pick the ball out the net, stand up infront of a weak Benayoun shoot and take a catch at the end.


OLLIE KEARNS
Member
Posts: 436
Joined: 23 May 2008 10:30
Location: East Berks

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by OLLIE KEARNS » 14 Jan 2010 16:45

Upper West Ginger Last night when Federic ran out to warm up for the second half he got a huge round of applause from the Kop. In fact, he was probably the only recipiemt of such adulation from the Kop all night, as none of the Liverpool players deserved any!


A long standing Liverpool tradition for all visiting keepers. Haven't been there for years but it was always impressive that they did that. I heard that Jobi got applause from all corners for the run as well ??

Sarah Star
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3186
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 12:29

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Sarah Star » 14 Jan 2010 17:07

SteveRoyal After last nights performance, I wouldn't want him gone.

I'd put his price up.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Ian Royal » 14 Jan 2010 17:52

Sarah Star
SteveRoyal After last nights performance, I wouldn't want him gone.

I'd put his price up.


This. It's not like Rafa has form for spending multi-millions on sub-quality players.

I like Feds, I think he's a good player for us and will only get better. But no way is he worth £1m, let alone £2m, so whilst I'd be happy for him to stay with us a long time. I'd still rather we sold at that price or higher.

I'm not too confident in Hamer being good enough in the situation we're in though...

User avatar
zummerset
Member
Posts: 817
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 18:18
Location: Don't tell I tell ee

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by zummerset » 14 Jan 2010 17:58

There was a good reason why Marcus kept Feds out for so long and that was because Feds really isn't a great keeper. I can't see why Hamer + some confidence may not be just as good. Best sell Feds before Rafa gets the sack anyway.


User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Rawlie19 » 14 Jan 2010 18:00

zummerset There was a good reason why Marcus kept Feds out for so long and that was because Feds really isn't a great keeper. I can't see why Hamer + some confidence may not be just as good. Best sell Feds before Rafa gets the sack anyway.

Also, Marcus being a pretty good 'keeper helped. As he's proving at Wolves. Not doing a bad job.

User avatar
zummerset
Member
Posts: 817
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 18:18
Location: Don't tell I tell ee

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by zummerset » 14 Jan 2010 18:04

Rawlie19
zummerset There was a good reason why Marcus kept Feds out for so long and that was because Feds really isn't a great keeper. I can't see why Hamer + some confidence may not be just as good. Best sell Feds before Rafa gets the sack anyway.

Also, Marcus being a pretty good 'keeper helped. As he's proving at Wolves. Not doing a bad job.


Agreed! But his kicking and distribution is still shockingly poor - almost a random technique. However a great guy and deserving of his premier league hurrah.

User avatar
zummerset
Member
Posts: 817
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 18:18
Location: Don't tell I tell ee

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by zummerset » 14 Jan 2010 18:04

Rawlie19
zummerset There was a good reason why Marcus kept Feds out for so long and that was because Feds really isn't a great keeper. I can't see why Hamer + some confidence may not be just as good. Best sell Feds before Rafa gets the sack anyway.

Also, Marcus being a pretty good 'keeper helped. As he's proving at Wolves. Not doing a bad job.

User avatar
yappy
Member
Posts: 719
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:56

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by yappy » 14 Jan 2010 18:59

Plymouth_Royal By no means is he the finished article but at 24 with little experience he's done well.


Spot on. 24 is very young for a keeper and considering his lack of experience I think he looks very assured, and he'll only get better. Hahnemann made just as many mistakes in his early days at the club, and he grew to be a very good keeper, and I think Federici could follow suit.


PEARCEY
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5970
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 23:44

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by PEARCEY » 14 Jan 2010 19:18

yappy
Plymouth_Royal By no means is he the finished article but at 24 with little experience he's done well.


Spot on. 24 is very young for a keeper and considering his lack of experience I think he looks very assured, and he'll only get better. Hahnemann made just as many mistakes in his early days at the club, and he grew to be a very good keeper, and I think Federici could follow suit.



Indeed Feds is still young and I think he could become a very good keeper.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 14 Jan 2010 20:20

To be honest I'd be quite happy with an older keeper coming in. Basso, Simonson, Carlo Nash.

Get AFEd out, if we can get even £500k. Don't think Hamer/McCarthy could be thrown in the team at this stage, too much pressure.

rotherwick_royal
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 21 Sep 2006 15:08
Location: In a field in Hampshire

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by rotherwick_royal » 14 Jan 2010 21:30

I would be truly shocked if Liverpool made a bid. Having said that, although Feds has done ok, I don't believe there would be any way we would turn down a reasonable offer, even if it was dressed up as 'not standing in his way'.

By all accounts we've got some talented young keepers. I'd give them a chance and use the money to buy a decent striker.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22416
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Royal Rother » 15 Jan 2010 09:54

I think Federici is a fine shot stopper, not great on crosses and not great on positioning but there are 2 parts of his game that are world class.

Standing up and making himself big in front of onrushing strikers so they end up hitting a part of that massive frame is something he does time and time again, (best I've seen at all levels since Schmeichel) and his distribution is absolutely top notch.

There's plenty to work on and build on there as he is still inexperienced. I do think he's going to be a very good 'keeper eventually.

I know coming on for 20 minutes at the end of a game isn't easy but Hamer frightened the life out of me the other day

User avatar
yappy
Member
Posts: 719
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:56

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by yappy » 15 Jan 2010 11:08

You say Federici is not great on crosses, but I can hardly recall him flapping at any, yet Hamer was on for 20 minutes and look at that Torres headed chance, Hamer was nowhere. I think Feds is very underestimated by most on here.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by Platypuss » 15 Jan 2010 11:16

yappy You say Federici is not great on crosses, but I can hardly recall him flapping at any,


Isn't that the whole point - he doesn't come out to claim anywhere near as many as he should in the first place.

User avatar
yappy
Member
Posts: 719
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:56

Re: RUMOUR - Federici to Liverpool

by yappy » 15 Jan 2010 11:41

Platypuss
yappy You say Federici is not great on crosses, but I can hardly recall him flapping at any,


Isn't that the whole point - he doesn't come out to claim anywhere near as many as he should in the first place.


But is that actually true? I can't recall many goals where I'm thinking 'Feds should have claimed that.'

For me the problem has been the defence, Rodgers insisted on playing the ball out of defence but Ivar and Pearce struggled to pass it 5 yards at the best of times, so we were needlessly giving away possession, and due to their lack of pace they would just stand off players and allow pressure. Playing a left footed central midfielder at right back also did us no favours, although in the circumstances I think Tabb has done fairly well there. If I look back at alot of the goals we have conceded it's normally Ivar or Pearce most guilty IMO. I think we're lucky to have someone as good between the sticks as Fed.

151 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests

It is currently 08 Sep 2025 11:24